I am currently representing an OU student at the OIAHE with respect to a complaint against what we consider to be a biased and unfair investigation and appeals process. The above experiences are typical as I have been made repeatedly aware, Our case has specific mitigating factors which the OU has consistently ignored and/or denied, with no attempt to address the core exculpatory evidence. Such factors may or may not be relevant to individual cases above, but if you would be willing to go to my first message where I briefly explain the unbelievable issues, and you have personally, or know of any else, who has had a similar experience I would welcome any feedback.
Unfortunately I suggest from experience, despite claims otherwise, it appears in practice, the burden of proof requirements are significantly skewed to the advantage of the institution.
I hope you all to receive a fair and unbiased decision!