Hey guys, I solved for the initial velocity which is 24.01m/s. However, when calculating for the final velocity, do you take displacement as -2.48m. Furthermore, when calculating the final velocity why is it that you use the same initial velocity when the particle is moving downwards since acceleration is now 9.8m/s^2 not -9.8. Thanks for your help

(edited 2 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Nithu05

Hey guys, I solved for the initial velocity which is 24.01m/s. However, when calculating for the final velocity, do you take displacement as -2.48m. Furthermore, when calculating the final velocity why is it that you use the same initial velocity when the particle is moving downwards since acceleration is now 9.8m/s^2 not -9.8. Thanks for your help

Yes. If upwards is positive (velocity) then the floor is a downwards displacement of -2.48.

If upwards is positive, the downards acceleration is always -9.8 throughout the flight.

When the ball returns to the initial point, the velocity is the same as the iniital, but negative as the trajectory is a quadratic, symmetric about the highest point.

A sketch with the positive direction clearly marked on usually helps.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Yes. If upwards is positive (velocity) then the floor is a downwards displacement of -2.48.

If upwards is positive, the downards acceleration is always -9.8 throughout the flight.

When the ball returns to the initial point, the velocity is the same as the iniital, but negative as the trajectory is a quadratic, symmetric about the highest point.

If upwards is positive, the downards acceleration is always -9.8 throughout the flight.

When the ball returns to the initial point, the velocity is the same as the iniital, but negative as the trajectory is a quadratic, symmetric about the highest point.

Ok so the initial velocity is -24.01m/s when calculating the final velocity? I'm quite sure the mark scheme is wrong. Could you please confirm? Thanks

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by Nithu05

Ok so the initial velocity is -24.01m/s when calculating the final velocity?

The velocity of the particle when it returns to the initial position is -24.01. It is moving downwards, hence the importance of defining the positive direction clearly and using it consistently.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by mqb2766

The velocity of the particle when it returns to the initial position is -24.01. It is moving downwards, hence the importance of defining the positive direction clearly and using it consistently.

Ok thank you so much for your help Could you take a look at the mark scheme I attached in my previous comment please. Thanks

Original post by Nithu05

Ok thank you so much for your help Could you take a look at the mark scheme I attached in my previous comment please. Thanks

Yes, what are you unsure about?

They flip the positive direction in the second half of the calculation.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Yes, what are you unsure about?

I'm pretty sure it's wrong since it uses displacement as 2.48 m instead of -2.48m

Original post by Nithu05

I'm pretty sure it's wrong since it uses displacement as 2.48 m instead of -2.48m

Why not do it your way and see if you can work out what they've done / if its correct? What are the signsl of the terms in

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

... does it change the calculation of v?

Original post by mqb2766

Why not do it your way and see if you can work out what they've done / if its correct? What are the signsl of the terms in

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

... does it change the calculation of v?

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

... does it change the calculation of v?

Yes it does since I'm getting v= 23.49842761 m/s whereas they are getting 25..m/s. I think they may have made an error since their initial velocity and displacement values are both positive when they should be negative

Although the initial velocity value wouldn't make much of a difference when you plug it into the equation.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by Nithu05

Yes it does since I'm getting v= 23.49842761 m/s whereas they are getting 25..m/s. I think they may have made an error since their initial velocity and displacement values are both positive when they should be negative

Firstly, if a ball falls a further 2m, the speed must increase. So 23.5 isnt correct.

Write down each of the variables properly and with reference to the positive direction (upwards), like they have in the model solution on the left hand side.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Firstly, if a ball falls a further 2m, the speed must increase. So 23.5 isnt correct.

Write down each of the variables properly and with reference to the positive direction (upwards), like they have in the model solution on the left hand side.

Write down each of the variables properly and with reference to the positive direction (upwards), like they have in the model solution on the left hand side.

Yes you are correct but I don't know where I went wrong. Could you please check my values?

S=-2.48m U=-24.01m/s V=? A=9.8m/s^2 T=?

Original post by Nithu05

Yes you are correct but I don't know where I went wrong. Could you please check my values?

S=-2.48m U=-24.01m/s V=? A=9.8m/s^2 T=?

S=-2.48m U=-24.01m/s V=? A=9.8m/s^2 T=?

Oh no. I see where I went wrong. I didn't multiply it by 2 in the v^2=u^2+2as equation

Original post by Nithu05

Yes you are correct but I don't know where I went wrong. Could you please check my values?

S=-2.48m U=-24.01m/s V=? A=9.8m/s^2 T=?

S=-2.48m U=-24.01m/s V=? A=9.8m/s^2 T=?

Which direction does gravity (acceleration) act and what is its sign? Why is this important in the suvat equation? How does it therefore match with the model solution?

Hint A positive acceleration gives a "u" quadratic which will accelerate out into space.

Original post by Nithu05

Oh no. I see where I went wrong. I didn't multiply it by 2 in the v^2=u^2+2as equation

A small error but not the most important. See the previous post.

Original post by mqb2766

Which direction does gravity (acceleration) act and what is its sign? Why is this important in the suvat equation? How does it therefore match with the model solution?

Hint A positive acceleration gives a "u" quadratic which will accelerate out into space.

Hint A positive acceleration gives a "u" quadratic which will accelerate out into space.

Gravity normally acts in the downwards direction and is positive. In this case, the particle is moving downwards with an initial velocity of -24.01m/s so shouldn't acceleration be 9.8m/s^2?

Original post by Nithu05

Gravity normally acts in the downwards direction and is positive. In this case, the particle is moving downwards with an initial velocity of -24.01m/s so shouldn't acceleration be 9.8m/s^2?

