The Student Room Group

The Liverpool FC Thread XVII

Scroll to see replies

Reply 760

Fabinho’s touch :sigh:

Bajcetic should’ve dragged Modric down but it never appears that we teach/tell our players to professionally **** players up who are breaking on us.

Reply 761

Original post
by Mess.
Could see that coming right through that whole sequence of events.

Gomez turning his back on the ball is criminal.


Gomez needs to leave.

Reply 762

Original post
by Wired_1800
Gomez needs to leave.


The new 4 year deal was another symptom of the nonsense ‘loyalty’ cost programme we have been dealing in. He hasn’t got any knees, his concentration has gone but we kept him out of some ridiculous concept of loyalty for a player who can’t repay in ability.

Reply 763

Original post
by Mess.
The new 4 year deal was another symptom of the nonsense ‘loyalty’ cost programme we have been dealing in. He hasn’t got any knees, his concentration has gone but we kept him out of some ridiculous concept of loyalty for a player who can’t repay in ability.

Klopp needs to reform the squad and release many dodgy players.

Reply 764

Original post
by Mess.
The new 4 year deal was another symptom of the nonsense ‘loyalty’ cost programme we have been dealing in. He hasn’t got any knees, his concentration has gone but we kept him out of some ridiculous concept of loyalty for a player who can’t repay in ability.

Don't get why you didn't bomb him to Villa when you had the chance.

I think the only thing I could say is for depth due to CB injuries he may have been useful, but he's not a starter for you guys.

Reply 765

Original post
by bj27
Don't get why you didn't bomb him to Villa when you had the chance.

I think the only thing I could say is for depth due to CB injuries he may have been useful, but he's not a starter for you guys.


Liverpools exact problem is retaining players to cover for injury who are more injury prone than the players they are covering.

Goes back to Sturridge but now includes Gomez, Chamberlain, Firmino and Keita.

I was 100% behind the £25m Gomez to Villa train. He would have probably been their best defender but he just isn’t cut out at the top level because he doesn’t have knees.

Don’t even get me started on Phillips still being at the club. We have no money but refuse to sell a player we will never allow on the pitch, whilst wasting money on his wages.

Reply 766

Klopp struggles to explain

https://youtu.be/uGwKt7FHF3w

Let me help. His team were statuesque in defence, not marking anyone, like a table- football team

Reply 767

5-2 😂😂😂
Original post
by Mohammed_80
5-2 😂😂😂


As I said: same procedure as every time. Liverpool will never beat Madrid. Nemesis forever.

Reply 769

Original post
by bj27
They didn't let that 4-0 slide and now you've become their whipping boys like Salah Vs Norwich.

Definitely expect some cuckoldry again.


I mean that was next level cuckoldry last night..

Ancelotti seems to know exactly how Klopp likes to be shafted.

Reply 770

Original post
by Mess.
The new 4 year deal was another symptom of the nonsense ‘loyalty’ cost programme we have been dealing in. He hasn’t got any knees, his concentration has gone but we kept him out of some ridiculous concept of loyalty for a player who can’t repay in ability.


I think more to do with that he knows the club / doesn't ask for a lot of money / doesnt kick up a fuss when not playing / is homegrown

Reply 771

Original post
by NJA
Klopp struggles to explain

https://youtu.be/uGwKt7FHF3w

Let me help. His team were statuesque in defence, not marking anyone, like a table- football team


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdJH1dYI1gE&ab_channel=alfzgaming

Reply 772

Original post
by Zerforax
I think more to do with that he knows the club / doesn't ask for a lot of money / doesnt kick up a fuss when not playing / is homegrown


Explain Nat Phillips and Gomez still being at the club?

Reply 773

Original post
by bj27
Explain Nat Phillips and Gomez still being at the club?


Both homegrown, both on wages which are not huge. Gomez only playing as Matip and Konate both injured at the moment otherwise he should be 4th choice.

I presume big Nat has some saucy blackmail material on Klopp or the CEO otherwise why/how hasn't he been sold?

Also the club are too cheap to buy another decent CB. Look at the lack of investment:

Konate - summer 2021 for 40mil (after we played a season with 3 CBs and they all got injured)
Kabak - loan signing Jan 2021
Ben Davies - who? signed Jan 2021 and didn't play at all before being sold
Van Dijk - signed Jan 2018 for record fee
Klavan - £5mil in summer 2016
Matip - free signing in summer 2016

I mean that is literally all the CBs we've signed in like 7 years. Chelsea bought more CBs than that in 6 months.

Reply 774

Original post
by Zerforax
Both homegrown, both on wages which are not huge. Gomez only playing as Matip and Konate both injured at the moment otherwise he should be 4th choice.

I presume big Nat has some saucy blackmail material on Klopp or the CEO otherwise why/how hasn't he been sold?

