# Further Maths A Level Help Conics

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

Sort of struggling with the q link I've attached. So for part a I found S and S dash to be (2 root 5 , 0) , (- 2 root 5, 0).

For the second part I then said P = 4 root 5 + distance from P to S + distance from P to S dash but it does not seem to give a constant valiue.

I'm a bit lost and any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you ever so much!

For the second part I then said P = 4 root 5 + distance from P to S + distance from P to S dash but it does not seem to give a constant valiue.

I'm a bit lost and any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you ever so much!

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

Below is the screenshot of the question. Thank you once again!!

**maya_jai_singh**)Below is the screenshot of the question. Thank you once again!!

https://www.mathwarehouse.com/ellips...0co%2Dvetex%20.

What did you try to get the two lengths of interest? Why do you not get a constant value for their sum? Sketching the ellipse with a point on the perimeter and the two lines should suggest how to approach the problem?

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

(Original post by

You realize that the construction of an ellipse is based on this property

https://www.mathwarehouse.com/ellips...0co%2Dvetex%20.

What did you try to get the two lengths of interest? Why do you not get a constant value for their sum? Sketching the ellipse with a point on the perimeter and the two lines should suggest how to approach the problem?

**mqb2766**)You realize that the construction of an ellipse is based on this property

https://www.mathwarehouse.com/ellips...0co%2Dvetex%20.

What did you try to get the two lengths of interest? Why do you not get a constant value for their sum? Sketching the ellipse with a point on the perimeter and the two lines should suggest how to approach the problem?

0

reply

Report

#5

(Original post by

Hi, thanks for your quick response. I've sent an attachment of the work I've done.

**maya_jai_singh**)Hi, thanks for your quick response. I've sent an attachment of the work I've done.

0

reply

(Original post by

From your ellipse sketch, how is line 1 obtained?

**mqb2766**)From your ellipse sketch, how is line 1 obtained?

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

Below is the sketch of my cuve. When you say line 1, I am not too sure which line you are referring to. Once again thanks for your help.

**maya_jai_singh**)Below is the sketch of my cuve. When you say line 1, I am not too sure which line you are referring to. Once again thanks for your help.

Your sketch doesn't really have the x,y for P marked on it? That may help? Also drawing P "approximately vertically" above a focus may mean that you assume things about P which are not true in general. The sketch isn't wrong, but I don't see it being that useful the way it is.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

(Original post by

How do you get line 1 in your working.

Your sketch doesn't really have the x,y for P marked on it? That may help? Also drawing P "approximately vertically" above a focus may mean that you assume things about P which are not true in general. The sketch isn't wrong, but I don't see it being that useful the way it is.

**mqb2766**)How do you get line 1 in your working.

Your sketch doesn't really have the x,y for P marked on it? That may help? Also drawing P "approximately vertically" above a focus may mean that you assume things about P which are not true in general. The sketch isn't wrong, but I don't see it being that useful the way it is.

0

reply

Report

#9

(Original post by

So line 1 I basically said the perimeter is side SS dash add the other two sides. Side SS dash has length 4 root 5 and the other two sides lengths I found using Pythagoras. Hope that makes sense. I basically tried to add the length of all 3 sides but to no avail. Sorry about this.

**maya_jai_singh**)So line 1 I basically said the perimeter is side SS dash add the other two sides. Side SS dash has length 4 root 5 and the other two sides lengths I found using Pythagoras. Hope that makes sense. I basically tried to add the length of all 3 sides but to no avail. Sorry about this.

The distance between the focii is trivial.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

(Original post by

Ill try for the last time, how did you find the other two side lengths using Pythagoras - how do you get line 1? Its sort of the right approach but you're not sketching or providing any working for how you calculated those values. An obvious thing to say is your line 1 "must" be wrong in that your lengths are ~x^2. x^2 is length squared, so you're not adding lengths. A sketch should make that clear.

The distance between the focii is trivial.

**mqb2766**)Ill try for the last time, how did you find the other two side lengths using Pythagoras - how do you get line 1? Its sort of the right approach but you're not sketching or providing any working for how you calculated those values. An obvious thing to say is your line 1 "must" be wrong in that your lengths are ~x^2. x^2 is length squared, so you're not adding lengths. A sketch should make that clear.

The distance between the focii is trivial.

Thanks once again for your help but if belows sketch doesn't help, then please don't worry. I'm quite slow when it comes to maths so I'm probably just missing something key. Thank you once again for trying to deal with me

0

reply

Report

#11

(Original post by

So below is the sketch to try to explain what I did using Pythagoras.

Thanks once again for your help but if belows sketch doesn't help, then please don't worry. I'm quite slow when it comes to maths so I'm probably just missing something key. Thank you once again for trying to deal with me

**maya_jai_singh**)So below is the sketch to try to explain what I did using Pythagoras.

Thanks once again for your help but if belows sketch doesn't help, then please don't worry. I'm quite slow when it comes to maths so I'm probably just missing something key. Thank you once again for trying to deal with me

In your line 1 you are adding c^2, not c. So you need to take the square root of each of the two lengths squared, then add, then simplify to show the perimeter is constant.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

(Original post by

Your sketch still doesn't make clear what pythagoras triangles (and their lengths) you're using to find the two lengths of interest for this problem. But Im not going to ask again.

In your line 1 you are adding c^2, not c. So you need to take the square root of each of the two lengths squared, then add, then simplify to show the perimeter is constant.

**mqb2766**)Your sketch still doesn't make clear what pythagoras triangles (and their lengths) you're using to find the two lengths of interest for this problem. But Im not going to ask again.

In your line 1 you are adding c^2, not c. So you need to take the square root of each of the two lengths squared, then add, then simplify to show the perimeter is constant.

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top