The Student Room Group

policemen with handheld speed cameras

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20

I hope you DO get in trouble for it. Anything up to five mph over the limit I might understand, but thirty mph over it? You clearly aren't mature enough to be in charge of a car. There are speed limits for very good reasons.

Reply 21

hobo06
A few months ago I drove past the same 2 policeman pointing a speed gun at me 2 days in a row. They were hidden on the brough of a hill, just before the limit goes from 30 to national, so I had already sped up to nearly 50 when I passed them (both times, I thought the chances of them being there 2 days in a row in the same spot at the same time were slim, I've never known it to happen before). I was a bit worried about it, waiting for 6 points on my licence, but got nothing. I have heard from many people that with the hand held guns they have to pull you over for it as the guns do not record anything but the speed, which is not enough evidence to prosecute later, so you should be fine.


thanks for your helpful advise there, best from experience. i'll rep ya :smile:


crypt0r
you are fine, if he has a hand held gun he has to pull you over and hand the ticket to you there and then. If its a van mounted camera or a static one then you can get it in the post. This is comming from a policeman neighbour of mine when I asked him about exactly the same position with me


what's a static one?! thanks for your advise too, i'll rep you tomorrow. you two were nice enough not to judge

... and whoever said i'm immature etc yada yada, i'm not. even if i'm a fast driver, i am a safe one and always stay within my boundaries. if i know i might be in danger i will slow down, also nobody else was in the car so i'm not risking anyone else. i don't tailgate, i don't jump lights and i certainly don't drink.... i'm sure some of you may have done one of them so don't judge... thanks. rant over:yep:

Reply 22

*sweetness*
... and whoever said i'm immature etc yada yada, i'm not. even if i'm a fast driver, i am a safe one and always stay within my boundaries. if i know i might be in danger i will slow down, also nobody else was in the car so i'm not risking anyone else. i don't tailgate, i don't jump lights and i certainly don't drink.... i'm sure some of you may have done one of them so don't judge... thanks. rant over:yep:



It's great that you slow down if you think your own personal safety might be in danger, but I suppose it's tough **** if it's a pedestrian that ends up through your windscreen?

Reply 23

FyreFight
It's great that you slow down if you think your own personal safety might be in danger, but I suppose it's tough **** if it's a pedestrian that ends up through your windscreen?


it was a bare A road at 11.30 at night, no one would be walking across it

Reply 24

*sweetness*
it was a bare A road at 11.30 at night, no one would be walking across it


You never know. Plus it doesn't matter.
I have no time for people like you. You honestly deserve everything you get.
end rant.

Reply 25

*sweetness*
it was a bare A road at 11.30 at night, no one would be walking across it




Like VengefulSpoon, I knew someone who died on his way home from our local late at night because some idiot thought just what you say here.

Reply 26

*sweetness*
it was a bare A road at 11.30 at night, no one would be walking across it

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7636577.stm
Nobody would have expected this to happen, either.

Reply 27

*sweetness*
thanks for your helpful advise there, best from experience. i'll rep ya :smile:




what's a static one?! thanks for your advise too, i'll rep you tomorrow. you two were nice enough not to judge

... and whoever said i'm immature etc yada yada, i'm not. even if i'm a fast driver, i am a safe one and always stay within my boundaries. if i know i might be in danger i will slow down, also nobody else was in the car so i'm not risking anyone else. i don't tailgate, i don't jump lights and i certainly don't drink.... i'm sure some of you may have done one of them so don't judge... thanks. rant over:yep:


By static I meant the big yellow ones stuck into the ground. I wouldn't judge cause I dont drive that slow either, but I do drive safely and I know how crap you will be feeling at the thought that you might have been caught.

Reply 28

Mad Vlad
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7636577.stm
Nobody would have expected this to happen, either.


That though, is their own damned fault for playing with death.

The National Traffic Control Centre, Police, and motorists are all to be commended.

ps. op, you were a mong, you were driving dangerously fast, you could have killed somebody, but you didn't.

So stop making excuses, learn from it, and be happy that nobody is dead, you still have your license, and that you aren't facing manslaughter charges and about to become some lezzers prison bitch :smile:

Reply 29

samba
That though, is their own damned fault for playing with death.

The National Traffic Control Centre, Police, and motorists are all to be commended.

ps. op, you were a mong, you were driving dangerously fast, you could have killed somebody, but you didn't.

So stop making excuses, learn from it, and be happy that nobody is dead, you still have your license, and that you aren't facing manslaughter charges and about to become some lezzers prison bitch :smile:


lol:woo:

i know, just was getting pissed at the criticism when i asked for none

Reply 30

*sweetness*


... and whoever said i'm immature etc yada yada, i'm not. even if i'm a fast driver, i am a safe one and always stay within my boundaries. if i know i might be in danger i will slow down, also nobody else was in the car so i'm not risking anyone else. i don't tailgate, i don't jump lights and i certainly don't drink.... i'm sure some of you may have done one of them so don't judge... thanks. rant over:yep:



You are immature, and you are unsafe. Driving at twice the limit is not safe no matter how vehemently you say it or how often you repeat it. Happily, I feel in a safe enough position to judge, as I don't do any of those things. The thing is, you ARE risking the safety of others. It doesn't matter that you don't have someone in the car, it matters that there may well be someone walking along the road who you don't notice until it's too late. As it was a 40 limit, then I would think it quite likely that there would be people around.

