Richard Leonard quits as Scottish Labour leader
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Richard Leonard has stepped down from leading the Scottish Labour Party, just months ahead of the Scottish Parliament election.
This appears to have come as a shock to MSPs, but Leonard has faced criticism over his leadership style and his close association with Jeremy Corbyn. Polls have also suggested that Scottish Labour members struggle to recognise him, the BBC reports.
This appears to have come as a shock to MSPs, but Leonard has faced criticism over his leadership style and his close association with Jeremy Corbyn. Polls have also suggested that Scottish Labour members struggle to recognise him, the BBC reports.
0
reply
Report
#2
[Insert meme of Alan Partridge shrugging here]
I mean, he's been pretty woeful, but so have most of his predecessors. The Labour Party really needs some semblance of strategy in Scotland, because it's been conspicuous by its absence since about 2007.
There's maybe a wider point on recognition: there's less scope for opposition politicians to make themselves known. How often has Ed Davey been on the telly? It's dominated by Boris - and, in a Scottish context, Sturgeon, who are everywhere. It's not that oppositions aren't saying anything, it's that no-one's engaging.
I mean, he's been pretty woeful, but so have most of his predecessors. The Labour Party really needs some semblance of strategy in Scotland, because it's been conspicuous by its absence since about 2007.
There's maybe a wider point on recognition: there's less scope for opposition politicians to make themselves known. How often has Ed Davey been on the telly? It's dominated by Boris - and, in a Scottish context, Sturgeon, who are everywhere. It's not that oppositions aren't saying anything, it's that no-one's engaging.
2
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by L i b)
[Insert meme of Alan Partridge shrugging here]
I mean, he's been pretty woeful, but so have most of his predecessors. The Labour Party really needs some semblance of strategy in Scotland, because it's been conspicuous by its absence since about 2007.
There's maybe a wider point on recognition: there's less scope for opposition politicians to make themselves known. How often has Ed Davey been on the telly? It's dominated by Boris - and, in a Scottish context, Sturgeon, who are everywhere. It's not that oppositions aren't saying anything, it's that no-one's engaging.
[Insert meme of Alan Partridge shrugging here]
I mean, he's been pretty woeful, but so have most of his predecessors. The Labour Party really needs some semblance of strategy in Scotland, because it's been conspicuous by its absence since about 2007.
There's maybe a wider point on recognition: there's less scope for opposition politicians to make themselves known. How often has Ed Davey been on the telly? It's dominated by Boris - and, in a Scottish context, Sturgeon, who are everywhere. It's not that oppositions aren't saying anything, it's that no-one's engaging.
0
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by imlikeahermit)
Should just fold the party up there and save a few quid.
Should just fold the party up there and save a few quid.
(Original post by Rakas21)
Can they actually develop a coherent strategy though. SLabour are finished if they don't fight for the union, the Westminster party cannot govern this side of 2029 without the SNP and so no doubt undermine the Scottish party.
Can they actually develop a coherent strategy though. SLabour are finished if they don't fight for the union, the Westminster party cannot govern this side of 2029 without the SNP and so no doubt undermine the Scottish party.
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by Rakas21)
Can they actually develop a coherent strategy though. SLabour are finished if they don't fight for the union, the Westminster party cannot govern this side of 2029 without the SNP and so no doubt undermine the Scottish party.
Can they actually develop a coherent strategy though. SLabour are finished if they don't fight for the union, the Westminster party cannot govern this side of 2029 without the SNP and so no doubt undermine the Scottish party.
The problem is that the vast majority of their parliamentarians aren't where they need to be positioned. They are actually pretty solid on the pro-UK stuff - unsurprisingly - so the appeals to a sort of moderate Scottish nationalism with the union existing to serve the interests of Scotland come across as a bit insincere. Trying to avoid the constitutional question altogether, when it's really the only show in town at the moment, seems like cheap trickery.
They're the agents of their own misfortune, certainly - they rode the tiger of soft nationalism in the 80s and 90s, they made the SNP look like an acceptable alternative. But that's very much the past. I think their strategy now has to be aimed not at winning elections now, but about where they're going to be ten years from now.
0
reply
Report
#7
Really struggling to see the point of Scottish Labour. They're on the wrong side of the independence argument for a lot of the left, and politically the SNP just walk all over them. I'm not sure if this is all down to Leonard, though, and can't really see a change of leader having much impact for the next Holyrood election.
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by Smack)
Really struggling to see the point of Scottish Labour. They're on the wrong side of the independence argument for a lot of the left, and politically the SNP just walk all over them. I'm not sure if this is all down to Leonard, though, and can't really see a change of leader having much impact for the next Holyrood election.
Really struggling to see the point of Scottish Labour. They're on the wrong side of the independence argument for a lot of the left, and politically the SNP just walk all over them. I'm not sure if this is all down to Leonard, though, and can't really see a change of leader having much impact for the next Holyrood election.
I do think they should be trying to pick off soft-nationalists, sure, but if they compromise their principles on being pro-UK then two things will happen: firstly, Labour across the UK will look ridiculous and will never get into government. Secondly, they'll not only lose their core support, but they'll soon find themselves once again seeming like opportunists when the political pendulum swings against the SNP.
1
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by L i b)
A lot of the Scottish left are only advertising themselves as such to seem a bit more cuddily - most of them are nationalists, not socialists or even really social democrats. They come from a starting point of separatism and everything else is just a convenient guise.
