Integration quick question
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Htx_x346
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
How did they integrate this in one step
Last edited by Htx_x346; 4 weeks ago
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges:
19
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Htx_x346
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
(Original post by mqb2766)
Its really just the (reverse) chain rule.
Its really just the (reverse) chain rule.
i was tryna do integration by parts lol
how do you identify when to use reverse chain rule?
0
reply
username5960917
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by Htx_x346)
OHHH
i was tryna do integration by parts lol
how do you identify when to use reverse chain rule?
OHHH
i was tryna do integration by parts lol
how do you identify when to use reverse chain rule?
1
reply
tonyiptony
Badges:
8
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
(Original post by Htx_x346)
OHHH
i was tryna do integration by parts lol
how do you identify when to use reverse chain rule?
OHHH
i was tryna do integration by parts lol
how do you identify when to use reverse chain rule?
But usually when one part of the integrand is the derivative of the other, reverse chain rule (i.e. substitution) is the way.
For instance, for this question, the numerator is the derivative of whatever is inside the square root in the denominator. so letting u="stuff inside square root" is natural.
Sidenote: Try considering substitution before IBP. Integrals requiring IBP often has a function you want to differentiate.
Last edited by tonyiptony; 4 weeks ago
1
reply
Htx_x346
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
(Original post by tonyiptony)
It comes with practice and recognizing patterns.
But usually when one part of the integrand is the derivative of the other, reverse chain rule (i.e. substitution) is the way.
For instance, for this question, the number is the derivative of whatever is inside the square root in the denominator. so letting u="stuff inside square root" is natural.
Sidenote: Try considering substitution before IBP. Integrals requiring IBP often has a function you want to differentiate.
It comes with practice and recognizing patterns.
But usually when one part of the integrand is the derivative of the other, reverse chain rule (i.e. substitution) is the way.
For instance, for this question, the number is the derivative of whatever is inside the square root in the denominator. so letting u="stuff inside square root" is natural.
Sidenote: Try considering substitution before IBP. Integrals requiring IBP often has a function you want to differentiate.
0
reply
tonyiptony
Badges:
8
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report
#7
(Original post by Htx_x346)
Thank you but what do you mean by “often has a function you want to differentiate” ?
Thank you but what do you mean by “often has a function you want to differentiate” ?

Wouldn't it be nice to differentiate the stray

Another one would be

We don't know how to integrate

There are some clues, usually. Like a logarithmic function, an inverse trig function, a stray x^n, that is way more convenient to differentiate; or something like a product of 2 types of functions (e.g.

0
reply
Htx_x346
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
(Original post by tonyiptony)
Say the good ol' classic
.
Wouldn't it be nice to differentiate the stray
, just to make it go away? IBP works here.
Another one would be
.
We don't know how to integrate
, but differentiating it is super easy. IBP also works perfectly here.
There are some clues, usually. Like a logarithmic function, an inverse trig function, a stray x^n, that is way more convenient to differentiate; or something like a product of 2 types of functions (e.g.
), etc. Try to do more integrals and see if you can discover some other clues yourself!
Say the good ol' classic

Wouldn't it be nice to differentiate the stray

Another one would be

We don't know how to integrate

There are some clues, usually. Like a logarithmic function, an inverse trig function, a stray x^n, that is way more convenient to differentiate; or something like a product of 2 types of functions (e.g.

0
reply
tonyiptony
Badges:
8
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report
#9
(Original post by Htx_x346)
For the first example wouldn’t it just be easier to use reverse chain rule?
For the first example wouldn’t it just be easier to use reverse chain rule?
0
reply
mqb2766
Badges:
19
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report
#10
(Original post by wiseowlz72)
f'(x)/f(x)
f'(x)/f(x)
x * (4-x^2)^(-1/2)
Then you can spot that its of the form
k * du/dx * u^(-1/2)
where u = 4-x^2 and k is a constant. So it integrates to something like
u^(1/2)
Last edited by mqb2766; 4 weeks ago
1
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top