Reply 31

Charlski
You are immature, and you are unsafe. Driving at twice the limit is not safe no matter how vehemently you say it or how often you repeat it. Happily, I feel in a safe enough position to judge, as I don't do any of those things. The thing is, you ARE risking the safety of others. It doesn't matter that you don't have someone in the car, it matters that there may well be someone walking along the road who you don't notice until it's too late. As it was a 40 limit, then I would think it quite likely that there would be people around.


I am going to defend driving fast and I know I am going to get flamed for it....
The speed limits were introduced around 60 years ago and amended at least 40 years ago to bring in the 70 mph top speed. This was at a time when there was no abs, no airbags, no crumple zones (to protect the car and those being hit), the cars were heavier and the breaks generally worse. As proven in top gear (I admit was a £120000 car) that it is possible to go at 120mph and stop in half the distance that the highway code states.
In the two things that make this possible are lighter cars (so less inertia when stopping) and better breaks. Hardly any cars will stop in that distance and that speed but it is an extreme case to prove a point.
What I am saying is the speed limits are too low and should all be raised because it is safe to do so. The increase in technology over the past 40 years has made driving safer for both drivers/passengers and potential victims of an accident.

Reply 32

crypt0r
I am going to defend driving fast and I know I am going to get flamed for it....
The speed limits were introduced around 60 years ago and amended at least 40 years ago to bring in the 70 mph top speed. This was at a time when there was no abs, no airbags, no crumple zones (to protect the car and those being hit), the cars were heavier and the breaks generally worse. As proven in top gear (I admit was a £120000 car) that it is possible to go at 120mph and stop in half the distance that the highway code states.
In the two things that make this possible are lighter cars (so less inertia when stopping) and better breaks. Hardly any cars will stop in that distance and that speed but it is an extreme case to prove a point.
What I am saying is the speed limits are too low and should all be raised because it is safe to do so. The increase in technology over the past 40 years has made driving safer for both drivers/passengers and potential victims of an accident.




As someone who drives both a 1934 car and a modern car, I can honestly say that the difference in emergency stops really is not that huge. It doesn't take me much longer to come to a halt in my Austin than it does at the same speed in my modern car. The point is that if you hit someone at 60 or 70, they will most likely die. You may well not see them until it is too late, thus, the 40 limit is sensible as it is generally where you might expect to see people. I don't think that really one can justify doing 70 in an area which should be a 40 limit.

Reply 33

crypt0r
I am going to defend driving fast and I know I am going to get flamed for it....
The speed limits were introduced around 60 years ago and amended at least 40 years ago to bring in the 70 mph top speed. This was at a time when there was no abs, no airbags, no crumple zones (to protect the car and those being hit), the cars were heavier and the breaks generally worse. As proven in top gear (I admit was a £120000 car) that it is possible to go at 120mph and stop in half the distance that the highway code states.
In the two things that make this possible are lighter cars (so less inertia when stopping) and better breaks. Hardly any cars will stop in that distance and that speed but it is an extreme case to prove a point.
What I am saying is the speed limits are too low and should all be raised because it is safe to do so. The increase in technology over the past 40 years has made driving safer for both drivers/passengers and potential victims of an accident.

Figures show that fatalities on the UK's roads are at their lowest that they've ever been. We have the safest roads in Europe by a long way, and you want to make the roads LESS safe by increasing the speed limit? And your only justification for this inevitable increase in accidents, injuries and fatalities, is that you want to get to your destination a little quicker?

I think we'll file this idea under, "probably not".

Reply 34

*sweetness*
ok, just got back from being out, and i was doing about 60-70mph ish in a 40 zone, i didnt see him til i was really close coz its dark.


That could've been a lot, lot worse.

Reply 35

Doing 42mph in a40mph zone clocked by a policem an on the side of the dual carriage way which is usually 60 but this is a restricted zone at the moment cause of roadworks really worried will I get a ticket

Reply 36

You should start a new thread and not post on one from 7 years ago, but if you were doing 42 in a 40 you have nothing to worry about. For a start, speedometers read fast, so if it showed 42 you were probably doing less than 40 in reality. Secondly the guidelines for prosecution give some leaway (10% + 2mph), which you were well under even if that was your actual speed (46 is the prosecution threshold in a 40 limit). Keep in mind these are guidelines, not actual rules, so 41mph in a 40limit is illegal and could be prosecuted, but it's very unlikely. Finally, where a policeman is on the side of the road they (or a college further down the road) have to pull you over, since they just record speed and don't take a photo. If you didn't get stopped, you won't get a ticket. Since they have to pull anyone over they want to ticket, they will tend to wait for those who are a risk, since pulling over those who are technically breaking the law wastes time when those who are driving well over the limit or doing other dangerous things can get away.

Reply 37

It's ****ing stupid, but you probably will get away with it.

Reply 38

People are very quick to judge, you seem like a decent person, avoid negative people, be strong and remember good things happen to good people, karma is a mother fu..., we all make mistakes, that doesn’t mean you are a bad person, peace and love
Original post
by James khan
People are very quick to judge, you seem like a decent person, avoid negative people, be strong and remember good things happen to good people, karma is a mother fu..., we all make mistakes, that doesn’t mean you are a bad person, peace and love

This thread is 12 years old. Please check the post dates before replying as you could be bumping very out of date info.

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.