Back
to top
Evaluation for AO2 15 Marker
Watch this thread
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
zingy1
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
I wanted to know what the difference is between explaining strengths and weaknesses and evaluation in Philosophy and Ethics and also, why aren't strengths and weaknesses alone evaluation? What is it that I have to do to ensure I'm evaluating?
1
reply
zingy1
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
(Original post by zingy1)
I wanted to know what the difference is between explaining strengths and weaknesses and evaluation in Philosophy and Ethics and also, why aren't strengths and weaknesses alone evaluation? What is it that I have to do to ensure I'm evaluating?
I wanted to know what the difference is between explaining strengths and weaknesses and evaluation in Philosophy and Ethics and also, why aren't strengths and weaknesses alone evaluation? What is it that I have to do to ensure I'm evaluating?
0
reply
Joe312
Badges:
17
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
(Original post by zingy1)
I wanted to know what the difference is between explaining strengths and weaknesses and evaluation in Philosophy and Ethics and also, why aren't strengths and weaknesses alone evaluation? What is it that I have to do to ensure I'm evaluating?
I wanted to know what the difference is between explaining strengths and weaknesses and evaluation in Philosophy and Ethics and also, why aren't strengths and weaknesses alone evaluation? What is it that I have to do to ensure I'm evaluating?
Better yet, it's when you judge whether a particular strength counters a particular weakness, or whether a particular weakness counters a particular strength.
It's when you assess whether a weakness could be defended against, or whether a supposed strength could be criticised.
Evaluation is when you judge which side of a debate is right and why.
This is all very different from merely explaining/listing the strengths and weaknesses.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
