# Roots of Polynomials HW Help

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

I got the question:

The roots of x^4+ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 are alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. Given that alpha + beta = gamma + delta , show that a^3+8c=4ab.

I know that I can expand out the roots but I'm not sure if that'd be too helpful. Could you please give me some pointers on where to start and go?

Many thanks for your help!

The roots of x^4+ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 are alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. Given that alpha + beta = gamma + delta , show that a^3+8c=4ab.

I know that I can expand out the roots but I'm not sure if that'd be too helpful. Could you please give me some pointers on where to start and go?

Many thanks for your help!

1

reply

Report

#2

I've spoilered the answer because I thought this was actually one of the nicest questions of this form I've ever seen and thought some other people might like to give it a try.

ghostwalker RDKGames mqb2766 davros

Spoiler:

Show

Consider factorising into a pair of quadratics (x^2 + Ax + B)(x^2 + Cx + D) with roots alpha,beta and gamma,delta respectively. It comes out pretty quickly from there.

ghostwalker RDKGames mqb2766 davros

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

I've spoilered the answer because I thought this was actually one of the nicest questions of this form I've ever seen and thought some other people might like to give it a try.

ghostwalker RDKGames mqb2766 davros

**DFranklin**)I've spoilered the answer because I thought this was actually one of the nicest questions of this form I've ever seen and thought some other people might like to give it a try.

Spoiler:

Show

Consider factorising into a pair of quadratics (x^2 + Ax + B)(x^2 + Cx + D) with roots alpha,beta and gamma,delta respectively. It comes out pretty quickly from there.

ghostwalker RDKGames mqb2766 davros

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

I've spoilered the answer....

**DFranklin**)I've spoilered the answer....

Last edited by ghostwalker; 3 weeks ago

0

reply

**DFranklin**)

I've spoilered the answer because I thought this was actually one of the nicest questions of this form I've ever seen and thought some other people might like to give it a try.

Spoiler:

Show

Consider factorising into a pair of quadratics (x^2 + Ax + B)(x^2 + Cx + D) with roots alpha,beta and gamma,delta respectively. It comes out pretty quickly from there.

ghostwalker RDKGames mqb2766 davros

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

I'm afraid I'm still not sure what to do after this. The others in my class have the same issue.

**kensafw**)I'm afraid I'm still not sure what to do after this. The others in my class have the same issue.

To start with, what is the relationship between (combinations of the) roots and "a", the cubic coefficient?

If you go with the previuos hint, make two quadratics out of the alpha and beta, and the gamma and delta roots. Then the overall quartic is the product of these two quadratics (but don't expand at the moment).

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 weeks ago

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

The answer has a, b and c in it (no d), so that suggests relating the roots to the cubic, quadratic and linear coefficients.

To start with, what is the relationship between (combinations of the) roots and "a", the cubic coefficient?

**mqb2766**)The answer has a, b and c in it (no d), so that suggests relating the roots to the cubic, quadratic and linear coefficients.

To start with, what is the relationship between (combinations of the) roots and "a", the cubic coefficient?

and .

Since we have .

When you multiply out these brackets for the term, you have .

When you multiply out these brackets for the term, you have

When you multiply out these brackets for the term, you have

From here you can show the result holds.

Last edited by RDKGames; 3 weeks ago

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

~snip~

**RDKGames**)~snip~

**somewhat**bigger hint than I'd consider reasonable...

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

RDKGamesmqb2766DFranklin

Thank you for all your help but unfortunately, I just cannot get my head round it! I have a Maths lesson tomorrow in which I'll ask my teacher to go over this question but hopefully, this can be of use to someone else in the future.

**kensafw**)RDKGamesmqb2766DFranklin

Thank you for all your help but unfortunately, I just cannot get my head round it! I have a Maths lesson tomorrow in which I'll ask my teacher to go over this question but hopefully, this can be of use to someone else in the future.

where has roots and has roots .

Considering the first quadratic, we know that , and if we consider the second quadratic we know that .

The question tells us that which means that via these two relations we have found.

Now, equate coefficients between the quartics above. We get

The result you seek does not involve so we can forget about it and just consider the first three results. Since we can reduce them to

what you can now proceed to do is eliminate between these three relations.

E.g. from first relation we know that which means our other two become

What can you do with these two equations to eliminate terms? You should hence obtain a result entirely in terms of which corresponds to the result you seek.

Last edited by RDKGames; 3 weeks ago

1

reply

(Original post by

Since has four roots then we can rewrite as a product of two quadratics

where has roots and has roots .

Considering the first quadratic, we know that , and if we consider the second quadratic we know that .

The question tells us that which means that via these two relations we have found.

Now, equate coefficients between the quartics above. We get

The result you seek does not involve so we can forget about it and just consider the first three results. Since we can reduce them to

what you can now proceed to do is eliminate between these three relations.

E.g. from first relation we know that which means our other two become

What can you do with these two equations to eliminate terms? You should hence obtain a result entirely in terms of which corresponds to the result you seek.

**RDKGames**)Since has four roots then we can rewrite as a product of two quadratics

where has roots and has roots .

Considering the first quadratic, we know that , and if we consider the second quadratic we know that .

The question tells us that which means that via these two relations we have found.

Now, equate coefficients between the quartics above. We get

The result you seek does not involve so we can forget about it and just consider the first three results. Since we can reduce them to

what you can now proceed to do is eliminate between these three relations.

E.g. from first relation we know that which means our other two become

What can you do with these two equations to eliminate terms? You should hence obtain a result entirely in terms of which corresponds to the result you seek.

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

Thank you so much! This is really helpful and I do now understand it. I'm just curious as to why you can just disregard without having to cancel it out or anything?

**kensafw**)Thank you so much! This is really helpful and I do now understand it. I'm just curious as to why you can just disregard without having to cancel it out or anything?

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top