Is $70/£70 for a video game too much?

Watch
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#1
If you haven't heard, basically the prices have been jacked up for this new generation with new AAA titles costing around 70 at launch

Is this too much for a game?
(the playstation boss doesn't seem to think so)
https://www.videogameschronicle.com/...ystation-boss/


What do you think?
0
reply
CoochieMan
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 month ago
#2
I personally think it's too much but it could be worth it I guess (doubt it though)
0
reply
Sabertooth
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 month ago
#3
Didn't N64 games cost £60 and that was a loooooooong time ago.
0
reply
JoshDarnIt_
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#4
Report 1 month ago
#4
My wallet was already crying prior to the increase
0
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#5
(Original post by Sabertooth)
Didn't N64 games cost £60 and that was a loooooooong time ago.
I remember paying £44.99 for FFX on release day 20 yrs ago, that was on PS2

I can't remember seeing PS2 games higher than £49.99 at that point ...although I didn't own a N64 so can't remember it's prices..
0
reply
DiddyDec
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 month ago
#6
That is insane, £50 feels too expensive as it is.
1
reply
username5600688
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 month ago
#7
It is. 60 is already too high. 50 is reasonable.
0
reply
ROTL94
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 month ago
#8
Yes, without a shadow of a doubt, I remember when they were £39.99.
0
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#9
(Original post by CoochieMan)
I personally think it's too much but it could be worth it I guess (doubt it though)
My first reaction was that it's too high, but then I think back to the 90s where Triple A titles were at least £39.99 at launch (possibly higher) and the majority of these games could be completed start to finish in an hour or less.

Most games these days are at least like 10 hours long, with many of them coming in at 30/40+

That's a huge increase in playability, and when you consider inflation ...I think for what we are actually getting it's not a bad deal at all..

but yes, on the surface £70 for 1 game does sound like a lot..
0
reply
Sabertooth
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 month ago
#10
(Original post by ANM775)
I remember paying £44.99 for FFX on release day 20 yrs ago, that was on PS2

I can't remember seeing PS2 games higher than £49.99 at that point ...although I didn't own a N64 so can't remember it's prices..
PS2 games were cheaper than N64 because CDs are cheaper than cartridges to produce. I remember Perfect Dark was so damn expensive.
1
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#11
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#11
(Original post by ROTL94)
Yes, without a shadow of a doubt, I remember when they were £39.99.
Think about it though, a game in the 90s cost £39.99

minimum wage in 1999 was £3.60

How long would it take a person on minimum wage to buy a game?, 12/13 hours work

a new game now will cost £70

Minimum wage now is £8.72

It will take someone on minimum wage 9 hours work to buy a game, and they're getting a game at least 10x as long as they were getting in the 90s , maybe even 30/40+X long


On the surface £70 per game seems bad, but when you really sit down and think about it .. it's really not......
Last edited by ANM775; 1 month ago
1
reply
ROTL94
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#12
Report 1 month ago
#12
(Original post by ANM775)
Think about it though, a game in the 90s cost £39.99

minimum wage in 1999 was £3.60

How long would it take a person on minimum wage to buy a game?, 13 hours work

a new game now will cost £70

Minimum wage now is £8.72

It will take someone on minimum wage 9 hours work to buy a game, and they're getting a game at least 10x as long as they were getting in the 90s , maybe even 30/40+X long


On the surface £70 per game seems bad, but when you really sit down and think about it .. it's really not......
It's still a whole day's wages spent on something that probably has a 10 hours and done storyline and more microtransactions than you can shake a stick at, just doesn't feel worth it, and like that £7- could be spent elsewhere on something more beneficial.
0
reply
username5252878
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#13
Report 1 month ago
#13
(Original post by ANM775)
If you haven't heard, basically the prices have been jacked up for this new generation with new AAA titles costing around 70 at launch

Is this too much for a game?
(the playstation boss doesn't seem to think so)
https://www.videogameschronicle.com/...ystation-boss/


