Are skoliosexual people cisphobia?Watch
Just a thought that is worthy of a debate. Are skoliosexual people cisphobic if they won't consider dating a cisgender person?
^this is a real conversation. God I hate liberalism.
My own thinking would be that we don't choose what we find attractive, it being a purely subconscious process, so it's difficult to use it to make assumptions about a person's consciously held ideologies or worldview, unless we can demonstrate that phobic attitudes are a necessary condition for not finding certain things attractive.
A straight person usually wouldn't be thought of as homophobic for not finding people of the same gender attractive, but are thought of as homophobic if they carry certain attitudes or a certain worldview.
It seems to me that claiming a person who doesn't find X attractive must hold Y conscious attitudes or worldview is implicitly making an extra step in the middle by reasoning that:
- not only can conscious phobic attitudes cause a lack of attraction towards the focus of the phobia (or some similar direct causal relationship), but that
- no other factors are at play, such that no other interpretations are available for a person who doesn't find X attractive except that they hold Y phobic attitude.
If that's true then it's true, but what happened to the stereotype of a homophobic person being gay all along? Was that not a thing after all? Or are we expected to accept things as true because they're part of a political narrative?
Perhaps a more important question: Given there are probably 3 "skoliosexuals" in the entire world, who cares?
The left are basically moving to further balkanise sexuality beyond LGBTQIXNOP people into just different fetishishes/ preference. Furries will be the next big civil rights grift issue for progressives whilst Amazon takes over the world.