The man who mistook his wife for a hat

Watch
Rosie0404563
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#1
Heya, I am so close to being finished with my personal statement, I have read a few books, one of them being the man who mistook his wife for a hat. I am not sure whether to put it in my personal statement, this is because I have read many personal statements where this book is mentioned. Do I include it or do I leave it out, because I'm thinking that its quite basic and the admission people would have already read people's opinions on this book multiple times. If anyone could offer me advice I would be really grateful.

Thanks, Rosie
0
reply
ecolier
Badges: 22
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report 1 month ago
#2
(Original post by Rosie0404563)
Heya, I am so close to being finished with my personal statement, I have read a few books, one of them being the man who mistook his wife for a hat. I am not sure whether to put it in my personal statement, this is because I have read many personal statements where this book is mentioned. Do I include it or do I leave it out, because I'm thinking that its quite basic and the admission people would have already read people's opinions on this book multiple times. If anyone could offer me advice I would be really grateful.

Thanks, Rosie
What course is this for?

Amazing book, btw. I would also recommend reading Phantoms in the Brain.
0
reply
Rosie0404563
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report Thread starter 1 month ago
#3
(Original post by ecolier)
What course is this for?

Amazing book, btw. I would also recommend reading Phantoms in the Brain.
this is for psychology
0
reply
ecolier
Badges: 22
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report 1 month ago
#4
(Original post by Rosie0404563)
this is for psychology
I would write it but also write how it made you chose Psychology - if you wrote that it has to be unique.
0
reply
Interrobang
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report 1 month ago
#5
It is a common one to mention, so if you have other ones to talk about then they would likely be better. I agree it's a fascinating book though
0
reply
PinkMobilePhone
Badges: 22
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report 1 month ago
#6
I was drawn into this thread just from the title.

Did a guy really mistake his wife for a hat?
1
reply
Interrobang
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report 1 month ago
#7
(Original post by PinkMobilePhone)
I was drawn into this thread just from the title.

Did a guy really mistake his wife for a hat?
Essentially, yes. I read the book a while ago and found this summary:

We can see a clear example of a neurological deficit in the case of Dr. P, who experienced strange problems with visual recognition. He was unable to recognize the faces of his students and was known to pat inanimate objects like parking meters and fire hydrants, thinking they were children. He even struggled to identify his own wife—whose head he often grabbed at, believing it was a hat. Dr. P was suffering from agnosia—an inability to recognize and interpret visual data.

Sacks found that Dr. P could only recognize pictures of family and friends in which the subjects had distinct features—he identified a photo of his brother Paul, for example, by noting Paul’s square jaw and big teeth. He could identify only the features and use them as a clue to guess the identity of the person, but he was not truly recognizing them.


Despite this, Dr. P’s mind seemed to compensate for this deficit by crediting his neurological “account” in other ways. He had exceptional powers of abstract description and excelled at schematic mental models involving abstract shapes—for example, he was a skillful player of blind chess, able to perfectly visualize the board and pieces in his mind. His intact abstract sensibility gave him some means of interpreting what he saw with his eyes, providing him with a tool to order, recognize, and make sense of his world.
Last edited by Interrobang; 1 month ago
1
reply
PinkMobilePhone
Badges: 22
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report 1 month ago
#8
(Original post by Interrobang)
Essentially, yes. I read the book a while ago and found this summary:

We can see a clear example of a neurological deficit in the case of Dr. P, who experienced strange problems with visual recognition. He was unable to recognize the faces of his students and was known to pat inanimate objects like parking meters and fire hydrants, thinking they were children. He even struggled to identify his own wife—whose head he often grabbed at, believing it was a hat. Dr. P was suffering from agnosia—an inability to recognize and interpret visual data.

Sacks found that Dr. P could only recognize pictures of family and friends in which the subjects had distinct features—he identified a photo of his brother Paul, for example, by noting Paul’s square jaw and big teeth. He could identify only the features and use them as a clue to guess the identity of the person, but he was not truly recognizing them.


Despite this, Dr. P’s mind seemed to compensate for this deficit by crediting his neurological “account” in other ways. He had exceptional powers of abstract description and excelled at schematic mental models involving abstract shapes—for example, he was a skillful player of blind chess, able to perfectly visualize the board and pieces in his mind. His intact abstract sensibility gave him some means of interpreting what he saw with his eyes, providing him with a tool to order, recognize, and make sense of his world.
Gosh!
1
reply
Rosie0404563
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report Thread starter 2 weeks ago
#9
I applied and didn't include this book, I got offers from all 5 Universities that I applied to. yay
1
reply
ecolier
Badges: 22
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report 2 weeks ago
#10
(Original post by Rosie0404563)
I applied and didn't include this book, I got offers from all 5 Universities that I applied to. yay
Well done, have you had a chance to read Phantoms in the Brain?
0
reply
KA_P
Badges: 19
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report 2 weeks ago
#11
(Original post by Interrobang)
Essentially, yes. I read the book a while ago and found this summary:

We can see a clear example of a neurological deficit in the case of Dr. P, who experienced strange problems with visual recognition. He was unable to recognize the faces of his students and was known to pat inanimate objects like parking meters and fire hydrants, thinking they were children. He even struggled to identify his own wife—whose head he often grabbed at, believing it was a hat. Dr. P was suffering from agnosia—an inability to recognize and interpret visual data.

Sacks found that Dr. P could only recognize pictures of family and friends in which the subjects had distinct features—he identified a photo of his brother Paul, for example, by noting Paul’s square jaw and big teeth. He could identify only the features and use them as a clue to guess the identity of the person, but he was not truly recognizing them.


Despite this, Dr. P’s mind seemed to compensate for this deficit by crediting his neurological “account” in other ways. He had exceptional powers of abstract description and excelled at schematic mental models involving abstract shapes—for example, he was a skillful player of blind chess, able to perfectly visualize the board and pieces in his mind. His intact abstract sensibility gave him some means of interpreting what he saw with his eyes, providing him with a tool to order, recognize, and make sense of his world.
That seems to be an intriguing read :0
This one's going onto my list of books to read
0
reply
KA_P
Badges: 19
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report 2 weeks ago
#12
(Original post by Rosie0404563)
I applied and didn't include this book, I got offers from all 5 Universities that I applied to. yay
Congratulations!!! 🥳🥳
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

When did you submit your Ucas application if you applied to go to university this year?

September 2021 (12)
6.06%
October 2021 (97)
48.99%
November 2021 (20)
10.1%
December 2021 (29)
14.65%
January 2021 (16)
8.08%
I still haven't submitted it yet! (19)
9.6%
Something else (5)
2.53%

Watched Threads

View All