Back
to top
Dative Covalent Bonding in BCl3?
Watch this thread
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
DoubleJazzy
Badges:
4
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Recently I answered an exam style question which asked me to draw a dot and cross diagram for BCl3, showing outer electrons only.
The actual answer showed a boron atom in the centre, with 3 covalent bond electron pairs surrounding it from each chlorine atom.
Following the octet rule, I drew an extra two electrons from one of the chlorine atoms to signify a dative covalent bond, however this seems to be incorrect.
Why is it incorrect, and in what situation would I use dative covalent bonding?
James
The actual answer showed a boron atom in the centre, with 3 covalent bond electron pairs surrounding it from each chlorine atom.
Following the octet rule, I drew an extra two electrons from one of the chlorine atoms to signify a dative covalent bond, however this seems to be incorrect.
Why is it incorrect, and in what situation would I use dative covalent bonding?
James
0
reply
Dylan8421
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
Dative covalent bonding is when both electrons in the covalent bond come from the same atom.
As boron has 3 electrons in its outer shell it can form 3 covalent bonds with each chlorine where each atom donates 1 electron to the bond so each chlorine can gain a full outer shell.
As boron has 3 electrons in its outer shell it can form 3 covalent bonds with each chlorine where each atom donates 1 electron to the bond so each chlorine can gain a full outer shell.
Last edited by Dylan8421; 9 months ago
0
reply
DoubleJazzy
Badges:
4
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
(Original post by Dylan8421)
Dative covalent bonding is when both electrons in the covalent bond come from the same atom.
As boron has 3 electrons in its outer shell it can form 3 covalent bonds with each chlorine where each atom donates 1 electron to the bond so each chlorine can gain a full outer shell.
Dative covalent bonding is when both electrons in the covalent bond come from the same atom.
As boron has 3 electrons in its outer shell it can form 3 covalent bonds with each chlorine where each atom donates 1 electron to the bond so each chlorine can gain a full outer shell.
But why doesn't one of the chlorine atoms share 2 of its own electrons via a dative covalent bond so that boron has a full outer shell (since 6+2=8)?
0
reply
scimus63
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
BCl3 does not have an octet of electrons, it only has 6e in the valence shell, look here
https://www.science-revision.co.uk/A...ctet_rule.html
https://www.science-revision.co.uk/A...ctet_rule.html
0
reply
5hyl33n
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
(Original post by DoubleJazzy)
Recently I answered an exam style question which asked me to draw a dot and cross diagram for BCl3, showing outer electrons only.
The actual answer showed a boron atom in the centre, with 3 covalent bond electron pairs surrounding it from each chlorine atom.
Following the octet rule, I drew an extra two electrons from one of the chlorine atoms to signify a dative covalent bond, however this seems to be incorrect.
Why is it incorrect, and in what situation would I use dative covalent bonding?
James
Recently I answered an exam style question which asked me to draw a dot and cross diagram for BCl3, showing outer electrons only.
The actual answer showed a boron atom in the centre, with 3 covalent bond electron pairs surrounding it from each chlorine atom.
Following the octet rule, I drew an extra two electrons from one of the chlorine atoms to signify a dative covalent bond, however this seems to be incorrect.
Why is it incorrect, and in what situation would I use dative covalent bonding?
James
Write out the number of outer electrons of BCl3
Step 2
Boron has 3 electrons in its outer shell.
Cl has 7 electrons in its outer shell.
Step 3
Therefore, to get a full outer shell, each chlorine needs to gain one electron and the boron needs to lose all three electrons. Therefore, each chlorine will take one electron from the boron.
Spoiler: ![Name: BCl3.png
Views: 284
Size: 14.8 KB]()
Show
0
reply
charco
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by DoubleJazzy)
I understand that each chlorine atom has a full shell through covalent bonding, but by boron forming 3 covalent bonds it would only have 6 electrons in its outer shell (3 from its original outer shell and 1 from each chlorine atom, so an extra 3).
But why doesn't one of the chlorine atoms share 2 of its own electrons via a dative covalent bond so that boron has a full outer shell (since 6+2=8)?
I understand that each chlorine atom has a full shell through covalent bonding, but by boron forming 3 covalent bonds it would only have 6 electrons in its outer shell (3 from its original outer shell and 1 from each chlorine atom, so an extra 3).
But why doesn't one of the chlorine atoms share 2 of its own electrons via a dative covalent bond so that boron has a full outer shell (since 6+2=8)?
The electron deficient structure only occurs in the gaseous state, while the solid boron trichloride has tetrahedral boron atoms with full octets in a polymeric structure.
Why can it not form a dative coordinate bond with a chlorine lone pair?
The answer is because it is energetically unfavourable to do so ... but why is that the case?
I can only imagine that is has something to do with the electropositive nature of the boron atom (electronegativity 2.04) not being attractive enough for the electron pair compared to the electronegative chlorine atom (electronegativity 3.16) .
Boron also has no available 'd' orbitals to make the process easier. It does have an available 'p' orbital but, that is apparently not good enough in the gaseous state.
1
reply
DoubleJazzy
Badges:
4
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
(Original post by charco)
Good question (and studiously ignored by the subsequent posters).
The electron deficient structure only occurs in the gaseous state, while the solid boron trichloride has tetrahedral boron atoms with full octets in a polymeric structure.
Why can it not form a dative coordinate bond with a chlorine lone pair?
The answer is because it is energetically unfavourable to do so ... but why is that the case?
I can only imagine that is has something to do with the electropositive nature of the boron atom (electronegativity 2.04) not being attractive enough for the electron pair compared to the electronegative chlorine atom (electronegativity 3.16) .
Boron also has no available 'd' orbitals to make the process easier. It does have an available 'p' orbital but, that is apparently not good enough in the gaseous state.
Good question (and studiously ignored by the subsequent posters).
The electron deficient structure only occurs in the gaseous state, while the solid boron trichloride has tetrahedral boron atoms with full octets in a polymeric structure.
Why can it not form a dative coordinate bond with a chlorine lone pair?
The answer is because it is energetically unfavourable to do so ... but why is that the case?
I can only imagine that is has something to do with the electropositive nature of the boron atom (electronegativity 2.04) not being attractive enough for the electron pair compared to the electronegative chlorine atom (electronegativity 3.16) .
Boron also has no available 'd' orbitals to make the process easier. It does have an available 'p' orbital but, that is apparently not good enough in the gaseous state.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