What do you think?
Yes. You can buy 55 boxes of doughnuts for £70! Bargain. 😊
2
reply
ROTL94
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#14
Report 1 month ago
#14
(Original post by Thecrazydoughnut)
Yes. You can buy 55 boxes of doughnuts for £70! Bargain. 😊
I mean I know you're joking but that's a fantastic point, if you're on minimum wage then £70 is far too much when your rent, council tax, Internet, gas, and electric have gone out, need as much money for essentials as you can get.
0
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#15
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#15
(Original post by ROTL94)
I mean I know you're joking but that's a fantastic point, if you're on minimum wage then £70 is far too much when your rent, council tax, Internet, gas, and electric have gone out, need as much money for essentials as you can get.
Was that not the same situation when prices were £39.99 in the 90s. £39.99 in the 90s on minimum wage is gonna hurt just as bad

I think people are resistant to the change in price as game prices over the years have not increased very much. definitely less than inflation. and now that they are having a big increase people are thinking they're being short changed when in reality they're not.
0
reply
_gcx
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#16
Report 1 month ago
#16
It's scaled pretty well with inflation. I think some NES games were £40 which would be absolutely ludicrous inflation-adjusted. Gaming is much more accessible financially nowadays.

I wouldn't pay £70 for a game. My max is about £35. Ideally 20 something pound. I try to take advantage of sales and often buy games a year or two or more after release.
Last edited by _gcx; 1 month ago
1
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#17
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#17
(Original post by _gcx)
It's scaled pretty well with inflation. I think some NES games were £40 which would be absolutely ludicrous inflation-adjusted.

I wouldn't pay £70 for a game. My max is about £35. Ideally £2x or lower. I try to take advantage of sales and often buy games a year or two or more after release.
The most i've ever payed was £50 for Final Fantasy 7 remake
0
reply
_gcx
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#18
Report 1 month ago
#18
(Original post by ANM775)
The most i've ever payed was £50 for Final Fantasy 7 remake
When I used to get console games as xmas presents, a few probably were close to £50. (got a few collector's editions which definitely went over) But nowadays buying games by myself on steam/epic/battlenet I wouldn't ever pay full price. Most I've spent recently is about £30 on black ops cold war on a sale.
0
reply
wokirow
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#19
Report 1 month ago
#19
£60/£70 is honestly too much for a videogame. The only time I would pay that much is if there is a really nice collector's edition for a gaming franchise I'm heavily invested in (Nier, Final Fantasy). Otherwise, second hand or heavily discounted is where I'm at! I don't buy my videogames higher than £20.

Nintendo will always have my wallet crying though, none of their stuff ever goes on sale
0
reply
ANM775
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#20
(Original post by _gcx)
When I used to get console games as xmas presents, a few probably were close to £50. (got a few collector's editions which definitely went over) But nowadays buying games by myself on steam/epic/battlenet I wouldn't ever pay full price. Most I've spent recently is about £30 on black ops cold war on a sale.

In 2001 I payed £44.99 for Final Fantasy X on launch day

Inflation adjusted that's probably more than £70 today lol, but like you ...I probably wouldn't drop £70 on a game today. even though, in real terms i'd be spending less because of inflation. I think on a psychological level the £70 price point just seems too high..., but on a reality level I don't think it's too high (If that makes sense)
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

What factors affect your mental health the most right now?

Anxiousness about lockdown easing (73)
4.69%
Uncertainty around my education (238)
15.28%
Uncertainty around my future career prospects (169)
10.85%
Lack of purpose or motivation (221)
14.18%
Lack of support system (eg. teachers, counsellors, delays in care) (69)
4.43%
Impact of lockdown on physical health (91)
5.84%
Loneliness (138)
8.86%
Financial worries (54)
3.47%
Concern about myself or my loves ones getting/having been ill (70)
4.49%
Exposure to negative news/social media (75)
4.81%
Lack of real life entertainment (81)
5.2%
Lack of confidence in making big life decisions (135)
8.66%
Worry about missed opportunities during the pandemic (144)
9.24%

Watched Threads

View All