Back
to top
religion has no satisfactory response to the challenge of the verification principle.
Watch this thread
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
uniquelove
Badges:
7
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
hi guys, i was wondering if anyone studies A-level religious studies
i need help writing an A02 15 marker for this question: religion has no satisfactory response to the challenge of the verification principle.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks]
I simply need to know the structure of how to write it and what to include in each paragraph.
i need help writing an A02 15 marker for this question: religion has no satisfactory response to the challenge of the verification principle.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks]
I simply need to know the structure of how to write it and what to include in each paragraph.
0
reply
Joe312
Badges:
17
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
(Original post by uniquelove)
hi guys, i was wondering if anyone studies A-level religious studies
i need help writing an A02 15 marker for this question: religion has no satisfactory response to the challenge of the verification principle.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks]
I simply need to know the structure of how to write it and what to include in each paragraph.
hi guys, i was wondering if anyone studies A-level religious studies
i need help writing an A02 15 marker for this question: religion has no satisfactory response to the challenge of the verification principle.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks]
I simply need to know the structure of how to write it and what to include in each paragraph.
Ayer's argument for verificationism, the verification principle
Criticism of Ayer: the verification principle cannot itself be verified.
Ayer's defence (optional)
Either a final criticism of Ayer or your explanation of why Ayer's defence is successful.
Paragraph 2:
Hick's eschatological verification as a criticism of Ayer
Criticism of Hick
Either your defence of Ayer or your explanation of why Hick's argument is successful.
Paragraph 3:
Wittgenstein's language games as a criticism of Ayer
Criticism of Wittgenstein
Either your defence of Ayer or your explanation of why Wittgenstein's argument is successful.
Last edited by Joe312; 1 year ago
1
reply
uniquelove
Badges:
7
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
uniquelove
Badges:
7
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
uniquelove
Badges:
7
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Joe312
Badges:
17
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by uniquelove)
For an A02 do you just need three paragraphs and a conclusion?
For an A02 do you just need three paragraphs and a conclusion?
You should do a short intro too.
3 paragraphs, each with one argument for/against the debate question, at least one criticism, (optional to defend against that criticism) and always ending with your judgement as to which of the two sides of the debate you will have represented wins and why.
Last edited by Joe312; 1 year ago
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
