The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
congrats!

I'm still waiting to here from them! when did you apply / when did you find out you have an interview? I applied oct 1st and no word!

I've heard they ask really weird questions to throw you off guard. example:
"Would you employ a pregnant woman?"

commercial awareness stuff as well I suppose
Reply 2
Is it bad of me that I very nearly didn't apply to Travers Smith because of the bloody awful grad recruitment website? I detest having to go on that site to see those red dots and endless loading animations... eugh. Still, the app is nearly finished! I'm gonna leave it a couple of hours, re-read and submit. Here's hoping...
Reply 3
not bad of you at all.

there are some firms i very nearly didn't apply to - or in fact didn't apply to - because of difficult to navigate websites.
Reply 4
cxg687
Hey everyone,

I have an interview at Travers Smith for their Christmas vac scheme next week. Has anyone here any experience of what the interview itself will actually be like - and any specific memories of questions asked or areas I should research?

Thanks for any help!
Be prepared for some curveballs. It's not really your standard City firm interview. The first half will be all of the rubbish about your CV, your motivations for law, why Travers, etc. Then out of the blue they'll probably ask you something strange. I got asked "if you could introduce any Bill to Parliament, what would it be?" Then based on my answers they asked a series of more complex morality-based questions which, although I'm sure they'd deny it, are designed to try and trip you up. Then I got asked some professional ethics questions including a scenario.

I've heard people who got asked about what they'd speak about at Speakers' Corner, whether it's ever okay to lie, etc. Stuff that's not really related to law. I just had a quick look on RollOnFriday (which, incidentally is very useful for interview questions, just go to the Training Contracts discussion board and use the 'Search' function) and some more questions are:

"Do you feel guilty for having bought your education?"
"Do you agree with positive discrimination?"
"Do you think you should have to employ a pregnant woman?"

EDIT: Sorry, that makes it sound a bit scary. I actually found it to be a pretty nice interview. They gave lots of opportunities for me to talk about what I wanted to, so you can direct the discussion, to an extent.
Reply 5
ssk2
Is it bad of me that I very nearly didn't apply to Travers Smith because of the bloody awful grad recruitment website? I detest having to go on that site to see those red dots and endless loading animations... eugh. Still, the app is nearly finished! I'm gonna leave it a couple of hours, re-read and submit. Here's hoping...
silence
there are some firms i very nearly didn't apply to - or in fact didn't apply to - because of difficult to navigate websites.
Man up! The both of you! :p: :p:
I got asked similar questions to TommehR (what law would you introduce, do you think its OK to lie) but I didn't feel like the firm was attempting to trip me up. Like most interviews, the most important thing is to be confident and charismatic yet give thoughtful and practical answers.
Reply 7
TommehR
Man up! The both of you! :p: :p:


But we don't wanna! :p:

Just submitted... Hopefully I'll never have to look at that stupid website again. Even the press release section annoyed me no end.

Ps. Nice people at TS, if you're reading this, PICK ME! I'm lovely :yep:
Reply 8
TommehR
Be prepared for some curveballs. It's not really your standard City firm interview. The first half will be all of the rubbish about your CV, your motivations for law, why Travers, etc. Then out of the blue they'll probably ask you something strange. I got asked "if you could introduce any Bill to Parliament, what would it be?" Then based on my answers they asked a series of more complex morality-based questions which, although I'm sure they'd deny it, are designed to try and trip you up. Then I got asked some professional ethics questions including a scenario.

I've heard people who got asked about what they'd speak about at Speakers' Corner, whether it's ever okay to lie, etc. Stuff that's not really related to law. I just had a quick look on RollOnFriday (which, incidentally is very useful for interview questions, just go to the Training Contracts discussion board and use the 'Search' function) and some more questions are:

"Do you feel guilty for having bought your education?"
"Do you agree with positive discrimination?"
"Do you think you should have to employ a pregnant woman?"

