Back
to top
fp3 hypobolic functions,
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
I think the differentiation in the first line should be positive, d(cosecx)/dx=-cosecxcotx, as there are 2 sine and according to the Osborn's rule, so I think d(cosechx)/dx =cosechxcothx, but the answer is negative, why is that?
0
reply
ram8_
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
Differentiate using quotient rule so you can see more clearly where the negative comes from
1
reply
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
thanks but why I cannot apply the osborn's rule here? is this method not available or my working has mistakes?
Last edited by Hedwigeeeee; 1 year ago
0
reply
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
(Original post by ram8_)
Differentiate using quotient rule so you can see more clearly where the negative comes from
Differentiate using quotient rule so you can see more clearly where the negative comes from
0
reply
ram8_
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
(Original post by Hedwigeeeee)
because if I use the osborn rule it seems that as there are two sines, so we should change the sign to positive
because if I use the osborn rule it seems that as there are two sines, so we should change the sign to positive
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges:
19
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by Hedwigeeeee)
thanks but why I cannot apply the osborn's rule here? is this method not available or my working has mistakes?
thanks but why I cannot apply the osborn's rule here? is this method not available or my working has mistakes?
0
reply
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
(Original post by ram8_)
You don't need to use that rule? It's only for trying to work out an equivalent identity for hyperbolics
You don't need to use that rule? It's only for trying to work out an equivalent identity for hyperbolics
0
reply
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
(Original post by mqb2766)
You can't use that rule using calculus. Stuff starts to become imaginary.
You can't use that rule using calculus. Stuff starts to become imaginary.
0
reply
ghostwalker
Badges:
17
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report
#9
1
reply
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
I mean there are two sines in cosechx(1/sinhx) and cothx(coshx/ sinhx), so it is sinh^2, so I think we should change the sign. though it is true that if we do not use the Osborn's rule, the sign will not change.
0
reply
ram8_
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Hedwigeeeee
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
(Original post by ram8_)
I think you are getting confused about Osborn's rule
I think you are getting confused about Osborn's rule
0
reply
ram8_
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report
#13
It's for converting a non-hyperbolic trigonometric identity into an equivalent hyperbolic one. So it would swap signs for when there's a product of two sines, so the sinh version with be the opposite sign, e.g. cos^2(x) - sin^2(x) will be cosh^2(x) + sinh^2(x). You wouldn't need to use it for this problem as it is just differentiating. You can also confirm this by multiplying two sinh(x)'s in its exponential form.
0
reply
davros
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#14
Report
#14
(Original post by Hedwigeeeee)
could you tell me what is wrong in my method
could you tell me what is wrong in my method
Osborn's rule allows you to convert a trigonometric identity into an equivalent hyperbolic identity. It has nothing to do with differentiation!
Seriously, forget all about it! I think I saw Osborn's rule once when I first learnt hyperbolics and then never used it again - it's as easy to derive the identities directly as it is to remember the correct conditions for applying the rule
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