Also the club are too cheap to buy another decent CB. Look at the lack of investment:

Konate - summer 2021 for 40mil (after we played a season with 3 CBs and they all got injured)
Kabak - loan signing Jan 2021
Ben Davies - who? signed Jan 2021 and didn't play at all before being sold
Van Dijk - signed Jan 2018 for record fee
Klavan - £5mil in summer 2016
Matip - free signing in summer 2016

I mean that is literally all the CBs we've signed in like 7 years. Chelsea bought more CBs than that in 6 months.

I guess part of it is Klopp not actually having any money to do what he wants.

Reply 775

Original post
by bj27
I guess part of it is Klopp not actually having any money to do what he wants.


Maybe that held water early on in Klopp's tenure but we make so much in revenues now. Klopp has managed CL football in every season except his first 1.5 years. We're reached 3 CL finals and a EL final. Commercial revenues are the highest they have been.

Not sure why we don't have money to spend. I'm not expecting Boehly levels of investment but we spend like we're poorer than Everton.
Original post
by bj27
Madrid will find a way to jam you guys again but will be interesting.


Indeed, Madrid found a way again to beat Liverpool. The reds always turn into Loserpool when Real Madrid is the opponent. It is like the cat-and-mouse-game.

Reply 777

Original post
by Zerforax
Maybe that held water early on in Klopp's tenure but we make so much in revenues now. Klopp has managed CL football in every season except his first 1.5 years. We're reached 3 CL finals and a EL final. Commercial revenues are the highest they have been.

Not sure why we don't have money to spend. I'm not expecting Boehly levels of investment but we spend like we're poorer than Everton.

It's a combination of a high wage bill (wasted on injury prone players) and paying back the loan from FSG for the stadium expansion and new training ground. Basically there isn't much cash flow to fund new signings unless we sell players or FSG loan the club more money which they don't want to do. Hence why FSG are seeking investment for the club.

Reply 778

Original post
by samir12
It's a combination of a high wage bill (wasted on injury prone players) and paying back the loan from FSG for the stadium expansion and new training ground. Basically there isn't much cash flow to fund new signings unless we sell players or FSG loan the club more money which they don't want to do. Hence why FSG are seeking investment for the club.


It's not like we have tons of players on huge wages that we want to get rid off. Yes we have a few players who could be moved on but even the squad players have done well in moments when called on, even if not consistently. Last season we play every game in the season because the whole squad contributed.

Sure we have a high wage bill but revenues keep climbing too. I don't think it's a high % of wages to turnover as a ratio.

The FSG loans were interest free so it's not a huge expense. The stadium expansions (various stages) pays itself back as we make higher revenues from the stadium now (first time we made over £100mil I think?)

Yes the AXA Training will need to be paid off as not revenue generating but no doubt an investment into the infrastructure of the club.

I'm not even convinced FSG are looking for investment for the club? They sold that stake in FSG to Redbird a while back (obviously higher up and covered all their sports investments, not just LFC). I think it's just risk management for them. Earn back money over and above the initial investment all those years ago and keep trying to create value.

Personally I think they saw the numbers for the distressed Chelsea sale and their eyes lit up and they thought they could get a big chunky price (no forced sale, bigger global brand etc). Seems like the Man Utd sale has attracted more attention and probably put a dampener on what they hoped to get for LFC.

Reply 779

Original post
by Zerforax
It's not like we have tons of players on huge wages that we want to get rid off. Yes we have a few players who could be moved on but even the squad players have done well in moments when called on, even if not consistently. Last season we play every game in the season because the whole squad contributed.

Sure we have a high wage bill but revenues keep climbing too. I don't think it's a high % of wages to turnover as a ratio.

The FSG loans were interest free so it's not a huge expense. The stadium expansions (various stages) pays itself back as we make higher revenues from the stadium now (first time we made over £100mil I think?)

Yes the AXA Training will need to be paid off as not revenue generating but no doubt an investment into the infrastructure of the club.

I'm not even convinced FSG are looking for investment for the club? They sold that stake in FSG to Redbird a while back (obviously higher up and covered all their sports investments, not just LFC). I think it's just risk management for them. Earn back money over and above the initial investment all those years ago and keep trying to create value.

Personally I think they saw the numbers for the distressed Chelsea sale and their eyes lit up and they thought they could get a big chunky price (no forced sale, bigger global brand etc). Seems like the Man Utd sale has attracted more attention and probably put a dampener on what they hoped to get for LFC.


The first stadium expansion would of paid itself back but the second expansion hasn't finished yet so won't have paid itself back fully for another few years so in that time we would still paying back the loans from current revenues. Swiss Ramble did a good analysis on Liverpools financial so worth having a read on there.

They wanted to test the waters to see what they could get for a full sale but also want to see what minority investment they can get. As you said, it looks like they explored the former and wasn't as enticing as they were hoping so are just going to see what they can get with a minority investment, there is a quote from John Henry that confirms that they are looking for investment. (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64711305)
(edited 2 years ago)

Quick Reply