WJEC AS MATHS unit 1
Watch this thread
gatheredjam6
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
WTF was that paper.
They put topics in it that we haven’t revised or were removed.
They put topics in it that we haven’t revised or were removed.
1
reply
rycbar.123
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
Literally, our teacher said exponential wouldn’t be in it, and there was that area of the line crossing the circle part which I have never seen in a textbook or revision guide. Also all the questions that are usually high tariff (trig) was so low, and then the simultaneous logs- what?! I’m just really annoyed because I did revise everything, yet a good 40 of the marks I couldn’t have revised for because I didn’t expect them to be in there
0
reply
rycbar.123
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
also I’ve gotten an A in every single mock/test, and now I’d be surprised to get a C
1
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by rycbar.123)
Literally, our teacher said exponential wouldn’t be in it, and there was that area of the line crossing the circle part which I have never seen in a textbook or revision guide. Also all the questions that are usually high tariff (trig) was so low, and then the simultaneous logs- what?! I’m just really annoyed because I did revise everything, yet a good 40 of the marks I couldn’t have revised for because I didn’t expect them to be in there
Literally, our teacher said exponential wouldn’t be in it, and there was that area of the line crossing the circle part which I have never seen in a textbook or revision guide. Also all the questions that are usually high tariff (trig) was so low, and then the simultaneous logs- what?! I’m just really annoyed because I did revise everything, yet a good 40 of the marks I couldn’t have revised for because I didn’t expect them to be in there
0
reply
hadrhyl
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
That was an absolutely ridiculous test. All the tests so far have seemed tougher than their previous years counterparts but that was a completely different game.
0
reply
Kyli3ee
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
hadrhyl
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report
#7
(Original post by Kyli3ee)
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
1
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report
#8
(Original post by Kyli3ee)
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
We should complain to WJEC - they said they’d remove exponential growth and they clearly didn’t so 7 marks that we can’t control
0
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report
#9
(Original post by alevels21)
Literally used the laws but never finished the question
We should complain to WJEC - they said they’d remove exponential growth and they clearly didn’t so 7 marks that we can’t control
Literally used the laws but never finished the question
We should complain to WJEC - they said they’d remove exponential growth and they clearly didn’t so 7 marks that we can’t control
2
reply
Sol'
Badges:
3
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report
#10
Honestly that paper was vile, it was absolutely nothing like the 2018 2019 or specification papers, wtf was that log question, not to mention the propotional and inverse proportion stuff. Even the questions didn't factorise readily. Plus all the topics you can usually pick up marks on were either worth way less or just weren't in the paper. I really feel like the wjec was taking the mick especially for our year group. I feel like they could've set a paper that was somewhat like the other 2 new spec ones (or even the sample assesment materials).
1
reply
megpar
Badges:
4
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report
#11
honestly i've never seen a worse paper, it was horrible. how are they gonna put in topics they said they weren't going to include? the logarithm question was disgusting, i was writing right up until the end.
1
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report
#12
(Original post by megpar)
honestly i've never seen a worse paper, it was horrible. how are they gonna put in topics they said they weren't going to include? the logarithm question was disgusting, i was writing right up until the end.
honestly i've never seen a worse paper, it was horrible. how are they gonna put in topics they said they weren't going to include? the logarithm question was disgusting, i was writing right up until the end.
0
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report
#13
(Original post by Sol')
Honestly that paper was vile, it was absolutely nothing like the 2018 2019 or specification papers, wtf was that log question, not to mention the propotional and inverse proportion stuff. Even the questions didn't factorise readily. Plus all the topics you can usually pick up marks on were either worth way less or just weren't in the paper. I really feel like the wjec was taking the mick especially for our year group. I feel like they could've set a paper that was somewhat like the other 2 new spec ones (or even the sample assesment materials).
Honestly that paper was vile, it was absolutely nothing like the 2018 2019 or specification papers, wtf was that log question, not to mention the propotional and inverse proportion stuff. Even the questions didn't factorise readily. Plus all the topics you can usually pick up marks on were either worth way less or just weren't in the paper. I really feel like the wjec was taking the mick especially for our year group. I feel like they could've set a paper that was somewhat like the other 2 new spec ones (or even the sample assesment materials).
0
reply
gatheredjam6
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#14
To be fair, it wasn’t just this test that was solid.
Every exam I had so far were so ridiculously hard compared to 2018 or 2019.
Every exam I had so far were so ridiculously hard compared to 2018 or 2019.
1
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#15
Report
#15
(Original post by gatheredjam6)
To be fair, it wasn’t just this test that was solid.
Every exam I had so far were so ridiculously hard compared to 2018 or 2019.
To be fair, it wasn’t just this test that was solid.
Every exam I had so far were so ridiculously hard compared to 2018 or 2019.
0
reply
gatheredjam6
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#16
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#17
Report
#17
(Original post by gatheredjam6)
Do you think I can resit next year if I get low marks for this?
Do you think I can resit next year if I get low marks for this?

0
reply
gatheredjam6
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#18
(Original post by Kyli3ee)
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
Does anyone know how to do the simultaneous logs
0
reply
zotrain123
Badges:
4
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#19
Report
#19
Well I sat the paper and I thought that it was bad and I spoke to head of maths and she said that they reported the paper and another school she knows had all their students crying and had to send an email to the parents about it and they have complained because half of the topics were taken out due to covid. I wonder what they are going to do?
0
reply
alevels21
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#20
Report
#20
(Original post by zotrain123)
Well I sat the paper and I thought that it was bad and I spoke to head of maths and she said that they reported the paper and another school she knows had all their students crying and had to send an email to the parents about it and they have complained because half of the topics were taken out due to covid. I wonder what they are going to do?
Well I sat the paper and I thought that it was bad and I spoke to head of maths and she said that they reported the paper and another school she knows had all their students crying and had to send an email to the parents about it and they have complained because half of the topics were taken out due to covid. I wonder what they are going to do?
Lord knows what they’ll do some people said they might sue which is a bit much but understandable I’m still so stressed and mortified from doing that paper!!



0
reply
X
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top