# variable acceleration

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

I am attaching a question and the book answer. I'm fine up to part d but then I'm not. It says sinkt is always 1 but I don't think it is. When t = 3pi it's -1. Am i missing something subtle?

And then they differentiate a to find max a. I did to and I get t/2 = 0, pi, 2pi and I subbed these into a = 4cos(t/2) and got 4 and -4 so I said it's 4. But why have they taken the route that they have.

I'm missing something but what?

And then they differentiate a to find max a. I did to and I get t/2 = 0, pi, 2pi and I subbed these into a = 4cos(t/2) and got 4 and -4 so I said it's 4. But why have they taken the route that they have.

I'm missing something but what?

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

I am attaching a question and the book answer. I'm fine up to part d but then I'm not. It says sinkt is always 1 but I don't think it is. When t = 3pi it's -1. Am i missing something subtle?

And then they differentiate a to find max a. I did to and I get t/2 = 0, pi, 2pi and I subbed these into a = 4cos(t/2) and got 4 and -4 so I said it's 4. But why have they taken the route that they have.

I'm missing something but what?

**maggiehodgson**)I am attaching a question and the book answer. I'm fine up to part d but then I'm not. It says sinkt is always 1 but I don't think it is. When t = 3pi it's -1. Am i missing something subtle?

And then they differentiate a to find max a. I did to and I get t/2 = 0, pi, 2pi and I subbed these into a = 4cos(t/2) and got 4 and -4 so I said it's 4. But why have they taken the route that they have.

I'm missing something but what?

However it seems to ask for maximum velocity and acceleration, so when sin() and cos()=1. Minumum would be sin() and cos() =-1.

Last edited by mqb2766; 4 weeks ago

0

reply

(Original post by

Any chance you could upload larger images? Theyre very blurred.

However it seems to ask for maximum acceleration, so when sin()=1. Minumum would be sin()=-1.

**mqb2766**)Any chance you could upload larger images? Theyre very blurred.

However it seems to ask for maximum acceleration, so when sin()=1. Minumum would be sin()=-1.

a) find the value of k (0.5) done that

b) find in term of Pi the values of t in the interval 0<=t<=4Pi (Pi, 3pi) done that

c) show that 4a^2 = 64 - (v-2)^2

d) find the maximum velocity and the maximum acceleration. At this point, although I got the same answers as in the book I did not understand some of their workings

Here's the book answer

At maximum velocity, a = 0 ms^−2 (agreed)

From part b, this occurs when t = π s and t = 3π s. (agreed)

In both cases,

**sin1kt=1**, so v = 2 + 8 = 10. (disagree sin (3pi/2 does not = 1)

The maximum value of a occurs when da/dat=0

(at this point I differentiated and found t/2 = 0 t 0, pi and 2pi

I then subbed it in to a = 4cos(t/2) and found max acc = 10)

But this is what the book did and I don't know why they dis it that way.

Since a is a multiple of coskt, da/dt is a multiple of sinkt,

so da/dt=0 when sinkt=0 and hence v = 2 + 0 = 2 (from a)

By the result from c, at v=2 we have (why do this and not sub into a = 4cos(t/2)?)

4a^2 = 64(-(2-2)^2

a = 4

The maximum values of velocity and acceleration are 10 ms−1 and 4 ms−2 respectively.

Thanks. Sorry for the rubbish photos. I don't know how to get them to be bigger or clearer.

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

In summary: v=2+8sinkt, k is a constant, initial acceleration is 4m/s/s/

a) find the value of k (0.5) done that

b) find in term of Pi the values of t in the interval 0<=t<=4Pi (Pi, 3pi) done that

c) show that 4a^2 = 64 - (v-2)^2

d) find the maximum velocity and the maximum acceleration. At this point, although I got the same answers as in the book I did not understand some of their workings

Here's the book answer

At maximum velocity, a = 0 ms^−2 (agreed)

From part b, this occurs when t = π s and t = 3π s. (agreed)

In both cases,

The maximum value of a occurs when da/dat=0

(at this point I differentiated and found t/2 = 0 t 0, pi and 2pi

I then subbed it in to a = 4cos(t/2) and found max acc = 10)

But this is what the book did and I don't know why they dis it that way.

Since a is a multiple of coskt, da/dt is a multiple of sinkt,

so da/dt=0 when sinkt=0 and hence v = 2 + 0 = 2 (from a)

By the result from c, at v=2 we have (why do this and not sub into a = 4cos(t/2)?)

4a^2 = 64(-(2-2)^2

a = 4

The maximum values of velocity and acceleration are 10 ms−1 and 4 ms−2 respectively.

Thanks. Sorry for the rubbish photos. I don't know how to get them to be bigger or clearer.

**maggiehodgson**)In summary: v=2+8sinkt, k is a constant, initial acceleration is 4m/s/s/

a) find the value of k (0.5) done that

b) find in term of Pi the values of t in the interval 0<=t<=4Pi (Pi, 3pi) done that

c) show that 4a^2 = 64 - (v-2)^2

d) find the maximum velocity and the maximum acceleration. At this point, although I got the same answers as in the book I did not understand some of their workings

Here's the book answer

At maximum velocity, a = 0 ms^−2 (agreed)

From part b, this occurs when t = π s and t = 3π s. (agreed)

In both cases,

**sin1kt=1**, so v = 2 + 8 = 10. (disagree sin (3pi/2 does not = 1)The maximum value of a occurs when da/dat=0

(at this point I differentiated and found t/2 = 0 t 0, pi and 2pi

I then subbed it in to a = 4cos(t/2) and found max acc = 10)

But this is what the book did and I don't know why they dis it that way.