EDIT: Sorry, that makes it sound a bit scary. I actually found it to be a pretty nice interview. They gave lots of opportunities for me to talk about what I wanted to, so you can direct the discussion, to an extent.



Thanks for that, had the interview yesterday and it was exactly like you said! Really want to know the outcome now, how long did it take them to get back to you?
Reply 9
and thanks to everyone else for your advice too!
Reply 10
cxg687, how long did it take for Travers to get back to you after you initially applied?
Reply 11
cxg687
Thanks for that, had the interview yesterday and it was exactly like you said! Really want to know the outcome now, how long did it take them to get back to you?
I'm pretty sure everybody gets a letter around three days after their interview, whether it's a rejection or an offer.

ssk2
cxg687, how long did it take for Travers to get back to you after you initially applied?
If it's any help, last year I got invited to interview around two weeks after submitting the application.
Reply 12
ssk2
cxg687, how long did it take for Travers to get back to you after you initially applied?


I applied on the 2nd of October, and got invited to the interview on the 13th.
Reply 13
I should also add that they're not particularly good at getting back to those people that they don't want to make offers to. I have some friends who applied in Winter '07 who still haven't heard back from them. :p:
Reply 14
In which case, the 31st is 'D-Day' for me...
Reply 15
ssk2
In which case, the 31st is 'D-Day' for me...
Haha, I know you're being silly but I really don't think there are any hard and fast rules! I'm sure that some people hear earlier than two weeks while others have to wait quite a lot longer. :biggrin:
Hi guys,
I was wondering if anyone could offer me any insight into how my VS interview might have gone as I feel a little nervous about it!

Basically I got asked the "if you could introduce any bill" question which, despite a lot of contradictory arguments from the interviewer, I think I managed to answer and stick to my guns fairly well. However, as far as I am aware he didn't really ask me any moral/ethics questions and the interview lasted for about 20 mins of the half hour allotted. The girl in the next door room had 50 mins and I don't know if it is a good or a bad sign that mine was short! I was friendly, relaxed and confident but am nervous about the fact that he appeared to have made his mind up so quickly! Has anyone else had a similar experience?

Thanks in advance for any replies!
Caroline.
Reply 17
carolinepennington
Hi guys,
I was wondering if anyone could offer me any insight into how my VS interview might have gone as I feel a little nervous about it!

Basically I got asked the "if you could introduce any bill" question which, despite a lot of contradictory arguments from the interviewer, I think I managed to answer and stick to my guns fairly well. However, as far as I am aware he didn't really ask me any moral/ethics questions and the interview lasted for about 20 mins of the half hour allotted. The girl in the next door room had 50 mins and I don't know if it is a good or a bad sign that mine was short! I was friendly, relaxed and confident but am nervous about the fact that he appeared to have made his mind up so quickly! Has anyone else had a similar experience?

Thanks in advance for any replies!
Caroline.
Noone can possibly give you any indication of how you did. There are all sorts of reasons why an interview might be shorter or longer than what is scheduled. Plus it probably depends on which interviewer you got. Partners are generally busy people and don't always ask everything that Grad Recruitment says that they are supposed to.
"Noone can possibly give you any indication of how you did. There are all sorts of reasons why an interview might be shorter or longer than what is scheduled. Plus it probably depends on which interviewer you got. Partners are generally busy people and don't always ask everything that Grad Recruitment says that they are supposed to."

Ok well thanks for the help, someone told me they kick people they don't like out and keep the good ones talking which was not great to hear afterwards!
Reply 19
Hmmm, well if you had an interview which was shorter than average then it generally suggests one of two things. Either a) in the 20 minutes they decided they definitely wanted you and therefore no need to continue, or b) you definitely weren't what they were looking for and therefore a waste of time to continue. On the other hand, having a 50 minute interview when it's only meant to be half an hour suggests the girl you met was borderline and they were trying to make up their mind. I would imagine you won't be left waiting too long to find out at least. Either that or they just really wanted to get to lunch!