Hi
@Lilly2510,
I can only speak from my own experience - and from a UK HE context - but certain elements of this seem highly unusual to me.
Whilst it certainly isn't unusual for additional support to be offered to students for whom English is not their first language, this is usually offered through a university's academic support services and via professionally trained support staff. At Keele, for example, our Language Centre provides individual and group language and academic skills guidance for international students at all levels (
https://www.keele.ac.uk/study/languagecentre/academicenglish/) in addition to offering Pre-Sessional English courses (
https://www.keele.ac.uk/study/languagecentre/pre-sessional/).
At Keele we also offer native English speakers support with their Academic English and Study skills. For example, we have a service called Write Direction (
https://www.keele.ac.uk/kiite/workingwithstudents/academicskills/writedirection/) that offers one-to-one academic coaching to assist students in developing their academic practice and skills, in addition to guides to help students with note taking, academic reading, how to research, plan and write assignments etc. Plus there's additional support available for students with Dyslexia and other disabilities (
https://www.keele.ac.uk/students/lifeoutsideofstudy/disabilityanddyslexiasupport/).
Whilst peer-to-peer support (from trained peer supporters) is sometimes made available as part of a wider student support package, I'm very surprised that there is direct pressure being placed on you to proof-read the work of non-native speaking students. Proof-reading and Academic Skills support are both very specialist areas of work. regardless of who that support is being offered to. In addition, there's absolutely no guarantee that a native-speaking student possesses better academic English skills - I've seen plenty of terrible spelling and grammar from native English speakers! Plus, in most institutions, this practice could place students at risk of committing inadvertent academic misconduct.
You don't mention in your post who has told you that you need to offer this support. Given what you have said, I think it's worth clarifying exactly what you're being expected to do with the module lead as it's possible that the usual level of peer-support you get on any course has been miscommunicated, or that their instructions have been misinterpreted. If you don't feel comfortable or confident approaching them directly to raise this, do so through your course rep, your student's union reps, and/or your personal tutor/advisor.
Hope that helps and good luck with the rest of your course!
Amy Louise
PhD Candidate & Student Ambassador, Keele University.