Since a is a multiple of coskt, da/dt is a multiple of sinkt,

so da/dt=0 when sinkt=0 and hence v = 2 + 0 = 2 (from a)

By the result from c, at v=2 we have (why do this and not sub into a = 4cos(t/2)?)

4a^2 = 64(-(2-2)^2

a = 4

The maximum values of velocity and acceleration are 10 ms−1 and 4 ms−2 respectively.

Thanks. Sorry for the rubbish photos. I don't know how to get them to be bigger or clearer.

Tbh, simply noting the acceleration is 8k*cos(), where k=0.5 gives the max acceleration in 1 line? Similarly for the velocity sin is max at 1, so 2+8=10.

Last edited by mqb2766; 4 weeks ago

0

reply

(Original post by

By the sounds of it, they've found the statationary points of acceleration, so da/dt=0. That includes both max and min. Obviously you're just interested in the max points. Is that the confusion?

Tbh, simply noting the acceleration is 8k*cos(), where k=0.5 gives the max acceleration in 1 line? Similarly for the velocity sin is max at 1, so 2+8=10.

**mqb2766**)By the sounds of it, they've found the statationary points of acceleration, so da/dt=0. That includes both max and min. Obviously you're just interested in the max points. Is that the confusion?

Tbh, simply noting the acceleration is 8k*cos(), where k=0.5 gives the max acceleration in 1 line? Similarly for the velocity sin is max at 1, so 2+8=10.

Yes, the easiest way for me to get to grips with it was to sub into the acc equation rather than using the answer to part c. I just wondered if there had been a special reason for them doing it their way. Obviously not. Thanks for clarifying. I really doubt myself when I see odd ways of doing it.

Thanks again

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

May be. But the book does imply that sin(3pi/2) =1. That's just wrong isn't it.

Yes, the easiest way for me to get to grips with it was to sub into the acc equation rather than using the answer to part c. I just wondered if there had been a special reason for them doing it their way. Obviously not. Thanks for clarifying. I really doubt myself when I see odd ways of doing it.

Thanks again

**maggiehodgson**)May be. But the book does imply that sin(3pi/2) =1. That's just wrong isn't it.

Yes, the easiest way for me to get to grips with it was to sub into the acc equation rather than using the answer to part c. I just wondered if there had been a special reason for them doing it their way. Obviously not. Thanks for clarifying. I really doubt myself when I see odd ways of doing it.

Thanks again

If you wanted ot use c) max acceleration is when (v-2)^2 is minimized (0) so a=4. Again, not hard.

Last edited by mqb2766; 4 weeks ago

0

reply

(Original post by

Its hard to really comment on the solution without seeing it properly and the chapter its located in (tbh Im not sure I want to). Having said that, maximsing 2+8sin() or 4cos() is a trivial thing they expect you to do by inspection (at a-level) without using calculus. Their method is tedious for this question. sin(3pi/2) is obviously -1, so its a minimum (stationary point) rather than a maximum. Its a wonder they didn't differentiate again to evaluate the sign ....

If you wanted ot use c) max acceleration is when (v-2)^2 is minimized (0) so a=4. Again, not hard.

**mqb2766**)Its hard to really comment on the solution without seeing it properly and the chapter its located in (tbh Im not sure I want to). Having said that, maximsing 2+8sin() or 4cos() is a trivial thing they expect you to do by inspection (at a-level) without using calculus. Their method is tedious for this question. sin(3pi/2) is obviously -1, so its a minimum (stationary point) rather than a maximum. Its a wonder they didn't differentiate again to evaluate the sign ....

If you wanted ot use c) max acceleration is when (v-2)^2 is minimized (0) so a=4. Again, not hard.

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

You might have the book. It's Pearson's Statistics and Mechanics Year 2 Exercise 8C q 9.

**maggiehodgson**)You might have the book. It's Pearson's Statistics and Mechanics Year 2 Exercise 8C q 9.

Tbh, the answer reads like it was written by someone gong though the motions ... max ... have to differentiate ... rather than thinking about the question.

0

reply

Report

#9

**maggiehodgson**)

May be. But the book does imply that sin(3pi/2) =1. That's just wrong isn't it.

Yes, the easiest way for me to get to grips with it was to sub into the acc equation rather than using the answer to part c. I just wondered if there had been a special reason for them doing it their way. Obviously not. Thanks for clarifying. I really doubt myself when I see odd ways of doing it.

Thanks again

0

reply

Report

#11

(Original post by

For info:

**ghostwalker**)For info:

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

How can you expect students to understand proofs when the people making the solutions can't get the direction of implication right? {Sigh}

**DFranklin**)How can you expect students to understand proofs when the people making the solutions can't get the direction of implication right? {Sigh}

Oh dear, that is appalling.

Last edited by ghostwalker; 4 weeks ago

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top