# Vectors and proof 3points are a straight line

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

KingRich

Badges:
14

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1

Hi, this is a 3 part question. I believe I’m right in my working out, however could someone verify my working out as I believe my QM is incorrect.

Above is the question.

Here is my solution.

Above is the question.

Here is my solution.

Last edited by KingRich; 1 month ago

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2

Report

#2

Looking good. (How) Did you find the value of t in the end?

Minor things which might help in the end, I'd always express stuff like

()a + ()b

so the coefficients of a and b can be easily seen, even if they're negative.

Minor things which might help in the end, I'd always express stuff like

()a + ()b

so the coefficients of a and b can be easily seen, even if they're negative.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

KingRich

Badges:
14

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3

(Original post by

Looking good. (How) Did you find the value of t in the end?

Minor things which might help in the end, I'd always express stuff like

()a + ()b

so the coefficients of a and b can be easily seen, even if they're negative.

**mqb2766**)Looking good. (How) Did you find the value of t in the end?

Minor things which might help in the end, I'd always express stuff like

()a + ()b

so the coefficients of a and b can be easily seen, even if they're negative.

I was having a little trouble finding the t, so the confirmation helps me to re-evaluate my approach.

Noted: the a and b

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4

Report

#4

(Original post by

Thank you for confirming.

I was having a little trouble finding the t, so the confirmation helps me to re-evaluate my approach.

Noted: the a and b

**KingRich**)Thank you for confirming.

I was having a little trouble finding the t, so the confirmation helps me to re-evaluate my approach.

Noted: the a and b

Edit -

As an alternative way to do it, you could express a point on BM in terms of a parameter s, then find where (value of t (and s)) the two lines meet.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

KingRich

Badges:
14

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5

(Original post by

Draw the line connecting the 3 points on and draw the two corresponding triangles in terms of *a, *b and the lines youve found. Is there anything "similar" between the two (three) triangles?

Edit -

As an alternative way to do it, you could express a point on BM in terms of a parameter s, then find where (value of t (and s)) the two lines meet.

**mqb2766**)Draw the line connecting the 3 points on and draw the two corresponding triangles in terms of *a, *b and the lines youve found. Is there anything "similar" between the two (three) triangles?

Edit -

As an alternative way to do it, you could express a point on BM in terms of a parameter s, then find where (value of t (and s)) the two lines meet.

Between BQ and QM The only thing I see in common is a (t-1), however one is for a and the other is for b.

I think this is what you meant, although like usual I could be wrong

Edit: BP= positive a

Last edited by KingRich; 1 month ago

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6

Report

#6

There are two ways to go about this

1) is to construct similar triangles and find the t value for which they are actually similar.

2) to find the intersection point between OP and BM which gives Q and t.

For the first method, you can construct 3 "triangles" involving BQ, QM or BM, then argue that the a:b ratio must be the same for each. The "triangle" for BM is formed starting at B then moving -b/2 and then a. So the side ratio of the coefficients a:b is 1:-1/2. You should be able to do the same for one or both of BQ and QM and the a:b side ratios will involve t. Then for the lines to be in the same direction, all would have the same ratio which means you can solve for t.

It would be worth drawing each triangle with one side being parallel to a, the other parallel to b and the third is one of the sides listed above to make sure you understand it

1) is to construct similar triangles and find the t value for which they are actually similar.

2) to find the intersection point between OP and BM which gives Q and t.

For the first method, you can construct 3 "triangles" involving BQ, QM or BM, then argue that the a:b ratio must be the same for each. The "triangle" for BM is formed starting at B then moving -b/2 and then a. So the side ratio of the coefficients a:b is 1:-1/2. You should be able to do the same for one or both of BQ and QM and the a:b side ratios will involve t. Then for the lines to be in the same direction, all would have the same ratio which means you can solve for t.

It would be worth drawing each triangle with one side being parallel to a, the other parallel to b and the third is one of the sides listed above to make sure you understand it

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

Badges:
14

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7

(Original post by

There are two ways to go about this

1) is to construct similar triangles and find the t value for which they are actually similar.

2) to find the intersection point between OP and BM which gives Q and t.

For the first method, you can construct 3 "triangles" involving BQ, QM or BM, then argue that the a:b ratio must be the same for each. The "triangle" for BM is formed starting at B then moving -b/2 and then a. So the side ratio of the coefficients a:b is 1:-1/2. You should be able to do the same for one or both of BQ and QM and the a:b side ratios will involve t. Then for the lines to be in the same direction, all would have the same ratio which means you can solve for t.

It would be worth drawing each triangle with one side being parallel to a, the other parallel to b and the third is one of the sides listed above to make sure you understand it

**mqb2766**)There are two ways to go about this

1) is to construct similar triangles and find the t value for which they are actually similar.

2) to find the intersection point between OP and BM which gives Q and t.

For the first method, you can construct 3 "triangles" involving BQ, QM or BM, then argue that the a:b ratio must be the same for each. The "triangle" for BM is formed starting at B then moving -b/2 and then a. So the side ratio of the coefficients a:b is 1:-1/2. You should be able to do the same for one or both of BQ and QM and the a:b side ratios will involve t. Then for the lines to be in the same direction, all would have the same ratio which means you can solve for t.

It would be worth drawing each triangle with one side being parallel to a, the other parallel to b and the third is one of the sides listed above to make sure you understand it

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8

Report

#8

Looks correct, but a qucker way would have been to choose one of the "triangles" to be BM as it does not involve t, so its easier. Using that with your BQ

1/-0.5 = t/(t-1)

t-1 = -0.5t

1.5t = 1

t = 2/3

1/-0.5 = t/(t-1)

t-1 = -0.5t

1.5t = 1

t = 2/3

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

Badges:
14

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9

I didn’t really understand what you were trying to explain with the triangles.

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10

Report

#10

(Original post by

I didn’t really understand what you were trying to explain with the triangles.

**KingRich**)I didn’t really understand what you were trying to explain with the triangles.

x = 3i + 4j

would be 3 along the x-axis and 4 along the y-axis. The line OX would form a 35 right angled triangle with the other two sides 3i and 4j.

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11

Report

#11

This guy is always worth watching. The first four minutes pretty much cover everything (after that its not relevant) apart from they use v,w for the two (basis) vectors rather than a,b. Obvously you can use whatever names you want

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7RM...el=3Blue1Brown

The lines will be parallel if the multipliers (coefficients) associated with a and b are in the same ratio, just as two "normal" lines are parallel if they have the same gradient (same y:x ratio). The corresponding triangles are similar.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7RM...el=3Blue1Brown

The lines will be parallel if the multipliers (coefficients) associated with a and b are in the same ratio, just as two "normal" lines are parallel if they have the same gradient (same y:x ratio). The corresponding triangles are similar.

Last edited by mqb2766; 1 month ago

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top