Decision: Accepted by original college
Predicted Decision: I'm honestly neutral
Course: Mathematics
College (original college, plus fishing college if pooled): Trinity
Offer conditions: 1S STEP II and III in any order
By what method did you hear (Email/Letter/UCAS/owl): Email
Where were you when you heard: Outside
Optional (but preferable!)
Home, EU or International (Country): International
School Type (Private/State/Grammar/Other): Private
GCSE Grades: none
AS Subjects & Grades (include UMS if you have it): none
A2 Subjects & Predicted Grades : A*A*A*
Other: Some language tests
Reflection
Strengths: My interview went very well, answering every single question that interviewers gave me. I was able to guide them through my steps and apart from some asinine mistakes (such as saying that discriminant should be less than 0 for roots to exist) nothing was wrong. I was confident in my Maths abilities before starting the interview, but did not expect to perform that well.
Weaknesses: Perhaps I was talking too much, sometimes interrupting interviewers halfway through what they had to say (I didn't do it on purpose, I was genuinely a bit stressed so sometimes my brain just got over focused on the question, so I was ignoring the surrounding, imagining how to solve the problem, and once I got the idea I simply stated proposing it without understanding that they were talking to me)
Interview Assessment: 7-8
Why did you choose your college? I just went for the best Maths college tbh.
What other universities did you apply to? Imperial, LSE, UCL, KCL
If you were accepted, what is going to be your Insurance choice? Depends
If you were rejected, which university is benefiting from Cambridge’s huge oversight? Imperial/LSE
General Comments & Advice for others: There is so much I'd like to say about the application to Cambridge (or Oxbridge in general) but I won't be writing very long paragraphs in here. I will outline my experience with application, adding comment at the end.
My interview was genuinely amazing. Not because of my performance, but because of the experience itself. Interviewers were amazing men and I adored it so much when after joining the interview they were discussing some infinite series question (presumably from the previous interviewee). It was obvious they love the subject, and I could relate. What possibly made me stand out amongst other applicants is that I genuinely love maths. Funny thing is I have been working on it for the past 2 years only. Before it, I had never ever opened a Maths textbook, ever in my life. Don't advice doing it though, as I can't really count number of all-nighters I have pulled during my AS just to understand what in the **** is that straight line equation. I am very proud with what I achieved so far, and am gladly exploring Abstract Algebra and Spivak's Calculus proofs in my free time now. The trick is to be genuinely interested in the subject. Apply for it out of sheer will, and the feeling of excitement with that subject's exploration for the rest of your life. You gotta be truly ebullient. Don't pretend to feel all of it tho! (which is the reason I'm on a gap year, since that's what I did last year).
Honestly, I couldn't give less of a sh!t whether I'm accepted or not. I am also confident that Oxbridge is way overhyped and doesn't worth the hustle that is going around you. If you want to stay in academia/science world - year, Oxbridge is the best thing for you. Politics ? It's well too, but not as much. Other things - literally, almost worthless. Don't focus on going to Oxbridge since, most likely, you are overwhelmed by its status and not considering its potential usefulness to you. It's especially true in such countries as mine, where there is a cult around Oxbridge, which place those institutions up on mt. Olympus, somewhere in sight of Zeus' throne. Don't be swept by it, and trust me that in most cases, Oxbridge doesn't worth it and you will get much better education (yes, education, that's right, academically) and personal experience in literally any other uni. I know people who graduated with 1st honours from Natsci, Economics, and some other departments of Oxbridge and after leaving uni they had no idea what to do. Oxbridge provided them with a **** tone of inutile information, enhanced with tight deadlines and very advanced stuff, but they lacked what is the most important thing in the job world - ability to adapt and exist in society. At the same time, one of the guys (call him G) I know through out common friend graduated from local uni in my country, it's not even listed in QS world ranking and is sitting somewhere after 10000th place in the world. He owns a huge data centre in Switzerland, making millions in a week. Of course, this guy is a huge outlier from statistics and, on average, Oxbridge graduate would make 20x more than average graduate of that uni. Point is, to each its own. Don't go after Oxbridge just because its Oxbridge. Turn your own brain sometimes and think: "Do I need this bullsh!t for the next 4 years?". I can tell you for the fact, if G went to Oxbridge, he would never become that successful.
Think wisely, guys and gals. Whatever your ultimate goal is, I genuinely wish you all the best achieving it. I hope the university journey will help you understand what do you want and how do you get it.