Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PeeWeeDan)
    Because the BNP don't like my ilk.
    And any other ilk that's different from them. I wouldn't be "pure" in their eyes. With that said, these BNP / White nationalist threads are depressing and annoying tbh. They make me feel unwanted in my own country because my skin colour's a tad bit darker then themselves. :rolleyes:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheMeister)
    Erm, suffragettes? They starved themselves in prison so women could vote.
    do you not see how ridiculous that sounds? over simplification of a long and complex historical and political issue much?
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    And you dare to call yourself a libertarian? :confused: No, people have an absolute right to vote. It's none of your business who they vote for. You can't take away someone's liberty simply because you believe they'll take away yours in the future. Seriously, wtf.

    Voting is a privilege? :confused: You do realize that removing someone's right to vote is one of the most illiberal things anyone can do, right? That makes you far worse than the BNPers you oppose.
    It's funny, but there are a few self-declared 'libertarians' knocking around TSR who are happily critical of the very idea of democracy.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oswy)
    It's funny, but there are a few self-declared 'libertarians' knocking around TSR who are happily critical of the very idea of democracy.
    Of course we're critical of the very idea of democracy. I don't believe in the legitimacy of government full stop, so what makes you think I'll suddenly be fine with it if it's selected by some supposedly representative democratic method?
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pavlik)
    It's not your country, kaffir.

    You are welcome to your own country, go there.

    You are not just a tad darker than Europeans, you are not our kin. Some Indians have a similar skin colour to us, but they are still not our kin. Portuguese are generally a tad darker than Britons, but they are genetically similar to us, therefore they are our kin - see the difference?

    A race is like an extended family, and you are not part of mine.
    Get out of here.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bagration)
    Presumably you are a Labour voter IRL since you want Labour to win TSR Commons.

    You said: "Well, I've always thought that we either have all rights or no rights."

    Who was it that banned:
    Smoking in public areas?
    Foxhunting?

    Who was it that brought in:
    28 Days Detention Without Trial and tried to up it to 42
    ID Cards
    Further gun control measures

    Who was it that made our central bank unaccountable to the people?

    Who was it that used taxpayer money to nationalise a business?

    Who was it that made us the surveillance capital of Europe?

    Who was it that brought in regulation on racial speech?

    Labour: Who needs rights as long as we have tyranny?
    Marvellous - everything I hate about the "left wing" summarised perfectly.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pavlik)
    No, I like it here. Things need to be said about our race-replacement, before they can be done. Whilst the internet is a trivial means of communicating, it is better than nothing, in spare time.
    If you think it's so trivial, it's hardly likely that you're going to convince others to follow you.
    Offline

    3
    Pavlik, you're seriously making me consider only fighting to the point of GBH to defend your right to say the racist trash you keep posting.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Is it really so offensive to so many people that somebody doesn't believe the general consensus on race and ethnicity?
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Bagration)
    Is it really so offensive to so many people that somebody doesn't believe the general consensus on race and ethnicity?
    I'm not exactly a champion of political correctness, but his posts continually cross lines and venture into the territory of the baseless, the unscientific, and the nonsensical. There's rejecting the general consensus and then there's just making stuff up. It's annoying.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pavlik)
    They are brainwashed.

    Incidentally, the consensus on race/ kin in the non-white countries, and amongst our ancestors, is that racial nepotism is good and the defence of territory by racial and kin groups is highly important.
    We're just nice people.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by numb3rb0y)
    I'm not exactly a champion of political correctness, but his posts continually cross lines and venture into the territory of the baseless, the unscientific, and the nonsensical. There's rejecting the general consensus and then there's just making stuff up. It's annoying.
    There is really no evidence that races, even as non-biological social groups (if that is true which I don't believe it to be) are equal. Make of that what you will but it is certainly not a baseless, unscientific, and nonsensical statement.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bagration)
    There is really no evidence that races, even as non-biological social groups (if that is true which I don't believe it to be) are equal. Make of that what you will but it is certainly not a baseless, unscientific, and nonsensical statement.
    Baggers, the phrase "we're all people" is a bit of a cliché, but do you not agree with it; therefore throwing the inequality theory out if the window?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Interesting stuff on race and intelligence
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Bagration)
    There is really no evidence that races, even as non-biological social groups (if that is true which I don't believe it to be) are equal. Make of that what you will but it is certainly not a baseless, unscientific, and nonsensical statement.
    Oh, I certainly wouldn't argue that races (if the concept even truly exists, which is highly contentious to say the least) are all the same as there are clear biological differences between groups of humans, but Pavlik's views on supremacy and separatism are unfounded silliness, as is his talk of brainwashing and the like. It lowers the tone of debate, and I really don't like championing his right to express that trash.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by numb3rb0y)
    Oh, I certainly wouldn't argue that races (if the concept even truly exists, which is highly contentious to say the least) are all the same as there are clear biological differences between groups of humans, but Pavlik's views on supremacy and separatism are unfounded silliness, as is his talk of brainwashing and the like. It lowers the tone of debate, and I really don't like championing his right to express that trash.
    Is there any other trash you don't champion or is it just racism? I would be quite disappointed if it was the case that a Libertarian found racism especially awful.

    Rockrunride, I think people the only equality any sort of society ought to enact via legislation in any manner should be equality beneath the law. That is the only morally just equality and the only equality that does not slowly erode to tyranny.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pavlik)
    Supremacy of caucasians and most groups of east asians over negroes in intelligence is blindingly obvious
    :O but racism = white supremacy! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bagration)
    Is there any other trash you don't champion or is it just racism? I would be quite disappointed if it was the case that a Libertarian found racism especially awful.

    Rockrunride, I think people the only equality any sort of society ought to enact via legislation in any manner should be equality beneath the law. That is the only morally just equality and the only equality that does not slowly erode to tyranny.
    He's big on animal rights (supporting vandalism for the cause) but he argues things like an intelligent person, rather than the usual morons championing these things.
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Bagration)
    Is there any other trash you don't champion or is it just racism? I would be quite disappointed if it was the case that a Libertarian found racism especially awful.
    You misunderstand me. I very much believe in his right to be as racist as he wants, it's just one of those things that makes me think extra hard about it. Others would probably be people supporting the police or championing socialism.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by numb3rb0y)
    You misunderstand me. I very much believe in his right to be as racist as he wants, it's just one of those things that makes me think extra hard about it. Others would probably be people supporting the police or championing socialism.
    :gthumb:
 
 
 
Poll
Are you going to a festival?
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.