Back
to top
nth Term Rule (Deductive Rule)
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Is there a certain way of finding the nth term rule of a sequence?
I really struggle finding it for sequences - it seems to just be a trial and error attempt of playing around with the first term until achieving the second, then testing that out on the next term (and so on).
As an example with this question:
Write down a deductive rule in the form Ur = ... for the general term of the sequence 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
I really struggle finding it for sequences - it seems to just be a trial and error attempt of playing around with the first term until achieving the second, then testing that out on the next term (and so on).
As an example with this question:
Write down a deductive rule in the form Ur = ... for the general term of the sequence 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
0
reply
Report
#2
(Original post by beachpanda)
Is there a certain way of finding the nth term rule of a sequence?
I really struggle finding it for sequences - it seems to just be a trial and error attempt of playing around with the first term until achieving the second, then testing that out on the next term (and so on).
As an example with this question:
Write down a deductive rule in the form Ur = ... for the general term of the sequence 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
Is there a certain way of finding the nth term rule of a sequence?
I really struggle finding it for sequences - it seems to just be a trial and error attempt of playing around with the first term until achieving the second, then testing that out on the next term (and so on).
As an example with this question:
Write down a deductive rule in the form Ur = ... for the general term of the sequence 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
In this case you want to be looking at the difference between each term...
0
reply
(Original post by davros)
Most of the examples you'll be given will have a relatively straightforward form that you will have encountered in class.
In this case you want to be looking at the difference between each term...
Most of the examples you'll be given will have a relatively straightforward form that you will have encountered in class.
In this case you want to be looking at the difference between each term...
The sequences have been straightforward but the only method I know is going from term 1 to term 2, finding a rule, then trying it out on the next term, and so on. Not very efficient for a sequence with 100's of terms in though lol
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by beachpanda)
I'm self studying so haven't seen anything in class
The sequences have been straightforward but the only method I know is going from term 1 to term 2, finding a rule, then trying it out on the next term, and so on. Not very efficient for a sequence with 100's of terms in though lol
I'm self studying so haven't seen anything in class
The sequences have been straightforward but the only method I know is going from term 1 to term 2, finding a rule, then trying it out on the next term, and so on. Not very efficient for a sequence with 100's of terms in though lol
The point is that they'll give you something that has to be deducible from 4 or 5 terms otherwise it wouldn't be manageable and no-one would get it in the exam
0
reply
(Original post by davros)
But they're not going to give you a sequence with "100s of terms in" are they??
The point is that they'll give you something that has to be deducible from 4 or 5 terms otherwise it wouldn't be manageable and no-one would get it in the exam
But they're not going to give you a sequence with "100s of terms in" are they??
The point is that they'll give you something that has to be deducible from 4 or 5 terms otherwise it wouldn't be manageable and no-one would get it in the exam
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by beachpanda)
I see, so it is just a case of trial and error?
I see, so it is just a case of trial and error?
As davros says, with 4 or 5 terms, it can't be too complex a sequence.
Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago
1
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by mqb2766)
A constant difference between terms is linear (arithmetic sequence), a constant second difference is quadratic sequence. If you keep differencing and the sequence still grows at the same rate, it's exponential/geometric (look at the ratio between terms, rather than the difference) ... You should have met this before?
As davros says, with 4 or 5 terms, it can't be too complex a sequence.
A constant difference between terms is linear (arithmetic sequence), a constant second difference is quadratic sequence. If you keep differencing and the sequence still grows at the same rate, it's exponential/geometric (look at the ratio between terms, rather than the difference) ... You should have met this before?
As davros says, with 4 or 5 terms, it can't be too complex a sequence.
(Original post by beachpanda)
I see, so it is just a case of trial and error?
I see, so it is just a case of trial and error?
Be a bit wary of TSR - people tend to throw all sorts of sequences on here: some are standard exam questions, some have typos, some are competition standard, and some are made up by teachers to keep pupils occupied and don't follow any simple mathematical rule
2
reply
(Original post by mqb2766)
A constant difference between terms is linear (arithmetic sequence), a constant second difference is quadratic sequence. If you keep differencing and the sequence still grows at the same rate, it's exponential/geometric (look at the ratio between terms, rather than the difference) ... You should have met this before?
As davros says, with 4 or 5 terms, it can't be too complex a sequence.
A constant difference between terms is linear (arithmetic sequence), a constant second difference is quadratic sequence. If you keep differencing and the sequence still grows at the same rate, it's exponential/geometric (look at the ratio between terms, rather than the difference) ... You should have met this before?
As davros says, with 4 or 5 terms, it can't be too complex a sequence.
(Original post by davros)
PRSOM
As explained above, it's not really "trial and error" - it's learning to recognize different types of sequences that are covered by your syllabus and the methods used to identify them.
Be a bit wary of TSR - people tend to throw all sorts of sequences on here: some are standard exam questions, some have typos, some are competition standard, and some are made up by teachers to keep pupils occupied and don't follow any simple mathematical rule
PRSOM
As explained above, it's not really "trial and error" - it's learning to recognize different types of sequences that are covered by your syllabus and the methods used to identify them.
Be a bit wary of TSR - people tend to throw all sorts of sequences on here: some are standard exam questions, some have typos, some are competition standard, and some are made up by teachers to keep pupils occupied and don't follow any simple mathematical rule
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Ofqual consultationTeachers to use 'mini-exams' and other work to decide grades
- Is it too late to do well in my A-levels?
- What Harry Potter house are you in?
- 2021 wellbeing blog launch
- Student tips on lockdown mental health