# Edexcel Year 2 Chapter 6 exercise 6E question 6C

Watch this threadPage 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

doozy123

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1

From what I can't understand why solutionbanks says that tan k stays the same when k changes to -pi/2

If you can prove why tan stays positive please can you explain

thanks in advanced

If you can prove why tan stays positive please can you explain

thanks in advanced

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2

Report

#2

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

doozy123

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3

(Original post by

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

**mqb2766**)In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4

Report

#4

(Original post by

taking that logic, you are saying that as k is between -pi/2 and 0 that x is negative - that is right. but for example cos 30 =cos-30 but tan 30!=tan-30

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

**doozy123**)taking that logic, you are saying that as k is between -pi/2 and 0 that x is negative - that is right. but for example cos 30 =cos-30 but tan 30!=tan-30

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

doozy123

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5

**mqb2766**)

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

(Original post by

The key thing is that the expressions for cos and tan, defined in terms of sin in the first quadrant, also apply in the fourth quadrant. You can write

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

**mqb2766**)The key thing is that the expressions for cos and tan, defined in terms of sin in the first quadrant, also apply in the fourth quadrant. You can write

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

0

reply

mqb2766

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6

Report

#6

(Original post by

taking that logic, you are saying that as k is between -pi/2 and 0 that x is negative - that is right. but for example cos 30 =cos-30 but tan 30!=tan-30

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

in essence that is the correct working for cos(k) and tan(k) when 0<k<pi/2. however tan(k) is, like you said, sin/cos but sin in the 4th quadrant is negative (only cos is positive in the 4th quadrant), cos is the same

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

**doozy123**)taking that logic, you are saying that as k is between -pi/2 and 0 that x is negative - that is right. but for example cos 30 =cos-30 but tan 30!=tan-30

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

in essence that is the correct working for cos(k) and tan(k) when 0<k<pi/2. however tan(k) is, like you said, sin/cos but sin in the 4th quadrant is negative (only cos is positive in the 4th quadrant), cos is the same

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

sin(k) = x

is valid here in both the 1st and 4th quadrants, so it can be -1 to 1. You seem to be insisting you write -x when its in the fourth quadrant and this is the only problem I can see with your attachment. The expressions

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = sqrt(1-x^2)

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = x/sqrt(1-x^2)

are valid in both the 1st and 4th quadrant and x = sin(k) so varies -1 .. 1.

The expressions are not valid in the other two quadrants as cos() becomes negative and you'd have to consider the negated root for it so

cos(k) = -sqrt(1-x^2)

and similar for tan().

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7

**mqb2766**)

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

**mqb2766**)

The key thing is that the expressions for cos and tan, defined in terms of sin in the first quadrant, also apply in the fourth quadrant. You can write

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

(Original post by

the

sin(k) = x

is valid here in both the 1st and 4th quadrants, so it can be -1 to 1. You seem to be insisting you write -x when its in the fourth quadrant and this is the only problem I can see with your attachment. The expressions

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = sqrt(1-x^2)

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = x/sqrt(1-x^2)

are valid in both the 1st and 4th quadrant and x = sin(k) so varies -1 .. 1.

The expressions are not valid in the other two quadrants as cos() becomes negative and you'd have to consider the negated root for it so

cos(k) = -sqrt(1-x^2)

and similar for tan().

**mqb2766**)the

sin(k) = x

is valid here in both the 1st and 4th quadrants, so it can be -1 to 1. You seem to be insisting you write -x when its in the fourth quadrant and this is the only problem I can see with your attachment. The expressions

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = sqrt(1-x^2)

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = x/sqrt(1-x^2)

are valid in both the 1st and 4th quadrant and x = sin(k) so varies -1 .. 1.

The expressions are not valid in the other two quadrants as cos() becomes negative and you'd have to consider the negated root for it so

cos(k) = -sqrt(1-x^2)

and similar for tan().

that is why i am saying sin(k)=-(x) as as k is within this interval it is negative whether you look at the graphs or cast diagrams, and like we've agreed cos(k) stays the same.

if that isnt prove enough, we are explicitly told the range of k -pi/2<k<0

when you look at the graphs of sin cos and tan

sin is negative between that domain

cos is positive for that domain

tan is negative for that domain

0

reply

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8

**mqb2766**)

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

**mqb2766**)

The key thing is that the expressions for cos and tan, defined in terms of sin in the first quadrant, also apply in the fourth quadrant. You can write

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

**mqb2766**)

the

sin(k) = x

is valid here in both the 1st and 4th quadrants, so it can be -1 to 1. You seem to be insisting you write -x when its in the fourth quadrant and this is the only problem I can see with your attachment. The expressions

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = sqrt(1-x^2)

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = x/sqrt(1-x^2)

are valid in both the 1st and 4th quadrant and x = sin(k) so varies -1 .. 1.

