Ok, as Ickle_katie said, we have to decide who would be a suitable candidate that isn't vienna or howard.
Why can't it be Vienna or Howard?
I wish A would come online and explain there reasons for his mod choice and hopefully this would negate the need for yet another stupid discussion about something which should be relatively unproblematic to decide if handled properly.
Why can't they be chosen thats the point. I don't see why this should be such an issue. I thought that when A sent out the password changes before and he didnt do a sticky first and it caused an outcry that he said he would be more informative in future.
Yet again this hasn't been the case. Surely theres no point messing about deciding on mods when its all down to him anyway. THis whole thing seems to be a completely futile exercise and i can't wait to here what he has to say about it all.
I will put forward Jonathon for the position or possible weejimmie (even though he has not been around for as along as some others, he takes place in many debates and knows what he is talking about)
I think if A is in agreement that maybe the best policy rather than it being a popularity contest is for this forum to come up with 4 or so names of D&D mods that they would be happy with and A can pick one from that list, hopefully that would mean that everyone will be happy. Having another poll seems pretty pointless to me.
Right the plan is listen to what A has to say when he comes online and then if he is in agreement submit a list of approved members.
What criteria do we need for these then - I presume active debator in D&D would be a start.
I'm not entirely confident, but I don't think A will appear until monday at the earliest as it is the weekend, i'm sure he will comment on his return.
This is a pretty stupid situation. Maybe it'd be best to lose the D+D submod altogether, it seems to be fine apart from when deliberate troublemakers come, and then you don't need to read the whole thing anyway.