Iâ€™ve been gliding through this section as it seems more relatable and more common sense but this question has tripped me up a little.

See question below:

As f=ma, if force =1200-320=880 this is consistent throughout.

At point A it passes at speed of 12.

It accelerates to 26 in 7 seconds. I believe I need to find a(acceleration) that proves mass=440kg..

If I said 880=440a then this tells me acceleration is 2. I need to find this value I believe before it reaches point a.

Obviously, Iâ€™m a little confused, so sorry if my wording doesnâ€™t make sense

Would I be correct in saying the intial velocity is 12 when t=0?

See question below:

As f=ma, if force =1200-320=880 this is consistent throughout.

At point A it passes at speed of 12.

It accelerates to 26 in 7 seconds. I believe I need to find a(acceleration) that proves mass=440kg..

If I said 880=440a then this tells me acceleration is 2. I need to find this value I believe before it reaches point a.

Obviously, Iâ€™m a little confused, so sorry if my wording doesnâ€™t make sense

Would I be correct in saying the intial velocity is 12 when t=0?

(edited 1 year ago)

Scroll to see replies

Original post by KingRich

Iâ€™ve been gliding through this section as it seems more relatable and more common sense but this question has tripped me up a little.

See question below:

As f=ma, if force =1200-320=880 this is consistent throughout.

At point A it passes at speed of 12.

It accelerates to 26 in 7 seconds. I believe I need to find a(acceleration) that proves mass=440kg..

If I said 880=440a then this tells me acceleration is 2. I need to find this value I believe before it reaches point a.

Obviously, Iâ€™m a little confused, so sorry if my wording doesnâ€™t make sense

Would I be correct in saying the intial velocity is 12 when t=0?

See question below:

As f=ma, if force =1200-320=880 this is consistent throughout.

At point A it passes at speed of 12.

It accelerates to 26 in 7 seconds. I believe I need to find a(acceleration) that proves mass=440kg..

If I said 880=440a then this tells me acceleration is 2. I need to find this value I believe before it reaches point a.

Obviously, Iâ€™m a little confused, so sorry if my wording doesnâ€™t make sense

Would I be correct in saying the intial velocity is 12 when t=0?

Youve pretty much done it v = u+at and f=ma so

26 = 12 + 7a

880 = ma

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Youve pretty much done it v = u+at and f=ma so

26 = 12 + 7a

880 = ma

26 = 12 + 7a

880 = ma

Ahh, you know what. I had a silly moment. I legit mis-read 26ms^-1 as the acceleration value and not as final velocity . Iâ€™m sure if Iâ€™d come had a little break and re-read I would have realised but Iâ€™ve got deadlines

Original post by mqb2766

Youve pretty much done it v = u+at and f=ma so

26 = 12 + 7a

880 = ma

26 = 12 + 7a

880 = ma

Without sounding completely dumb.

Part b, would suggest if the driving force is being reduced, then thereâ€™s a braking force involved.

Part a showed that acceleration was 2ms^-2 to reach 26ms^-1â€¦.

Hence f=ma would be 1200-f(new force)=(440)(-2) so, that our new force =320N

Original post by KingRich

Without sounding completely dumb.

Part b, would suggest if the driving force is being reduced, then thereâ€™s a braking force involved.

Part a showed that acceleration was 2ms^-2 to reach 26ms^-1â€¦.

Hence f=ma would be 1200-f(new force)=(440)(-2) so, that our new force =320N

Part b, would suggest if the driving force is being reduced, then thereâ€™s a braking force involved.

Part a showed that acceleration was 2ms^-2 to reach 26ms^-1â€¦.

Hence f=ma would be 1200-f(new force)=(440)(-2) so, that our new force =320N

Not quite. Right answer, but wrong reasoning.

If its travelling with constant velocity, what is the acceleration? So how is the driving force related to the resistance? Note its a "state" question, so no working is involved.

There is no braking here, just less driving force.

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Not quite. Right answer, but wrong reasoning.

If its travelling with constant velocity, what is the acceleration? So how is the driving force related to the resistance? Note its a "state" question, so no working is involved.

There is no braking here, just less driving force.

If its travelling with constant velocity, what is the acceleration? So how is the driving force related to the resistance? Note its a "state" question, so no working is involved.

There is no braking here, just less driving force.

As per Newtonâ€™s first law, an object remains at constant velocity or at rest unless acted on by a force.

Hence, zero acceleration or deceleration. Iâ€™ll get back to this. Food

Original post by KingRich

As per Newtonâ€™s first law, an object remains at constant velocity or at rest unless acted on by a force.

Hence, zero acceleration or deceleration. Iâ€™ll get back to this. Food

Hence, zero acceleration or deceleration. Iâ€™ll get back to this. Food

Correct, but you should be able to simply write the answer down as the resistance is 320 N so the driving force must be ... for the resultant force to be zero (zero acceleration).

Original post by mqb2766

Correct, but you should be able to simply write the answer down as the resistance is 320 N so the driving force must be ... for the resultant force to be zero (zero acceleration).

