The Student Room Group

Archaeology reading Vs Southampton

I know that Southampton has a better reputation and is a Russell group but I like the modules at reading more. I also want to go on to do a master's in forensic archaeology or anthropology.

If anyone has studied archeology at either of these could you tell me what the department is like?
(edited 4 years ago)

Reply 1

For a niche subject like Archaeology it isnt going to make much difference.
If you prefer the course at Reading, go with it.

Reply 2

Original post
by McGinger
For a niche subject like Archaeology it isnt going to make much difference.
If you prefer the course at Reading, go with it.

Yeah I think I might. And I read that it has like the 2nd most research output for archaeology in the UK so I guess it not being a Russell group doesn't really matter anyway.

Reply 3

It wont.
Many people on TSR get fixated on this, and really its something that only school-leavers obsess about.
For Archaeology its irrelevant - any jobs you get within that field will be because of the specialisms/interests that you developed within your degree and the work-experience and field work you did, not 'which Uni'.

Reply 4

Original post
by McGinger
It wont.
Many people on TSR get fixated on this, and really its something that only school-leavers obsess about.
For Archaeology its irrelevant - any jobs you get within that field will be because of the specialisms/interests that you developed within your degree and the work-experience and field work you did, not 'which Uni'.


I have to disagree somewhat - as you say, some universities offer different kinds of fieldwork, for different specialisms. So, you could be locking yourself out of certain fields by attending certain universities, and it's important to consider this. For example, one of my friends got to do fieldwork in a certain, which has led to a job there etc, and wouldn't have gotten it otherwise.

Reply 5

Original post
by Edminzodo
For example, one of my friends got to do fieldwork in a certain, which has led to a job there etc, and wouldn't have gotten it otherwise.

Yes, but they wouldn't have known that in advance of picking that Uni as a Firm choice would they.

Reply 6

Original post
by McGinger
Yes, but they wouldn't have known that in advance of picking that Uni as a Firm choice would they.


A lot of universities advertise and clearly state where students can go on digs. Just something to take into consideration.

Reply 7

Original post
by Edminzodo
A lot of universities advertise and clearly state where students can go on digs. Just something to take into consideration.

All Archaeology courses include practical fieldwork.

Reply 8

Original post
by McGinger
All Archaeology courses include practical fieldwork.


I know that, as I studied it myself. I am just pointing out that, if a student is interested in working in particular places, it is useful to look at where a university sends its students for practical fieldwork.

Reply 9

Original post
by Edminzodo
I know that, as I studied it myself. I am just pointing out that, if a student is interested in working in particular places, it is useful to look at where a university sends its students for practical fieldwork.

I'm not sure where I want to go for my fieldwork placement but I know that I want to do forensics archaeology/anthropology for it. In both reading and Southampton have done fieldwork in this in the past so I don't think that not being able to do the type of field work I want will be a problem. It's just that reading actually has a module in forensic archaeology/anthropology whereas Southampton only has modules in osteology/anatomy.
I also feel like I'm being pressured to go to Southampton because it's seen as the more 'prestigious.' It does seem to be a nice uni I don't like how it doesn't have a taught module in forensic archaeology/anthropology.

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.