Archive SPTM/0002/REC/HPOO Watch

This discussion is closed.
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3941
Report 13 years ago
#3941
(Original post by Musafir_85)
kumble and harbhajan bowled 37.1 and 30 overs, gave away 98 and 94 runs and just took 3 and 2 wickets between them.

where as Afridi who is not the primary bowler took 3 wickets for 80 runs. howzat

What an absolutely ludicrous argument.
By your logic: "Harbhajan scored 27 runs, taufeeq umar (your opener) scored 18. Harbhajan isn't even a batsman. Howzat"

Even though we all know harbhajan is (probably) not as good as umar.


In any case, Kumble and Harbhajan were far more economical than afridi.

Kumble : 3 wickets, 37.1 overs, 98 runs conceded (RR: 2.64)
Harbhajan's RR was 3.1


afridi: 3 wickets, 21.0 overs, 80 runs (RR: 3.81)
0
Musafir_85
Badges: 0
#3942
Report 13 years ago
#3942
(Original post by Hash)
What an absolutely ludicrous argument.
By your logic: "Harbhajan scored 27 runs, taufeeq umar (your opener) scored 18. Harbhajan isn't even a batsman. Howzat"

Even though we all know harbhajan is (probably) not as good as umar.


In any case, Kumble and Harbhajan were far more economical than afridi.

Kumble : 3 wickets, 37.1 overs, 98 runs conceded (RR: 2.64)
Harbhajan's RR was 3.1


afridi: 3 wickets, 21.0 overs, 80 runs (RR: 3.81)

so in this case as you have made a comparisan you agree that afridi and kumble and harbhajan are at an equal level.
let me remind you afridi is not a primary bowler where as other two are indias main bowling enforcers.
0
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3943
Report 13 years ago
#3943
(Original post by pete77)
I did not say talent is the reason that teams lose you said that.
Let me refresh your memory:

(Original post by pete77)
...Aussies, Indians, SA, NZ are not weak in this area. They lose when they lack the talent not the case for Pak they have talent but cannot harness it !
See, you did say it after all :rolleyes:

(Original post by pete77)
Dont misquote me. Pak are off form so they deserve to be beaten clinically ! But they are not that tells me that the Indian side are much overrated.
Maybe it tells you that India aren't on form at the moment either.
0
Musafir_85
Badges: 0
#3944
Report 13 years ago
#3944
taufeeq umar (your opener)

although he is not famous like tendulkar but we all know tuafeeq umer is an opener.
0
topdude
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3945
Report 13 years ago
#3945
(Original post by Musafir_85)
so in this case as you have made a comparisan you agree that afridi and kumble and harbhajan are at an equal level.
let me remind you afridi is not a primary bowler where as other two are indias main bowling enforcers.
no u paki, just becuase he made a comparison dont mean he thinks they r of an equal level, just like he made a comparison of the batting quality of bhaju and umar
0
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3946
Report 13 years ago
#3946
(Original post by Musafir_85)
so in this case as you have made a comparisan you agree that afridi and kumble and harbhajan are at an equal level.
let me remind you afridi is not a primary bowler where as other two are indias main bowling enforcers.
No, I'm pointing out that your comparison is stupid.

You cannot take a singular bowling performance and cite it as the determining factor of a bowler's quality.
0
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3947
Report 13 years ago
#3947
(Original post by Musafir_85)
although he is not famous like tendulkar but we all know tuafeeq umer is an opener.
"We all" don't. I have several Pakistani friends, who follow cricket, hadn't even known much about him.
0
Musafir_85
Badges: 0
#3948
Report 13 years ago
#3948
you tell me wats more important in test cricket: run rate or wickets.

wat i was trying to see was that it took kumble 37.1 overs to take 3 wickets. and harbhajan took 30 overs. afridi took just 21 overs to bowl to pick up 3 wkts.
0
Musafir_85
Badges: 0
#3949
Report 13 years ago
#3949
no u paki
why do you end up with this when u cant put up a logical argument.
0
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3950
Report 13 years ago
#3950
(Original post by Musafir_85)
you tell me wats more important in test cricket: run rate or wickets.

wat i was trying to see was that it took kumble 37.1 overs to take 3 wickets. and harbhajan took 30 overs. afridi took just 21 overs to bowl to pick up 3 wkts.
There were long periods of time when we brought our spinners on with a defensive field, to stem the run rate, and put pressure on the batsmen.
0
topdude
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3951
Report 13 years ago
#3951
(Original post by Musafir_85)
you tell me wats more important in test cricket: run rate or wickets.

wat i was trying to see was that it took kumble 37.1 overs to take 3 wickets. and harbhajan took 30 overs. afridi took just 21 overs to bowl to pick up 3 wkts.
so what? he's bowled well, dont mean he is as good as kumble!
0
Vishpatel
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3952
Report 13 years ago
#3952
(Original post by Hash)
Danish over Kumble/Harbhajan? Are you drunk?

yea i think so mate!!! must be scandalous comments like that!!
0
topdude
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3953
Report 13 years ago
#3953
(Original post by Musafir_85)
why do you end up with this when u cant put up a logical argument.
i actually put a logical argument after writing "no u paki", u paki
0
Musafir_85
Badges: 0
#3954
Report 13 years ago
#3954
(Original post by topdude)
i actually put a logical argument after writing "no u paki", u paki

right this shows how narrowminded, disrespectfull, cheap and low standard you can be.
0
Hash
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3955
Report 13 years ago
#3955
(Original post by Musafir_85)
right this shows how narrowminded, disrespectfull, cheap and low standard you can be.
I must agree here.
0
john williams
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3956
Report 13 years ago
#3956
Pete77 is blatantly a Pakistan fan in disguise. If you'd actually watched any of todays play, you'd have seen what good bowlers Kumble and Harbajan are and why not compare their career figures and then you'll get the true picture. Plus Harbajan unsettles the batsman who then go out to the fast bowlers which has what has happened alot in the past, as well as himself getting wickets.
0
john williams
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#3957
Report 13 years ago
#3957
(Original post by Musafir_85)
right this shows how narrowminded, disrespectfull, cheap and low standard you can be.
I don’t think he meant it in a racist way and was just referring to your supporting team, so stop dramatising it.
0
chandni
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3958
Report 13 years ago
#3958
Pakistani fans dear o dear it's ok to say your team played absoloute *******s today and were very lucky with getting the tendulkar wicket and that would be the end of but u start making strange comparissons coz thats what ur comparissons are to a fan of the game for life simply strange.
0
pete77
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3959
Report 13 years ago
#3959
Ok Kids
Not to worry i c you are enjoying yourself over nothing really !
0
pete77
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3960
Report 13 years ago
#3960
You all know that my comments are accurate and realistic as do my backers !
So whether or not you can accept the truth is none of my concern !
0
X
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Brexit: Given the chance now, would you vote leave or remain?

Remain (1129)
79.01%
Leave (300)
20.99%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise