SapphirePhoenix1
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 days ago
#1
Hey. Can anyone help me solve the below for n?

0.012n2 + 0.108n = 1.12n - 1

I tried using logs but I don't seem to be getting anywhere

Name:  logs.png
Views: 7
Size:  147.3 KB

p.s. I know what the numerical answer is
Attached files
Last edited by SapphirePhoenix1; 2 days ago
0
reply
Pangol
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 days ago
#2
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Hey. Can anyone help me solve the below for n?

0.012n2 + 0.108n = 1.12n - 1

I tried using logs but I don't seem to be getting anywhere

Name:  logs.png
Views: 7
Size:  147.3 KB

p.s. I know what the numerical answer is
Not an idea as to how to solve - I'll have a think about that - but in your second line, you have used the idea that log(A + B) = log(A) + log(B). Is this correct?
0
reply
SapphirePhoenix1
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 2 days ago
#3
(Original post by Pangol)
Not an idea as to how to solve - I'll have a think about that - but in your second line, you have used the idea that log(A + B) = log(A) + log(B). Is this correct?
Hey,

Yep, that's correct
0
reply
RogerOxon
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#4
Report 2 days ago
#4
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Hey,

Yep, that's correct
No, it isn't!
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#5
Report 2 days ago
#5
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Hey. Can anyone help me solve the below for n?

0.012n2 + 0.108n = 1.12n - 1

I tried using logs but I don't seem to be getting anywhere

Name:  logs.png
Views: 7
Size:  147.3 KB

p.s. I know what the numerical answer is
There is two trivial answers ... Where does the question come from?
I'd be surprised if there was a traditional derived solution.
Last edited by mqb2766; 2 days ago
0
reply
SapphirePhoenix1
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#6
Report Thread starter 2 days ago
#6
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Hey. Can anyone help me solve the below for n?

0.012n2 + 0.108n = 1.12n - 1

I tried using logs but I don't seem to be getting anywhere

Name:  logs.png
Views: 7
Size:  147.3 KB

p.s. I know what the numerical answer is
Update:
Name:  logs(2).png
Views: 3
Size:  164.8 KB
0
reply
Pangol
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#7
Report 2 days ago
#7
I can't think of any analytical way to do this. As mqb2766 says, there is a trivial solution - well, two - but graphing the function shows that there are three solutions altogether. It's possible that an itterative method would converge to that one with a suitable starting point. Perhaps someone cleverer than me can find an elementry way to solve this, but I can't see it, and mixtures of polynomials and powers don't often yield to them.
Last edited by Pangol; 2 days ago
0
reply
Pangol
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#8
Report 2 days ago
#8
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Update:
Name:  logs(2).png
Views: 3
Size:  164.8 KB
You've got the same problem as soon as you take logs. log(A + B) is not the same as log(A) + log(B)
0
reply
SapphirePhoenix1
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 2 days ago
#9
(Original post by Pangol)
I can't think of any analytical way to do this. As mqb2766 says, there is a trivial solution - well, two - but graphing the function shows that there are three solutions altogether. It's possible that an itterative method would converge to that one with a suitable starting point. Perhaps someone cleverer than me can find an elementry way to solve this, but I can't see it, and mixtured of polynomials and powers don't often yield to them.
Yeah, I tried graphing it on my calculator and it gave me the numerical answer I was given by my teacher.

Thanks anyway
0
reply
SapphirePhoenix1
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#10
Report Thread starter 2 days ago
#10
(Original post by Pangol)
You've got the same problem as soon as you take logs. log(A + B) is not the same as log(A) + log(B)
Yeah I know. I just changed log n2 in line 2 to 2logn
0
reply
Pangol
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#11
Report 2 days ago
#11
(Original post by SapphirePhoenix1)
Yeah I know. I just changed log n2 in line 2 to 2logn
Just to be sure - you do realise it's a bigger problem than this? You cannot go from 0.012n2 + 0.108n = 1.12n - 1 to log(0.012n2) + log(0.108n) = log(1.12n) - log(1).

Anyway, an iterative method does seem to work. If you rearrange to make the n which is tied up in the 1.12n term the subject of the equation and use a starting point larger than 1, it converges to the other solution.
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#12
Report 2 days ago
#12
As Pangol said, there isn't generally a solution to problems which mix exponential and polynomials. In this case, for small n, you have a couple of easy solutions by simply coefficient spotting,.. Then a larger one where the exponential catches back up with the quadratic as the base is just slightly >1.
Last edited by mqb2766; 2 days ago
1
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you experienced financial difficulties as a student due to Covid-19?

Yes, I have really struggled financially (18)
13.74%
I have experienced some financial difficulties (31)
23.66%
I haven't experienced any financial difficulties and things have stayed the same (58)
44.27%
I have had better financial opportunities as a result of the pandemic (20)
15.27%
I've had another experience (let us know in the thread!) (4)
3.05%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed