Not sure how to understand this, since the particle is undergoing damped shm isn't the acceleration in the opposite direction of it's displacement by a=-w^2x however in my diagram I took the acceleration to be positive

(edited 1 year ago)

Scroll to see replies

Original post by mqb2766

What is the calculation youre doing? In undamped, unforced shm, the acceleration is as you describe. Here there is both a damping and a forcing term, so what are you asking? Also if P is displaced from O, the positive displacement arrow should be reversed?

I'm doing ma= 12sin(t) -6v -7.5x

My apologies with the poor questioning, from what you just in a damped system the acceleration is no longer always opposite to displacement?

Is the way I thought about it correct, since it's accelerating forwards I just used the f=ma resultant force to create the second order differential?

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by Student 999

I'm doing ma= 12sin(t) -6v -7.5x

My apologies with the poor questioning, from what you just in a damped system the acceleration is no longer always opposite to displacement?

Is the way I thought about it correct, since it's accelerating forwards I just used the f=ma resultant force to create the second order differential?

My apologies with the poor questioning, from what you just in a damped system the acceleration is no longer always opposite to displacement?

Is the way I thought about it correct, since it's accelerating forwards I just used the f=ma resultant force to create the second order differential?

Firstly your right hand side contains three variables: time, displacement and velocity. Cant see how you can easily relate them together at this point? So temporarily forgetting about the forcing term 8sin(t), then the acceleration is a function of velocity and displacement. Its a negative function of displacement to this is undamped SHM. However, the acceleration is "reduced" by the velocity which is effectively the damping part. To understand it better, youd really have to plot the spiral evolution in displacement,velocity space, but intuitively, if P has positive displacement and is moving away from O, then the acceleration is more negative to return to O so the peak displacement will be less than undamped SHM. Similarly for the other sign quadrants.

Original post by mqb2766

Firstly your right hand side contains three variables: time, displacement and velocity. Cant see how you can easily relate them together at this point? So temporarily forgetting about the forcing term 8sin(t), then the acceleration is a function of velocity and displacement. Its a negative function of displacement to this is undamped SHM. However, the acceleration is "reduced" by the velocity which is effectively the damping part. To understand it better, youd really have to plot the spiral evolution in displacement,velocity space, but intuitively, if P has positive displacement and is moving away from O, then the acceleration is more negative to return to O so the peak displacement will be less than undamped SHM. Similarly for the other sign quadrants.

Aren't the three variables just forces. Why can't you relate them?

There's a driving force of 12sin(t)

A restoring force trying to bring the particle back to the origin of 7.5x and resistant force of 6v

using these will give you the resultant force?

isn't acceleration a function of velocity against time rather than displacement.

I'm struggling to follow with the rest of the explanation could you simplify it down a bit thanks a lot

Original post by Student 999

Aren't the three variables just forces. Why can't you relate them?

There's a driving force of 12sin(t)

A restoring force trying to bring the particle back to the origin of 7.5x and resistant force of 6v

using these will give you the resultant force?

isn't acceleration a function of velocity against time rather than displacement.

I'm struggling to follow with the rest of the explanation could you simplify it down a bit thanks a lot

There's a driving force of 12sin(t)

A restoring force trying to bring the particle back to the origin of 7.5x and resistant force of 6v

using these will give you the resultant force?

isn't acceleration a function of velocity against time rather than displacement.

I'm struggling to follow with the rest of the explanation could you simplify it down a bit thanks a lot

Yes you can relate them and form the ode as you say. Theyre forces and they sum to give the resultant and its just Newton 2.

That explanation is about as simple as you can go. There are three variables: time, displacement and velocity and these combine to give acceleration. Forget about the forcing term (time) then you just have

acceleration = - displacement - velocity

If you think about the displacement number line (so positive and negative regions), then think about the positive and negative directions of motion (velocity), you should be able to argue that the acceleration produces a more damped response. The usual displacement - time response looks like

https://beltoforion.de/en/harmonic_oscillator/

If you plot displacement against velocity, you get a spiral.

Original post by mqb2766

Yes you can relate them and form the ode as you say. Theyre forces and they sum to give the resultant and its just Newton 2.

That explanation is about as simple as you can go. There are three variables: time, displacement and velocity and these combine to give acceleration. Forget about the forcing term (time) then you just have

acceleration = - displacement - velocity

If you think about the displacement number line (so positive and negative regions), then think about the positive and negative directions of motion (velocity), you should be able to argue that the acceleration produces a more damped response. The usual displacement - time response looks like

https://beltoforion.de/en/harmonic_oscillator/

If you plot displacement against velocity, you get a spiral.

That explanation is about as simple as you can go. There are three variables: time, displacement and velocity and these combine to give acceleration. Forget about the forcing term (time) then you just have

acceleration = - displacement - velocity

If you think about the displacement number line (so positive and negative regions), then think about the positive and negative directions of motion (velocity), you should be able to argue that the acceleration produces a more damped response. The usual displacement - time response looks like

https://beltoforion.de/en/harmonic_oscillator/

If you plot displacement against velocity, you get a spiral.

