# Physics GCSE

#1
Desperately need someone to help me answer this question!

The initial temperature of a mixture was +20 degrees. The mixture froze at -1.5 degrees.
A total of 165 KJ of internal energy was transferred from the mixture to cool and freeze it.
specific latent heat= 3500 J/KJ degrees
specific latent heat of fusion of the mixture=255 000 J/Kg
Calculate the mass of the mixture.
0
1 year ago
#2
What have you tried, what do you know?

For cooling, think about specific latent heat. For mass,specific-latent-heat,temp-change,energy-transfer, you have

0
#3
(Original post by Callicious)
What have you tried, what do you know?

For cooling, think about specific latent heat. For mass,specific-latent-heat,temp-change,energy-transfer, you have

I was just confused on when the energy transferred is from the freezing process and cooling. As how do you put that into one of the equations when its from both of them...
0
1 year ago
#4
(Original post by Scarlett.sully)
I was just confused on when the energy transferred is from the freezing process and cooling. As how do you put that into one of the equations when its from both of them...
They give you 165 kJ and you have the from each of the processes individually. Both occur, and you can just assume the mass of the substance doesn't change.

Would it help if I told you that you had

0
#5
(Original post by Callicious)
They give you 165 kJ and you have the from each of the processes individually. Both occur, and you can just assume the mass of the substance doesn't change.

Would it help if I told you that you had

Yes that defiantly helped me understand the concept, however how do you guess or workout the mass if the energy transferred if the number is from both equations. so if you put it into the SHC, for example, it will also include the energy transferred is SLH, therefore not giving you the correct mass
0
1 year ago
#6
(Original post by Scarlett.sully)
Yes that defiantly helped me understand the concept, however how do you guess or workout the mass if the energy transferred if the number is from both equations. so if you put it into the SHC, for example, it will also include the energy transferred is SLH, therefore not giving you the correct mass
Mmm... take both the equations I gave, i.e.

and

for cooling/fusing respectively. Their sum (as mentioned) is the total heat transferred from the substance

I might have been a bit inexact with how I labelled my EQ's for you ( is different for fusing/cooling, equation-wise... I was just using the same to be lazy and assumed in context it'd be fine)

and you can redistribute via

where you can rearrange for .
0
#7
(Original post by Callicious)
Mmm... take both the equations I gave, i.e.

and

for cooling/fusing respectively. Their sum (as mentioned) is the total heat transferred from the substance

I might have been a bit inexact with how I labelled my EQ's for you ( is different for fusing/cooling, equation-wise... I was just using the same to be lazy and assumed in context it'd be fine)

and you can redistribute via

where you can rearrange for .
OHHhhhh ok so you would do

165000J
------------- to find the mass at the specific heat capacity
3500 x 21.5

165000
---------------- to find the mass at the Specific latent heat
255000

and then subtract them from each other?
0
1 year ago
#8
(Original post by Scarlett.sully)
OHHhhhh ok so you would do

165000J
------------- to find the mass at the specific heat capacity
3500 x 21.5

165000
---------------- to find the mass at the Specific latent heat
255000

and then subtract them from each other?
There isn't any mass loss...

(Original post by Callicious)
Mmm... take both the equations I gave, i.e.

and

for cooling/fusing respectively. Their sum (as mentioned) is the total heat transferred from the substance

I might have been a bit inexact with how I labelled my EQ's for you ( is different for fusing/cooling, equation-wise... I was just using the same to be lazy and assumed in context it'd be fine)

and you can redistribute via

where you can rearrange for .
The first is an expression of the heat transferred from the mixture when cooling/heating it. The second is an expression for the heat transferred from the mixture when it freezes/melts. Their sum is the third expression, which is the quantity you've been given, 165,000J.

Here...

You need to rearrange the last equation.
Last edited by Callicious; 1 year ago
0
#9
(Original post by Callicious)
There isn't any mass loss...

The first is an expression of the heat transferred from the mixture when cooling/heating it. The second is an expression for the heat transferred from the mixture when it freezes/melts. Their sum is the third expression, which is the quantity you've been given, 165,000J.

Here...

You need to rearrange the last equation.
mmm ok so if i rearanged this i would get 3500 x 21.5 =75250

and then adding on 255000 = 330250

would you then divide by the energy transferred?
0
1 year ago
#10
(Original post by Scarlett.sully)
mmm ok so if i rearanged this i would get 3500 x 21.5 =75250

and then adding on 255000 = 330250

would you then divide by the energy transferred?
Other way round, divide energy transferred by that quantity. If you rearrange that equation I gave you, you'd get

Ideally you'd address the final step with one big sum dumped into your calculator, which avoids dealing with numbers along the way
0
#11
(Original post by Callicious)
Other way round, divide energy transferred by that quantity. If you rearrange that equation I gave you, you'd get

Ideally you'd address the final step with one big sum dumped into your calculator, which avoids dealing with numbers along the way
i get iiittt so the final calculation is 165000
------------- = 0.5 kg
330250
I put it into the calculation and it works! i wanna thank you so much for you patience, this has helped me so much haha
2
1 year ago
#12
Is the change in energy not -21.5 rather than 21.5, If I'm wrong please explain as I'm a little confused
0
1 year ago
#13
(Original post by kemblespotter)
Is the change in energy not -21.5 rather than 21.5, If I'm wrong please explain as I'm a little confused
yes the change in energy is -21.5 because you have to do (-1.5) - 20 to get the change in temp.
0
1 year ago
#14
(Original post by Uwais Latona)
yes the change in energy is -21.5 because you have to do (-1.5) - 20 to get the change in temp.
That’s what I thought, was just wondering as OP used 21.5 and got a different value to what I calculated.
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Year 12s - where are you at with making decisions about university?

I’ve chosen my course and my university (26)
28.26%
I’ve chosen my course and shortlisted some universities (31)
33.7%
I’ve chosen my course, but not any universities (8)
8.7%
I’ve chosen my university, but not my course (3)
3.26%
I’ve shortlisted some universities, but not my course (5)
5.43%
I’m starting to consider my university options (13)
14.13%
I haven’t started thinking about university yet (4)
4.35%
I’m not planning on going to university (2)
2.17%