You see Iâ€™ve been questioning that due to the wording of the question. Obviously when you take away the driving force youâ€™re left with the resistance force, I.e the resistance of the road on your tires when youâ€™re driving.

However, as the law states no force is acting on the object when the velocity is constant, then why does the resistance force still remain?

Unless the law specifically means a force that is caused by someone/something like an action/an active force and ignores any a force thatâ€™s natural. Ah, do you understand what Iâ€™m trying to say? Lol

Original post by KingRich

You see Iâ€™ve been questioning that due to the wording of the question. Obviously when you take away the driving force youâ€™re left with the resistance force, I.e the resistance of the road on your tires when youâ€™re driving.

However, as the law states no force is acting on the object when the velocity is constant, then why does the resistance force still remain?

Unless the law specifically means a force that is caused by someone/something like an action/an active force and ignores any a force thatâ€™s natural. Ah, do you understand what Iâ€™m trying to say? Lol

However, as the law states no force is acting on the object when the velocity is constant, then why does the resistance force still remain?

Unless the law specifically means a force that is caused by someone/something like an action/an active force and ignores any a force thatâ€™s natural. Ah, do you understand what Iâ€™m trying to say? Lol

In newton 2, you have

f = ma

where f is the resultant (or total) force acting on the body. Here

f = driving - resistance

as driving is in the direction of motion and resistance is in the opposite direction. So if the resultant force is 0, then there is zero acceleration.

Original post by KingRich

â€¦.as the law states no force is acting on the object when the velocity is constantâ€¦

The law states no â€˜resultant forceâ€™ acts on the object when velocity is constant. There can be forces, but they just have to cancel out.

Original post by mqb2766

In newton 2, you have

f = ma

where f is the resultant (or total) force acting on the body. Here

f = driving - resistance

as driving is in the direction of motion and resistance is in the opposite direction. So if the resultant force is 0, then there is zero acceleration.

f = ma

where f is the resultant (or total) force acting on the body. Here

f = driving - resistance

as driving is in the direction of motion and resistance is in the opposite direction. So if the resultant force is 0, then there is zero acceleration.

Right, right. It makes sense now.

Original post by KingRich

Right, right. It makes sense now.

Its the same scenario as you reaching terminal velocity when falling from a plane when gravity and air resistance balance so there is zero acceleration.

Original post by mqb2766

Its the same scenario as you reaching terminal velocity when falling from a plane when gravity and air resistance balance so there is zero acceleration.

Is this what they call equilibrium? I believe thatâ€™s the next part of the section.

just to finish the question lol part c.

Iâ€™m correct In approaching this as a multi-stage question? Hence, I should find the displacement for part a first or?

Original post by KingRich

Is this what they call equilibrium? I believe thatâ€™s the next part of the section.

just to finish the question lol part c.

Iâ€™m correct In approaching this as a multi-stage question? Hence, I should find the displacement for part a first or?

just to finish the question lol part c.

Iâ€™m correct In approaching this as a multi-stage question? Hence, I should find the displacement for part a first or?

Yes, you need to include part a in the displacement calculation, though you could recognize that the veloicty-time graph is a trapezium (assuming you model the deceleration due to resistance correctly) which is the same another question you asked about so you could get the displacement from the trapezium in 1 calculation.

Original post by mqb2766

Yes, you need to include part a in the displacement calculation, though you could recognize that the veloicty-time graph is a trapezium (assuming you model the deceleration due to resistance correctly) which is the same another question you asked about so you could get the displacement from the trapezium in 1 calculation.

this is the graph that I found where point a starts at t=0.

Does this look about right to you?

Oh, it drives for 12 seconds so 12=19 on the graph

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by KingRich

this is the graph that I found where point a starts at t=0.

Does this look about right to you?

this is the graph that I found where point a starts at t=0.

Does this look about right to you?

Yes, but I forgot that the "trapezium" doesnt start at zero velocity so it is a bit different. So do

first trapezium + rectangle + triangle

areas to get the total distance/displacement covered. You can form them as suvat

s = (u+v)t/2

for the first trapezium

s = ut

for the rectangle

s = (u+0)t/2

for the triangle. Thinking of it as suvat is probably overkill in this case and finding areas is porbably simpler to visualize? Note you don't need to know the acceleration/deceleration if you use

s = average velocity * time

"suvat" or area.

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Yes, but I forgot that the "trapezium" doesnt start at zero velocity so it is a bit different. So do

first trapezium + rectangle + triangle

areas to get the total distance/displacement covered. You can form them as suvat

s = (u+v)t/2

for the first trapezium

s = ut

for the rectangle

s = (u+0)t/2

for the triangle. Thinking of it as suvat is probably overkill in this case and finding areas is porbably simpler to visualize? Note you don't need to know the acceleration/deceleration if you use

s = average velocity * time

"suvat" or area.

first trapezium + rectangle + triangle

areas to get the total distance/displacement covered. You can form them as suvat

s = (u+v)t/2

for the first trapezium

s = ut

for the rectangle

s = (u+0)t/2

for the triangle. Thinking of it as suvat is probably overkill in this case and finding areas is porbably simpler to visualize? Note you don't need to know the acceleration/deceleration if you use

s = average velocity * time

"suvat" or area.