Thanks for the article/website it did confirm what I was thinking

In this question using the same approach

The acceleration is positive going upwards

Tension is also positive since it's been stretched and want to return to equilibrium

Weight is a resistance force acting against the upwards motion

14v is negative also it resists the motion of returning to equilibrium

ma=T -14v -mg

why is this wrong?

Original post by Student 999

Thanks for the article/website it did confirm what I was thinking

In this question using the same approach

The acceleration is positive going upwards

Tension is also positive since it's been stretched and want to return to equilibrium

Weight is a resistance force acting against the upwards motion

14v is negative also it resists the motion of returning to equilibrium

ma=T -14v -mg

why is this wrong?

In this question using the same approach

The acceleration is positive going upwards

Tension is also positive since it's been stretched and want to return to equilibrium

Weight is a resistance force acting against the upwards motion

14v is negative also it resists the motion of returning to equilibrium

ma=T -14v -mg

why is this wrong?

Part a) should help. You know the vertical equilibrium length and it will be damped shm about that point. Then include the constant equilibrium length, which I guess is where the 14 on the right comes from. Note weight is not a resistance force acting against motion.

Original post by mqb2766

Part a) should help. You know the vertical equilibrium length and it will be damped shm about that point. Then include the constant equilibrium length, which I guess is where the 14 on the right comes from. Note weight is not a resistance force acting against motion.

Tension is just 24(x-0.35), why is weight not a resistance force against motion?

Original post by Student 999

Tension is just 24(x-0.35), why is weight not a resistance force against motion?

What do you think a resistance force against motion means? Why does it apply to weight/gravity?

Original post by mqb2766

What do you think a resistance force against motion means? Why does it apply to weight/gravity?

Something that requires work done which is directly involved in a system. Similar to a previous thread about circular motion about a point, weight acts as a force involved in the circular motion

Original post by Student 999

Something that requires work done which is directly involved in a system. Similar to a previous thread about circular motion about a point, weight acts as a force involved in the circular motion

Weight is a constant force. I cant see how it can be interpreted as anything to do with resistance against motion or circular motion.

Original post by mqb2766

Weight is a constant force. I cant see how it can be interpreted as anything to do with resistance against motion or circular motion.

I'm a bit confused, could you set up the equation and correct what parts I've interpreted wrong

Original post by Student 999

Not sure how to understand this, since the particle is undergoing damped shm isn't the acceleration in the opposite direction of it's displacement by a=-w^2x however in my diagram I took the acceleration to be positive

When you use calculus notation x is measured in the direction from 0 to P, not as you have drawn it as a 2 headed arrow. The acceleration is written d^2x/dt^2. This doesn't mean the particle is accelerating (getting faster) in the x direction because you are forgetting that this 2nd derivative can be a positive or negative number. If it is a positive number the particle is getting faster in x direction. If it is a negative number it means the particle is getting slower in the x direction.

The solution to (a) is correct with md^2x/dt^2 on the right hand side.

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by AlanT12

When you use calculus notation x is measured in the direction from 0 to P, not as you have drawn it as a 2 headed arrow. The acceleration is written d^2x/dt^2. This doesn't mean the particle is accelerating (getting faster) in the x direction because you are forgetting that this 2nd derivative can be a positive or negative number. If it is a positive number the particle is getting faster in x direction. If it is a negative number it means the particle is getting slower in the x direction.

The solution to (a) is correct with md^2x/dt^2 on the right hand side.

The solution to (a) is correct with md^2x/dt^2 on the right hand side.

I'm referring to the question I posted later about the container and spring?

My bad I thought you were mqb

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by Student 999

I'm referring to the question I posted later about the container and spring?

In that question x is in the downwards direction from the top of the spring. The acceleration of the ball is always md^2x/dt^2. Again this can be positive or negative, so you don't add an extra sign for it. So equation of motion is

Net force in x direction = md^2x/dt^2

or

-kx+mg-14V=md^2x/dt^2

Original post by AlanT12

In that question x is in the downwards direction from the top of the spring. The acceleration of the ball is always md^2x/dt^2. Again this can be positive or negative, so you don't add an extra sign for it. So equation of motion is

Net force in x direction = md^2x/dt^2

or

-kx+mg-14V=md^2x/dt^2

Net force in x direction = md^2x/dt^2

or

-kx+mg-14V=md^2x/dt^2

ON your LHS can you explain why you took mg as positive and tension as negative from my interpretation earlier I did the opposite

Original post by Student 999

ON your LHS can you explain why you took mg as positive and tension as negative from my interpretation earlier I did the opposite

You have to remember x has a sign and direction. It is measured downwards.

The force of gravity is always downwards (in the +x direction) so is mg.

The tension in the spring is upwards for x>0 so it is in the opposite direction to x and you have to write it as -kx to show this.

.

As above, when you have a positive (downwards) displacement.

For part a), in equilibrium, the spring tension must act upwards as gravity acts downwards so the resultant force is zero

mg + T = 0

mg is the load which is acting to extend the spring so in equilibrium it must be 24e, where the extension e=x-0.35. However, the tension in the spring (force pair, Newton 3) is -24e. Note that gravity is a constant force and for a vertical spring, its effect is to shift the equilibrium position downwards from the natural length to the position mg/24+0.35. It does not affect the dynamics otherwise.

