# SUVAT

Watch
Announcements
#1
Am I wrong to try to use v^2=u^2+2as for this, with u and a being perp to the slope instead of parallel, and therefore v is 0?
Last edited by user342; 1 month ago
0
1 month ago
#2
If you use v^2 = u^2 +2as perpendicular to the slope, you can find the maximum height, but you really need to relate this to the parallel to the slope distance. Time to peak would be a more natural/direct way of doing this rather than peak height? This is what the model solution seems to do.

So its not incorrect to use it, but its a less direct way and generally you choose your suvat equation to directly relate the variables of interest, rather than for solving for ones you dont really need.
Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago
0
#3
(Original post by mqb2766)
If you use v^2 = u^2 +2as perpendicular to the slope, you can find the maximum height, but you really need to relate this to the parallel to the slope distance. Time to peak would be a more natural/direct way of doing this rather than peak height? This is what the model solution seems to do.

So its not incorrect to use it, but its a less direct way and generally you choose your suvat equation to directly relate the variables of interest, rather than for solving for ones you dont really need.
Ok, thank you 😊
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Who is winning Euro 2020

France (118)
27.13%
England (155)
35.63%
Belgium (33)
7.59%
Germany (42)
9.66%
Spain (10)
2.3%
Italy (37)
8.51%
Netherlands (14)
3.22%
Other (Tell us who) (26)
5.98%