I do think they should be trying to pick off soft-nationalists, sure, but if they compromise their principles on being pro-UK then two things will happen: firstly, Labour across the UK will look ridiculous and will never get into government. Secondly, they'll not only lose their core support, but they'll soon find themselves once again seeming like opportunists when the political pendulum swings against the SNP.
A lot of the Scottish left are only advertising themselves as such to seem a bit more cuddily - most of them are nationalists, not socialists or even really social democrats. They come from a starting point of separatism and everything else is just a convenient guise.
I do think they should be trying to pick off soft-nationalists, sure, but if they compromise their principles on being pro-UK then two things will happen: firstly, Labour across the UK will look ridiculous and will never get into government. Secondly, they'll not only lose their core support, but they'll soon find themselves once again seeming like opportunists when the political pendulum swings against the SNP.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by Smack)
A lot of the Scottish left are also primarily nationalist, and many that are genuinely left of centre are using independence as a vehicle for a more left-wing country. I simply don't see any way back for Scottish Labour at this point: after ten years of Tories it's very difficult to argue to remain in the UK if you're after a left-wing government.
A lot of the Scottish left are also primarily nationalist, and many that are genuinely left of centre are using independence as a vehicle for a more left-wing country. I simply don't see any way back for Scottish Labour at this point: after ten years of Tories it's very difficult to argue to remain in the UK if you're after a left-wing government.
Why did Scotland leave labour at the time when we moved significantly to the left?
Why are the Tories gaining in popularity in Scotland in comparison to labour?
I don't get it and I don't buy the labour are too right wing and/or too unionist for Scotland, it doesn't make sense. Labour are the only party that do (or have done) anything positive for Scotland. The SNP are so disingenuous its unbelievable but they get away with it.
1
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by Burton Bridge)
I realise you might not be saying this but the general message I get is, it's all about left vs right ideologies in Scotland with Labour losing popularity because they are seen as right or center wing unionist party, explain this to me please.
Why did Scotland leave labour at the time when we moved significantly to the left?
Why are the Tories gaining in popularity in Scotland in comparison to labour?
I don't get it and I don't buy the labour are too right wing and/or too unionist for Scotland, it doesn't make sense. Labour are the only party that do (or have done) anything positive for Scotland. The SNP are so disingenuous its unbelievable but they get away with it.
I realise you might not be saying this but the general message I get is, it's all about left vs right ideologies in Scotland with Labour losing popularity because they are seen as right or center wing unionist party, explain this to me please.
Why did Scotland leave labour at the time when we moved significantly to the left?
Why are the Tories gaining in popularity in Scotland in comparison to labour?
I don't get it and I don't buy the labour are too right wing and/or too unionist for Scotland, it doesn't make sense. Labour are the only party that do (or have done) anything positive for Scotland. The SNP are so disingenuous its unbelievable but they get away with it.
I'm not sure if the Tories are gaining popularity either. In fact I think they have stalled for a few years now, possibly going into reverse; the next Holyrood election will tell.
1
reply
Report
#12
Unfortunately Covid screwed the Tories in Scotland, we were looking odds on for polling gains beforehand.
1
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by Rakas21)
Unfortunately Covid screwed the Tories in Scotland, we were looking odds on for polling gains beforehand.
Unfortunately Covid screwed the Tories in Scotland, we were looking odds on for polling gains beforehand.
But let's not forget that the party's weaknesses in Scotland are still all-too-apparent. Its policy direction seems to be designed to please no-one in particular and annoy quite a vast swathe of the population. Its organisation is what you'd expect of a third or fourth party, not the main opposition party in a country. It takes easy positions over tough ones and its communications strategy is about 20 years behind the SNP.
The SNP is the only professionally operating political machine in Scotland at the moment, whereas the rest seem stuck somewhere between the late 80s and the early 90s - and completely unaffected by the modernisation that their UK parties have undergone in terms of campaigning and messaging.
Last edited by L i b; 1 month ago
0
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by Burton Bridge)
I realise you might not be saying this but the general message I get is, it's all about left vs right ideologies in Scotland with Labour losing popularity because they are seen as right or center wing unionist party, explain this to me please.
Why did Scotland leave labour at the time when we moved significantly to the left?
I realise you might not be saying this but the general message I get is, it's all about left vs right ideologies in Scotland with Labour losing popularity because they are seen as right or center wing unionist party, explain this to me please.
Why did Scotland leave labour at the time when we moved significantly to the left?
Since then, they've tried every combination going. Their most pitiable performance came under Corbyn at UK level and Richard Leonard, very much on the left of the party, as the Scottish leader.
The reasons have very little to do with left or right, although I'd argue that small-c conservatism is a very, very powerful force in Scotland - and presenting a proper left-wing agenda here would shaft you right over.
Why are the Tories gaining in popularity in Scotland in comparison to labour?
I don't get it and I don't buy the labour are too right wing and/or too unionist for Scotland, it doesn't make sense. Labour are the only party that do (or have done) anything positive for Scotland. The SNP are so disingenuous its unbelievable but they get away with it.
Had they been unambiguously centrist, they might have gathered a coalition of sensible people across the constitutional divide. Had they been unambiguously unionists, they might have kept their votes from the Tories and even won over Tories and Lib Dems who would - after 2014 - have been persuaded to back the strongest unionist voice against the SNP.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top