For part b) as described above, the resultant force on P (positive downwards) must be

F = mx'' = mg - 24(x-0.35) - 14x'

gravity acts to extend x downwards, the tension in the spring (for a positive extension) pulls upwards and the resistance acts against the velocity as a re-tarding force. So just rearrange. Note when x=1.167, then mg-24(1.167-0.35) = 0 as youd expect as its the equilibrium extension.

The 14 on the right hand side of the final ODE corresponds g+24*0.35/m. You could have written ithe ODE as

z'' + 7z' + 12z = 0

where z = x-14 = x-(g+24*0.35/m). Here gravity has no effect on the dynamics and the variable z is zero at the equilibrium length calculated in part a (which is a vertical shift due to gravity). So z would correspond to the extension about the spring position 1.167.

For part a), in equilibrium, the spring tension must act upwards as gravity acts downwards so the resultant force is zero

mg + T = 0

mg is the load which is acting to extend the spring so in equilibrium it must be 24e, where the extension e=x-0.35. However, the tension in the spring (force pair, Newton 3) is -24e. Note that gravity is a constant force and for a vertical spring, its effect is to shift the equilibrium position downwards from the natural length to the position mg/24+0.35. It does not affect the dynamics otherwise.

For part b) as described above, the resultant force on P (positive downwards) must be

F = mx'' = mg - 24(x-0.35) - 14x'

gravity acts to extend x downwards, the tension in the spring (for a positive extension) pulls upwards and the resistance acts against the velocity as a re-tarding force. So just rearrange. Note when x=1.167, then mg-24(1.167-0.35) = 0 as youd expect as its the equilibrium extension.

The 14 on the right hand side of the final ODE corresponds g+24*0.35/m. You could have written ithe ODE as

z'' + 7z' + 12z = 0

where z = x-14 = x-(g+24*0.35/m). Here gravity has no effect on the dynamics and the variable z is zero at the equilibrium length calculated in part a (which is a vertical shift due to gravity). So z would correspond to the extension about the spring position 1.167.

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by AlanT12

You have to remember x has a sign and direction. It is measured downwards.

The force of gravity is always downwards (in the +x direction) so is mg.

The tension in the spring is upwards for x>0 so it is in the opposite direction to x and you have to write it as -kx to show this.

.

The force of gravity is always downwards (in the +x direction) so is mg.

The tension in the spring is upwards for x>0 so it is in the opposite direction to x and you have to write it as -kx to show this.

.

Thanks I didn't notice in the question displacement is taken as positive downwards

- Alevel physics in engineering
- Further Maths Mecahnics
- AQA A level further maths Paper 1, 25th May
- OCR A Level Further Mathematics Pure core 2 Y541/01 - 8 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat]
- need help answering physics question
- Aqa a -level further maths paper 2 and 3
- Topics to expect in AQA A Level Further Maths Paper 2
- Physics vs Chemistry A level
- A level physics simple harmonic motion help please
- Edexcel physics (IAL) Unit 5, 5th June 2018
- Physics A level
- What are the best A-level mathmatics and further maths textbooks?
- a =w2x prove it pls
- OCR A Level Further Maths Core Pure 1 - 25 May Exam Chat
- How big is the jump from highers to advanced highers?
- Help Needed proving equation
- How to revise for physics practical endorsement?
- AQA A-level Further Mathematics Paper 2 (7367/2) - 5th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- SHM
- A level physics SHM mcq help

- MSc Criminology and Criminal Justice Applicants
- Amazon Apprenticeships 2024
- NICS Staff Officer and Deputy Principal recruitment 2022 2023
- AQA A-Level English Literature B Paper 2 (7716/2) - 8th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- University of Cambridge Foundation Year 2024
- English at UCL
- vet nursing uni 2024
- Nursing 2024
- Uni virgin
- UCL English 2024
- JP Morgan Technology Degree Apprenticeship 2024
- Why is Rachel Zegler so hated?
- Isaac Physics help
- Uni of cardiff
- Jaguar (JLR) Degree apprenticeships 2024
- Loughborough Uni
- uploading GCSE and A levels certificates
- Durham Uni
- Uni of York
- Derby Medical School

- S4 gyg journal!
- NERC and BBSRC DTP PhD 2024
- bristol offer holders day
- City of London Academies Highgate Hill (Islington) and Shoreditch Park (Hackney)
- difficulty finding a job?
- Imperial Mech Eng 2024 Interviews
- Uni of exeter
- Previously used 2 years UG funding - what now?
- Uni of Bath
- Nottingham Uni
- Target Oxbridge 2024-2025
- Serena La Sorcière and the Pursuit of Greater Knowledge
- [Official thread] Durham University 2024 Applicants
- Clinical Psychology or developmental psychology
- Southampton Uni - help
- Sheffield pastoral side
- LSE MSc Finance 2024-25
- UCAS Extra UCL
- Exam in 2 days! Feeling OK.
- Official: University of Sheffield A100 2024 entry

- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023

- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023