Mmm, thatâ€™s what Iâ€™ve done. So treated it as a 3 stage question.

So, first stage: s=133m second stage: s=312

third stage:

is my deceleration correct, as I seem to be coming up short in the distance. I found that base was 25.9 seconds but this suggests that the final stage is 338m

The book states 910m total i seem to be off by at least 300m

Edit:

So, I originally calculated the deceleration based on t=12 second but that would suggest that the second stage stops at v=0.

The third stage only gives an initial velocity and an end velocity. It doesnâ€™t tell you how many t later that it stops. I have to somehow find out the hypotenuse with only a given height.

Or, I consider the natural resistance is 320 with zero driving force then as f=ma, theoretically speaking 320=440a would tell me resistance =0.7272

(edited 1 year ago)

Original post by mqb2766

Yes, but I forgot that the "trapezium" doesnt start at zero velocity so it is a bit different. So do

first trapezium + rectangle + triangle

areas to get the total distance/displacement covered. You can form them as suvat

s = (u+v)t/2

for the first trapezium

s = ut

for the rectangle

s = (u+0)t/2

for the triangle. Thinking of it as suvat is probably overkill in this case and finding areas is porbably simpler to visualize? Note you don't need to know the acceleration/deceleration if you use

s = average velocity * time

"suvat" or area.

first trapezium + rectangle + triangle

areas to get the total distance/displacement covered. You can form them as suvat

s = (u+v)t/2

for the first trapezium

s = ut

for the rectangle

s = (u+0)t/2

for the triangle. Thinking of it as suvat is probably overkill in this case and finding areas is porbably simpler to visualize? Note you don't need to know the acceleration/deceleration if you use

s = average velocity * time

"suvat" or area.

So, I reproached the question using my brain this time and I believe I found my way.

Original post by mqb2766

Not checked the numbers carefully, but looks about right. In the last part a should be negative as its decelerating so youd have

0 = u^2 - 2s*0.72727

which is why you have a negative sign kicking about which gets "forgotten" about.

0 = u^2 - 2s*0.72727

which is why you have a negative sign kicking about which gets "forgotten" about.

I knew the displacement would be positive, so I guess I kinda just ignored that fact but I recall for the future. A little proud moment for myself ðŸ˜…

I definitely feel like talking out loud or discussing helps me find my way.

(edited 1 year ago)

- Force time diagram with mass on wheel rotating anticlockwise
- A-Level Mechanics Help
- Physics Question
- Forces a levels
- AS Level Mechanics Question
- M1 - Help thread
- M1 question - help pls :$
- A-LEVEL Maths Mechanics HARD Question!
- urgent mechanics question!
- AS Mechanics
- Physics - Moments Question
- Mechanics 1 - Vertical motion - I just don't get it
- pulley
- Help mechanics
- Mechanics 1
- a level physics
- Physics question help (moments)
- Further mechanics
- Objects in contact- find normal reaction force between basket and box
- velocity speed and force

- Official: University of Worcester A101 2024 Entry
- Plymouth Dentistry 2024 Entry
- Official: St George's, University of London A100 2024 Entry
- Official Dental Hygiene and Therapy (Oral Health Science) 2024 Entry Thread
- Official: Anglia Ruskin University A100 2024 Entry
- Official Oxford 2024 Postgraduate Applicants Thread
- UCL pharmacy 2024 entry
- MPhil Advanced Computer Science Cambridge - 2024 Entry
- New uni wants old uni reference
- HKU / CUHK Medicine non-jupas 2024
- Official: King's College London A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- Santander Graduate Scheme 2024
- Costume/ Fashion course unis
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- Network Rail Graduate 2024
- Northumbria 2024 offer
- MPhil Politics and International Studies 2024
- Probability distribution
- Official: University of Exeter A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- University of bedfordshire, Bedford campus

- LSE International Social and Public Policy 2024-2024 (ISPP)
- Mst in English (all streams)
- My question is about my sociology project?
- SIP civil service 2024 thread
- Oxford 2024 DPhils (Law & Socio-legal)/BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPhil/MLF Applicants
- home schooling
- MPhil/DPhil Law and Socio Legal Research- 2024
- Lloyds Banking Group 2024 Graduate Scheme
- University of Leeds
- Official Thread: Graduate Entry Medicine 2024 Entry
- Amazon Apprenticeships 2024
- MPhil in Machine Learning and Machine Intelligence at Cambridge 2024
- epq sources for a artifact
- NINE DTP Applicants 24/25
- Bristol engineering mathematics vs Souhtampton Math & CS
- Get into Teaching Adviser Service
- 2024 Pharmacy applicants mega-thread
- Get into Teaching Adviser Service
- Get into Teaching Adviser Service
- DWP Work Coach Interview - how long to hear

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023