The expressions are not valid in the other two quadrants as cos() becomes negative and you'd have to consider the negated root for it so

cos(k) = -sqrt(1-x^2)

and similar for tan().

that is why i am saying sin(k)=-(x) as as k is within this interval it is negative whether you look at the graphs or cast diagrams, and like we've agreed cos(k) stays the same.

if that isnt proof enough, we are explicitly told the range of k -pi/2<k<0

when you look at the graphs of sin cos and tan

sin is negative between that domain

cos is positive for that domain

tan is negative for that domain

Last edited by doozy123; 3 months ago

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9

Report

#9

(Original post by

perhaps i am phrasing it wrong with -x. when the range of k is restricted to -pi/2<k<0 that means x has to be negative, therefore -1<x<0.

that is why i am saying

if that isnt prove enough, we are explicitly told the range of k -pi/2<k<0

when you look at the graphs of sin cos and tan

sin is negative between that domain

cos is positive for that domain

tan is negative for that domain

**doozy123**)perhaps i am phrasing it wrong with -x. when the range of k is restricted to -pi/2<k<0 that means x has to be negative, therefore -1<x<0.

that is why i am saying

**sin(k)=-(x)**as as k is within this interval it is negative whether you look at the graphs or cast diagrams, and like we've agreed cos(k) stays the same.if that isnt prove enough, we are explicitly told the range of k -pi/2<k<0

when you look at the graphs of sin cos and tan

sin is negative between that domain

cos is positive for that domain

tan is negative for that domain

sin(k) = x

not -x. Obviously the x in the previous line is negative in the fourth quadrant and positive in the first quadrant. I don't understand why you keep writing the negative sign in front of it. Obviously sin() is odd, so

sin(-k) = -sin(k)

but here we're taking a different k in quadrant, not expressing it terms of the original k which lay in quadrant 1.

To put numbers in, Id have something like k=-30 (fourth quadrant).

sin(k) = x = -1/2

cos(k) = sqrt(3)/2

tan(k) = -1/2 / sqrt(3)/2 = -1/sqrt(3)

Because x has a negative value, its all consistent in the fourth quadrant, just as if k=30 and therefore x=1/2.

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10

**mqb2766**)

In the 4th quadrant, tan would be negative. But as x is negative, the ans (expression for tan() in b) is the same.

also if you sub in -x into the expression in part b you get negative of that expression

**mqb2766**)

The key thing is that the expressions for cos and tan, defined in terms of sin in the first quadrant, also apply in the fourth quadrant. You can write

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k))

and its valid in both the first and fourth quadrant. Here, they have simply replaced sin() with x.

I think thats what youre saying in the attachment by considering -x? If the original x is positive (first quadrant), then -x would refer to the value of sin in the fourth quadrant and its all good.

so doesnt that mean that tan(k) is negative when -pi/2<k<0

thanks for your reply

**mqb2766**)

the

sin(k) = x

is valid here in both the 1st and 4th quadrants, so it can be -1 to 1. You seem to be insisting you write -x when its in the fourth quadrant and this is the only problem I can see with your attachment. The expressions

cos(k) = sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = sqrt(1-x^2)

tan(k) = sin(k)/sqrt(1-sin^2(k)) = x/sqrt(1-x^2)

are valid in both the 1st and 4th quadrant and x = sin(k) so varies -1 .. 1.

The expressions are not valid in the other two quadrants as cos() becomes negative and you'd have to consider the negated root for it so

cos(k) = -sqrt(1-x^2)

and similar for tan().

that is why i am saying sin(k)=-(x) as as k is within this interval it is negative whether you look at the graphs or cast diagrams, and like we've agreed cos(k) stays the same.

if that isnt prove enough, we are explicitly told the range of k -pi/2<k<0

when you look at the graphs of sin cos and tan

sin is negative between that domain

cos is positive for that domain

tan is negative for that domain

(Original post by

The only thing I disagree with is the bold and I think you should write

sin(k) = x

not -x. Obviously the x in the previous line is negative in the fourth quadrant and positive in the first quadrant. I don't understand why you keep writing the negative sign in front of it. Obviously sin() is odd, so

sin(-k) = -sin(k)

but here we're taking a different k in quadrant, not expressing it terms of the original k which lay in quadrant 1.