No. The sign of the acceleration depends on the direction you define as positive, just like displacement and velocity. If you define upwards as positive, a=-9.8. If you define downwards as positive, a=9.8. In this case its the former. In the mark scheme, they flip the positive direction in the second part of the calculation, hence its the latter.

(edited 2 years ago)

Original post by mqb2766

No. The sign of the acceleration depends on the direction you define as positive, just like displacement and velocity. If you define upwards as positive, a=-9.8. If you define downwards as positive, a=9.8. In this case its the former. In the mark scheme, they flip the positive direction in the second part of the calculation, hence its the latter.

I'm slightly confused as to what you mean by 'flip the positive direction'. My initial velocity is negative but isn't the ball travelling downwards so Im confused as to how g is -9.8. Sorry if I am taking up your time

Original post by Nithu05

Hey guys, I solved for the initial velocity which is 24.01m/s. However, when calculating for the final velocity, do you take displacement as -2.48m. Furthermore, when calculating the final velocity why is it that you use the same initial velocity when the particle is moving downwards since acceleration is now 9.8m/s^2 not -9.8. Thanks for your help

Just use conservation of energy: height above the ground is 2.48+2.45*24.01/2. Then use v=sqrt(2gh)

Original post by Dscasg

Just use conservation of energy: height above the ground is 2.48+2.45*24.01/2. Then use v=sqrt(2gh)

Sorry I don't do physics. I'm currently doing mechanics

Original post by Nithu05

I'm slightly confused as to what you mean by 'flip the positive direction'. My initial velocity is negative but isn't the ball travelling downwards so Im confused as to how g is -9.8. Sorry if I am taking up your time

Its worth you working through the calculation properly first (hope you have) and use mark schemes like this only after you are fairly sure about stuff. Otherwise its easy to miss assumptions... like this which maybe they're not clear about.

Firstly, the directlon you assume is positive does not change the calculation or motion. But you have to use it consistently as it determines the signs of the displacement, velocity and acceleration.

If upwards is positive, then the initial velocity is positive (t=0) and the final velocity when it hits the floor is negative. The floor displacement is negative -2.5 and the acceleration is -9.8 because the acceleration acts downards.

In the 2nd half of the model solution, they change positive to act in the downards direction. Soi the initial velocity is -24 (t=0) and when it returns to the initial positon its 24, the displacement is 2.5 and the acceleration is 9.8. They do this just simply to flip all the negative terms to be positive and hopefullly reduce errors with reasoning about negative signs. However, it has to be done clearly.

Both give the same results as the

2as

multiplies two terms a and s, which have the same sign (for this question part). Either both positive or both negative, depending on which direction is positive. However, it does not matter as their product is positive so the speed increases as it falls the further distance to the floor. As mentioned earlier, a clear sketch with the positive direction and the terms marked on helps.

(edited 2 years ago)

- TSR Study Together - STEM vs Humanities!
- Further maths and maths A level help
- How should i be revising for maths?
- maths help
- Maths websites for gcse?
- How do I revise for maths?
- Maths GCSE HELPPPPPPP ASAPPP, PLEASEEEE
- Math GCSE revision tips?
- how to get a grade 9 in maths?
- help !!
- How To Get Grade 9 in Maths GCSE [My Guide]
- is this possible?
- GCSE prep in the summer
- Maths Help Plz
- How to get a 9 in gcse maths
- predict your gcse grades!! (2023-2024)
- How to get Grade 9 in maths
- Further maths
- Why have I become so bad at maths (a level - year 13)
- GCSE help

- Official Dental Hygiene and Therapy (Oral Health Science) 2024 Entry Thread
- Arup graduates schemes 2024
- Official London School of Economics and Political Science 2024 Applicant Thread
- Oxford MSc in Digital Scholarship 2024
- What is it actually like studying at uni?
- Which 2024 election will be most significant for the world?
- Amazon Cyber Security Apprenticeship 2024
- Accommodation
- Pupillage Application 2023-2024
- LSE september 2024 grad intake
- Official Veterinary Medicine Applicants thread 2024 entry
- Official Oxford 2024 Postgraduate Applicants Thread
- Phoenix Group Rotation Program
- Official MPhil Economics/Economic Research etc Cambridge 2024 Thread
- Vodafone Cyber Security Degree Apprenticeship 2024
- Official: University of St Andrews A100 2024 Entry
- How to enjoy uni when living at home?
- LNAT for King's college
- Bristol Maths Test for Engineering Courses
- Official: University of East Anglia (UEA) A100 2024 Entry

- Diagnostic Radiography Applicants 2024
- Janus Henderson Investors Associate Analyst Graduate Programme
- french a level
- Please help! Need advice
- Monarchists vs Republicans
- Official Thread: Graduate Entry Medicine 2024 Entry
- Aberystwyth Accommodation
- What is the most social accommodation at the Uni of Notts?
- HM Treasury or FCA Grad Scheme
- A level choices struggles
- Official Newcastle University Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entry
- Medicine ucat
- taking a levels I don't like?
- bad LNAT score...HELP
- Is it too late to start Uni at 21?
- The Official Psychology Applicants for 2024 Entry Thread
- Question about extra time arrangement (GCSE)
- Official: University of Sheffield A100 2024 entry
- I got A*AA for my A-Levels - ask me anything.
- Alex Navalny dies in Arctic Circle jail, says Russia

- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point
- hyperbolic function catenary problem

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023

- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point
- hyperbolic function catenary problem

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023