Moments - What stupid mistake am I making ?

#1
I have calculated the mass of the rock is zero, as taking moments about C:

With anticlockwise being positive,

60 - 60 - 2W = 0

So 2W = 0
So W = 0.

This obviously is incorrect. But where is my mistake ?

Thanks.
0
1 year ago
#2
(Original post by seals2001)
I have calculated the mass of the rock is zero, as taking moments about C:

With anticlockwise being positive,

60 - 60 - 2W = 0

So 2W = 0
So W = 0.

This obviously is incorrect. But where is my mistake ?

Thanks.
About what point have you taken moments, and what do each of your terms/numbers represent?
0
#3
(Original post by ghostwalker)
About what point have you taken moments, and what do each of your terms/numbers represent?
Hi there, I took moments about C and said that anticlockwise is positive.

(80 * 0.75) - (0.5 * 120) - 2W = 0

So W = 0.
0
1 year ago
#4
(Original post by ghostwalker)
About what point have you taken moments, and what do each of your terms/numbers represent?
The OP states they are taking moments about C for some reason ...
0
#5
(Original post by Muttley79)
The OP states they are taking moments about C for some reason ...
Hi, why is this wrong ? The plank is at equilibrium.
0
1 year ago
#6
What does 'on the point of tipping about D' mean?
0
1 year ago
#7
The problem is that this question is about limiting equilibrium. What does that mean?
Last edited by Aloe Striata; 1 year ago
0
#8
(Original post by Muttley79)
What does 'on the point of tipping about D' mean?
I am not too sure about this actually. I have looked it up but cant find any videos on it.
0
1 year ago
#9
As the plank is on the point of tilting about D, are the reaction forces staying the same?
Last edited by Beobobo; 1 year ago
0
1 year ago
#10
(Original post by seals2001)
I am not too sure about this actually. I have looked it up but cant find any videos on it.
when you place something at two points:
say the left pen is C and the right one is D and the yellow pen is the plank.
then I tilt the plank about D:

is the plank in contact with the support C? or not? what does that mean?
1
1 year ago
#11
(Original post by Beobobo)
As the plank is on the point of tilting about D, I think the reaction at D is no longer 80 N anymore? It should be larger than 80 N as the force of reaction at C is now 0 N. That's why when you take the moment at C using 80 N as the force of reaction at D, the result is wrong. Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong.
You're correct, just don't give too much away right now let OP think
0
#12
(Original post by ilovephysmath)
The problem is that this question is about limiting equilibrium. What does that mean?
I am not sure,

(Original post by ilovephysmath)
when you place something at two points:
say the left pen is C and the right one is D and the yellow pen is the plank.
then I tilt the plank about D:

is the plank in contact with the support C? or not? what does that mean?
Would the contact force at C be equal to 0 ? As the plank is not in contact with it anymore ? Is that what the plank is on the "point of tilting" at C means; that it is an infinitesimally small distance away from the plank , such that it loses the contact it had with it at that point ?
0
1 year ago
#13
(Original post by ilovephysmath)
You're correct, just don't give too much away right now let OP think
Thank you! I've edited my post
1
1 year ago
#14
(Original post by seals2001)
Would the contact force at C be equal to 0 ? As the plank is not in contact with it anymore ? Is that what the plank is on the "point of tilting" at C means; that it is an infinitesimally small distance away from the plank , such that it loses the contact it had with it at that point ?
Bingo
0
1 year ago
#15
you cant take moments at c. the plank is at point of tilting
0
#16
(Original post by ilovephysmath)
Bingo
That seems like an incredibly specific scenario that is not actually possible to achieve. Am I right in saying this ?

Btw you gave an amazing explanation, thank you !
0
1 year ago
#17
(Original post by seals2001)
That seems like an incredibly specific scenario that is not actually possible to achieve. Am I right in saying this ?

Btw you gave an amazing explanation, thank you !
I'm assuming OP's question is year 12 mechanics. we make a lot of assumptions at this stage that are nowhere near reality for example we assume air resistance to be zero or negligible in physics while that's not actually the case unless there's perfect vacuum but we also need to be aware of what assumptions the spec wants us to make because in reality we might be correct but we won't get the mark so detailed study is key

also OP, try taking moments about D or A. Your call, try either.
0
#18
(Original post by ilovephysmath)
I'm assuming OP's question is year 12 mechanics. we make a lot of assumptions at this stage that are nowhere near reality for example we assume air resistance to be zero or negligible in physics while that's not actually the case unless there's perfect vacuum but we also need to be aware of what assumptions the spec wants us to make because in reality we might be correct but we won't get the mark so detailed study is key

also OP, try taking moments about D or A. Your call, try either.
I got the right answer, thank you
0
1 year ago
#19
(Original post by seals2001)
I got the right answer, thank you
you're welcome
0
1 year ago
#20
(Original post by seals2001)
I got the right answer, thank you
Also I just realized you're the OP lmao 😂
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

Poll

Join the discussion

Does school Maths prepare people well enough for the future?

Yes, it gives everyone a good foundation for any future path (50)
30.12%
Somewhat, if your future involves maths/STEM (73)
43.98%
No, it doesn't teach enough practical life skills (41)
24.7%
Something else (tell us in the thread) (2)
1.2%