To put numbers in, Id have something like k=-30 (fourth quadrant).

sin(k) = x = -1/2

cos(k) = sqrt(3)/2

tan(k) = -1/2 / sqrt(3)/2 = -1/sqrt(3)

Because x has a negative value, its all consistent in the fourth quadrant, just as if k=30 and therefore x=1/2.

**mqb2766**)The only thing I disagree with is the bold and I think you should write

sin(k) = x

not -x. Obviously the x in the previous line is negative in the fourth quadrant and positive in the first quadrant. I don't understand why you keep writing the negative sign in front of it. Obviously sin() is odd, so

sin(-k) = -sin(k)

but here we're taking a different k in quadrant, not expressing it terms of the original k which lay in quadrant 1.

To put numbers in, Id have something like k=-30 (fourth quadrant).

sin(k) = x = -1/2

cos(k) = sqrt(3)/2

tan(k) = -1/2 / sqrt(3)/2 = -1/sqrt(3)

Because x has a negative value, its all consistent in the fourth quadrant, just as if k=30 and therefore x=1/2.

regardless of the -x/x using thoses examples you put, notice how tan is

**negative**and cos is positive which is what I am trying to say at the start of this thread.

when you use a negative value of k: sin is negative, cos +ve, tan -ve, - this is what we have now both established with your example of -30 so how can tan(k) stay the same

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11

Report

#11

(Original post by

ok I see where you are coming from with the -x. to be clear x is the same value but i am putting -x to indicate that it is as you are saying, x has a negative value since you know k=arcsinx. i guess you could say i am putting the negative infront of the x to treat x the value itself as positive with a negative infront to help with visualisation in terms of triangles and the graphs.

regardless of the -x/x using thoses examples you put, notice how tan is

when you use a negative value of k: sin is negative, cos +ve, tan -ve, - this is what we have now both established with your example of -30 so how can tan(k) stay the same

**doozy123**)ok I see where you are coming from with the -x. to be clear x is the same value but i am putting -x to indicate that it is as you are saying, x has a negative value since you know k=arcsinx. i guess you could say i am putting the negative infront of the x to treat x the value itself as positive with a negative infront to help with visualisation in terms of triangles and the graphs.

regardless of the -x/x using thoses examples you put, notice how tan is

**negative**and cos is positive which is what I am trying to say at the start of this thread.when you use a negative value of k: sin is negative, cos +ve, tan -ve, - this is what we have now both established with your example of -30 so how can tan(k) stay the same

There are only so many times I can say the same thing. If you disagree with the expressions in the model solution also applying in quadrant 4, create an example like in #9, work it through and post your working/confusion.

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

Badges:
2

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12

(Original post by

Noone has disagreed about tan being negative in quadrant 4. It is (and cos is positive in both quadrants). I noted as such in every reply. The only issue I had was your use of -x which changed the expression. The expression is the same in quadrants 1 and 4, as per the model solution, but the value of x obviously changes sign because sin changes sign in quadrants 1 and 4.

There are only so many times I can say the same thing. If you disagree with the expressions in the model solution also applying in quadrant 4, create an example like in #9, work it through and post your working/confusion.

**mqb2766**)Noone has disagreed about tan being negative in quadrant 4. It is (and cos is positive in both quadrants). I noted as such in every reply. The only issue I had was your use of -x which changed the expression. The expression is the same in quadrants 1 and 4, as per the model solution, but the value of x obviously changes sign because sin changes sign in quadrants 1 and 4.

There are only so many times I can say the same thing. If you disagree with the expressions in the model solution also applying in quadrant 4, create an example like in #9, work it through and post your working/confusion.

I’ve worked through an example and I see it now

X holds a negative value and when you use an a example tan(k) is still negative which is why it doesn’t change

Thanks for your help - took a bit of understanding of what you were trying to say about the -x

Cheers

0

reply

Badges:
19

Rep:

?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13

Report

#13

(Original post by

I’ve worked through an example and I see it now

X holds a negative value and when you use an a example tan(k) is still negative which is why it doesn’t change

Thanks for your help - took a bit of understanding of what you were trying to say about the -x

Cheers

**doozy123**)I’ve worked through an example and I see it now

X holds a negative value and when you use an a example tan(k) is still negative which is why it doesn’t change

Thanks for your help - took a bit of understanding of what you were trying to say about the -x

Cheers

sqrt(1 - 1/4) = sqrt(3)/2

not

sqrt(1 - (pi/6)^2)

.... Obviously the values are similar because sin(x) ~ x for small x, but ....

Last edited by mqb2766; 3 months ago

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top