Mechanics- velocity and acceleration

Watch
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#1
Its question 11Name:  16062217406263768208377306079461.jpg
Views: 17
Size:  211.7 KBName:  16062217909486111387988675387159.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  141.5 KB
Last edited by Shas72; 1 month ago
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 month ago
#2
(Original post by Shas72)
Its question 11Name:  16062217406263768208377306079461.jpg
Views: 17
Size:  211.7 KBName:  16062217909486111387988675387159.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  141.5 KB
What does that diagram show?
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#3
it shows decelerating
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#4
Report 1 month ago
#4
(Original post by Shas72)
it shows decelerating
Is that what you understand is happening to the velocity, as described in the question?
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#5
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#5
the block is lifted from ground at a constant speed till 5s. after 5s it slips and decelerates at 10m/s^2 and reaches a height of 6m which means the total area under the graph is 6m
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 month ago
#6
(Original post by Shas72)
the block is lifted from ground at a constant speed till 5s. after 5s it slips and decelerates at 10m/s^2 and reaches a height of 6m which means the total area under the graph is 6m
That's what the question says, does your graph show that?
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#7
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#7
(Original post by mqb2766)
That's what the question says, does your graph show that?
Name:  16062235305886815727657351250066.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  117.2 KB
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 month ago
#8
(Original post by Shas72)
Name:  16062235305886815727657351250066.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  117.2 KB
Have a think for maybe 10 minutes and explicitly match the different sections to the question. There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple. The more you can do yourself, the better you'll understand/remember. If you have a specific question about what something means, post that.
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#9
(Original post by mqb2766)
Have a think for maybe 10 minutes and explicitly match the different sections to the question. There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple. The more you can do yourself, the better you'll understand/remember. If you have a specific question about what something means, post
Can you pls tell me if my second graph is right?
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 month ago
#10
There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#11
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#11
(Original post by mqb2766)
There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple
Ok thanks! Let me try
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#12
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#12
(Original post by mqb2766)
There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple
Can you pls sketch the graph if its not inconvenient or can you pls give me a hint on how to solve this question. I have tried to do in diff ways of using a = v-u/t
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#13
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#13
(Original post by mqb2766)
Have a think for maybe 10 minutes and explicitly match the different sections to the question. There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple. The more you can do yourself, the better you'll understand/remember. If you have a specific question about what something means, post that.
Also if its ground level u is 0. So when I do a = v-u/t, I get -50
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#14
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#14
(Original post by mqb2766)
There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple
Thanks! I got the ans. I came to know where I was doing mistakes
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#15
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#15
(Original post by mqb2766)
There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple
And it was very very simple. I was unnecessarily complicating it
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#16
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#16
(Original post by mqb2766)
Have a think for maybe 10 minutes and explicitly match the different sections to the question. There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple. The more you can do yourself, the better you'll understand/remember. If you have a specific question about what something means, post th
Attachment 977412 I got the ans but without the graph and mainly using the displacement and not the concept of area under the graph. I still don't get the ans with the graph. Can you pls guide
Last edited by Shas72; 1 month ago
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#17
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#17
(Original post by mqb2766)
Have a think for maybe 10 minutes and explicitly match the different sections to the question. There are a few important mistakes even though the graph is relatively simple. The more you can do yourself, the better you'll understand/remember. If you have a specific question about what something means, post that.
Name:  1606479342844689384809520017497.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  244.1 KB I got the ans using displacement and not the area under the graph. Can you pls tell me where am I going wrong in the graph part
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#18
Report 1 month ago
#18
(Original post by Shas72)
Name:  1606479342844689384809520017497.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  244.1 KB I got the ans using displacement and not the area under the graph. Can you pls tell me where am I going wrong in the graph part
Sure, can you upload your current attempt at the velocity-time graph? Maybe (briefly) mark on each section why you think it's that shape. I don't care whether the graph is right. I do care whether you try to explain your thinking behind the graph.
0
reply
Shas72
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#19
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#19
(Original post by mqb2766)
Sure, can you upload your current attempt at the velocity-time graph? Maybe (briefly) mark on each section why you think it's that shape. I don't care whether the graph is right. I do care whether you try to explain your thinking behind the graph.
Name:  16064811219171396311277115100961.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  118.8 KB
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#20
Report 1 month ago
#20
(Original post by Shas72)
Name:  16064811219171396311277115100961.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  118.8 KB
Your constant speed label is correct, but what does your graph section show?
What is the speed when t=1,2,3,4,5? Is it constant?
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you experienced financial difficulties as a student due to Covid-19?

Yes, I have really struggled financially (74)
17.75%
I have experienced some financial difficulties (121)
29.02%
I haven't experienced any financial difficulties and things have stayed the same (157)
37.65%
I have had better financial opportunities as a result of the pandemic (52)
12.47%
I've had another experience (let us know in the thread!) (13)
3.12%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise