This discussion is no longer active so you won't be able to reply.Check out other Related discussions

PS: Specifically talking about CIE, because that is the board I'm familiar with.

I've always been in favor of requiring A Level Math be taken alongside A Level Physics if someone wants to do A Level Physics.

From a practical standpoint, its completely logical. No major university will have a physics prerequisite standalone without a math prerequisite along with it.

From a content-wise standpoint, it also makes a lot more sense. Algebra-based physics is so much more unintuitive than Calculus-based physics. And I think students are worse off when they have to memorize equations or derive them non-elegantly without intuition.

Take the equations of motion for example. From an algebraic standpoint, they seem quite archaic and quite difficult to derive. With calculus though, its just a matter of integration and the ideas become intuitive. E.g. 1st derv of position is speed, 2nd derv of position is velocity, integral of force is work.

Not to mention, the breadth and depth of the content can be explored much further if Calculus is a mandatory requirement. University physics is calculus based anyways so the transition will feel more natural.

Forcing A Level Physics to bend down to the level of GCSE Maths is limiting its potential as a subject.

Thoughts?

I've always been in favor of requiring A Level Math be taken alongside A Level Physics if someone wants to do A Level Physics.

From a practical standpoint, its completely logical. No major university will have a physics prerequisite standalone without a math prerequisite along with it.

From a content-wise standpoint, it also makes a lot more sense. Algebra-based physics is so much more unintuitive than Calculus-based physics. And I think students are worse off when they have to memorize equations or derive them non-elegantly without intuition.

Take the equations of motion for example. From an algebraic standpoint, they seem quite archaic and quite difficult to derive. With calculus though, its just a matter of integration and the ideas become intuitive. E.g. 1st derv of position is speed, 2nd derv of position is velocity, integral of force is work.

Not to mention, the breadth and depth of the content can be explored much further if Calculus is a mandatory requirement. University physics is calculus based anyways so the transition will feel more natural.

Forcing A Level Physics to bend down to the level of GCSE Maths is limiting its potential as a subject.

Thoughts?

(edited 11 months ago)

Scroll to see replies

No.it should not be mandatory.as a brit you should have more liberal mentality

Original post by Preznri

No.it should not be mandatory.as a brit you should have more liberal mentality

I'm not a Brit haha, that's why I said CIE.

(Original post by Zacky VT)I'm not a Brit haha, that's why I said CIE.

No you are brit.i know all about you.you live in nottingham with your 6 wives.

No you are brit.i know all about you.you live in nottingham with your 6 wives.

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by the bear

Physics should be made accessible to non-STEM children. it is just outdated elitism to exclude our amazing kids from this subject just because they are not spods.

You are right bro.he is a polygamist.so he still has a outdated mentality

Original post by Zacky VT

PS: Specifically talking about CIE, because that is the board I'm familiar with.

I've always been in favor of requiring A Level Math be taken alongside A Level Physics if someone wants to do A Level Physics.

From a practical standpoint, its completely logical. No major university will have a physics prerequisite standalone without a math prerequisite along with it.

From a content-wise standpoint, it also makes a lot more sense. Algebra-based physics is so much more unintuitive than Calculus-based physics. And I think students are worse off when they have to memorize equations or derive them non-elegantly without intuition.

Take the equations of motion for example. From an algebraic standpoint, they seem quite archaic and quite difficult to derive. With calculus though, its just a matter of integration and the ideas become intuitive. E.g. 1st derv of position is speed, 2nd derv of position is velocity, integral of force is work.

Not to mention, the breadth and depth of the content can be explored much further if Calculus is a mandatory requirement. University physics is calculus based anyways so the transition will feel more natural.

Forcing A Level Physics to bend down to the level of GCSE Maths is limiting its potential as a subject.

Thoughts?

I've always been in favor of requiring A Level Math be taken alongside A Level Physics if someone wants to do A Level Physics.

From a practical standpoint, its completely logical. No major university will have a physics prerequisite standalone without a math prerequisite along with it.

From a content-wise standpoint, it also makes a lot more sense. Algebra-based physics is so much more unintuitive than Calculus-based physics. And I think students are worse off when they have to memorize equations or derive them non-elegantly without intuition.

Take the equations of motion for example. From an algebraic standpoint, they seem quite archaic and quite difficult to derive. With calculus though, its just a matter of integration and the ideas become intuitive. E.g. 1st derv of position is speed, 2nd derv of position is velocity, integral of force is work.

Not to mention, the breadth and depth of the content can be explored much further if Calculus is a mandatory requirement. University physics is calculus based anyways so the transition will feel more natural.

Forcing A Level Physics to bend down to the level of GCSE Maths is limiting its potential as a subject.

Thoughts?

There are some students who simply take A-Level Physics to fill in as a 3rd/4th subject for A-level, and don't want to continue with physics.

Maybe we should split the A-level physics into two A-Levels.

A-level General Physics: Algebra-based, baasically the A-level Physics syllabus as it's now. Comparable to AP Physics 1 and 2 (algebra-based physics).

A-Level Further Physics: Calculus-based, designed to be an expansion on A-level Physics. More than AP Physics M and EM, but for other areas, calculus-based. Maybe some other areas. This would require A-level Math to already be taken.

This way, the physics enthusiasts who want to study it for university can study more physics, while the other students who only like it a bit, or just want to fill the 3rd A-level, can keep it at General Physics level.

The problem is GCSE doesn't have any calculus (except IGCSE) for regular Maths, there only starts to be calculus in Add Math. Which means the curriculum before would need to be changed, maybe including some calculus.

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by username6103176

No.it should not be mandatory.as a brit you should have more liberal mentality

I disagree, the A-level physics course has been watered down significantly by no calculus

Original post by the bear

Physics should be made accessible to non-STEM children. it is just outdated elitism to exclude our amazing kids from this subject just because they are not spods.

We could simply introduce a new qualification for those STEM nerds who want to continue physics further: A-level Further Physics. Essentially a calculus-based version of A-level Physics

Original post by justlearning1469

I disagree, the A-level physics course has been watered down significantly by no calculus

We could simply introduce a new qualification for those STEM nerds who want to continue physics further: A-level Further Physics. Essentially a math-based version of A-level Physics

We could simply introduce a new qualification for those STEM nerds who want to continue physics further: A-level Further Physics. Essentially a math-based version of A-level Physics

ftfy

Original post by the bear

ftfy

Nah.

There better be an equivalent to AP Physics C

I do Edexcel A level maths and OCR A a level Physics and was told I need to do both, however disagree.

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

Original post by JeromeValeska:)

I do Edexcel A level maths and OCR A a level Physics and was told I need to do both, however disagree.

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

I think we are in a bit of a confusion. I'm not saying A Level Maths is needed for the current A Level Physics Syllabus.

I'm saying the A Level Physics syllabus should be changed to be calculus-based, such that maths would be a prerequisite. This makes it so that the subject can go deeper (similar to AP Physics C in the US system).

I do like @justlearning1469 proposal though, where there would be a physics and further physics.

Original post by justlearning1469

Nah.

There better be an equivalent to AP Physics C

There better be an equivalent to AP Physics C

Completely agreed!

The UK excels a lot in terms of pre-university education compared to the US. UK students enter university with a lot more background knowledge than US students do, and this applies to almost all fields of study... but I think in some ways, American pre-u education does better in physics than the UKs system.

The fact that the college board has a calculus-based physics course that American juniors & seniors are able to take gives them a big edge in university level physics. For example, the AP Physics C Mechanics & Electromagnetism courses can be used as full credit for an entire physics course in some American universities. In the UK, this is impossible though, since our pre-university physics qualifications aren't calculus based.

All university level physics is Calculus-based, so I don't see the point in "double-learning" physics in algebraic style and calculus style later on.

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by JeromeValeska:)

I do Edexcel A level maths and OCR A a level Physics and was told I need to do both, however disagree.

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

Firstly - The mechanics in maths A level is way harder and there is alot more of it than in physics

Secondly - Yes knowledge of logs is needed for some parts of Physics A level but maybe a few hours practise and youtube help + help from teacher and you should be fine (it's quite straight forward)

Thirdly - although maths makes up 40% of A level Physics, you get given all the formula and mathmetical manipulation is needed, but nothing more than GCSE (except for log ofc)

Finally - A level maths is mainly Pure (which is just graphs and algebra, trig, differentiation, intergration etc ...) which is a huge waste of time if you are not pasionate about the subject, and may I add very time consuming and difficult initially)

so no Maths rly isn't needed for A level Physics (most boards I would say)

It isn't that difficult as long as you practice and have a solid foundation.

Original post by Zacky VT

I think we are in a bit of a confusion. I'm not saying A Level Maths is needed for the current A Level Physics Syllabus.

I'm saying the A Level Physics syllabus should be changed to be calculus-based, such that maths would be a prerequisite. This makes it so that the subject can go deeper (similar to AP Physics C in the US system).

I do like @justlearning1469 proposal though, where there would be a physics and further physics.

I'm saying the A Level Physics syllabus should be changed to be calculus-based, such that maths would be a prerequisite. This makes it so that the subject can go deeper (similar to AP Physics C in the US system).

I do like @justlearning1469 proposal though, where there would be a physics and further physics.

Thank you for making it clear.

I prefer this proposal because there are some students who just want to take A-level Physics to fill in the 3rd A-level, not go further in science/applied math/engineering/CS/economics.

For Further Physics it could be the same topics as the General Physics, but perhaps with calculus and more rigorous (think maybe intro uni level and a bit of competition physics).

Original post by Zacky VT

Completely agreed!

The UK excels a lot in terms of pre-university education compared to the US. UK students enter university with a lot more background knowledge than US students do, and this applies to almost all fields of study... but I think in some ways, American pre-u education does better in physics than the UKs system.

The fact that the college board has a calculus-based physics course that American juniors & seniors are able to take gives them a big edge in university level physics. For example, the AP Physics C Mechanics & Electromagnetism courses can be used as full credit for an entire physics course in some American universities. In the UK, this is impossible though, since our pre-university physics qualifications aren't calculus based.

All university level physics is Calculus-based, so I don't see the point in "double-learning" physics in algebraic style and calculus style later on.

The UK excels a lot in terms of pre-university education compared to the US. UK students enter university with a lot more background knowledge than US students do, and this applies to almost all fields of study... but I think in some ways, American pre-u education does better in physics than the UKs system.

The fact that the college board has a calculus-based physics course that American juniors & seniors are able to take gives them a big edge in university level physics. For example, the AP Physics C Mechanics & Electromagnetism courses can be used as full credit for an entire physics course in some American universities. In the UK, this is impossible though, since our pre-university physics qualifications aren't calculus based.

All university level physics is Calculus-based, so I don't see the point in "double-learning" physics in algebraic style and calculus style later on.

AP is usually less rigorous and shallower than A-level, which is why UK students need 3 A-levels while US students need 3-5 AP. Not just more background knowledge, but more rigorous.

Even if the physics-based pre-uni qualification is calculus-based, there isn't much of "skipping" courses you can do in UK. How much do you plan to cover in this "Further Physics" qualification?

If it matches closely enough with a physics course in first term of university, there could be two paths at most universities, for physics degree:

1. Students without Further Physics

They will take Calculus-based physics courses to replace Further Physics.

2. Students with Further Physics

They could have the option to skip a calculus-based physics course in university. In exchange they need to fill the credits skipped with other electives/physics courses. I don't think there'd be enough credits to graduate early.

Alternatively, they could decide to not skip the calculus-based physics course in university and do some revision (especially if they didn't get A/A* in that course)

Another alternative is having a lighter first year to have more time to settle into university, work on hobbies etc.

There may be some universities which would require Further Physics. In that case need Further Physics.

However, there's a large shortage of math/physics teachers in the UK. Which may mean this plan is not practically possible. In that case for elite universities they could have summer bridging courses of Further Physics, much like in Oxford, for mathematics, they have summer bridging work for those who didn't take FM.

Jumping directly into calculus-based physics, from GCSE physics, is very tough. To understand the mathematics as well as the concepts at the same time may be too demanding.

It might be better for them to understand physics at a general level first (conceptually) then use the concepts and mathematics learnt from A-level to apply to Further Physics. That way they can secure a better foundation and not rush things as much.

Plus, the extra practice may be useful for a lot of students to further solidify their foundation.

What do you think, @Zacky VT

(edited 11 months ago)

Maybe we could have Further Physics like how there's Futher Maths but I have no idea.

Yeah maybe for Computer Science, Physics and BTEC engineering you should be expected to have A-level Maths knowledge (I didn't do A-level Maths though) but I can see how that can cause issues.

Original post by Talkative Toad

Maybe we could have Further Physics like how there's Futher Maths but I have no idea.

Keep the Physics A-level

Further Physics would be Physics A-level but calculus-based, and require A-level Math. Maybe concurrently taking FM but that could be a nightmare for teachers to handle.

There is already AP Physics C, Mechanics and EM, in America. We can base off that.

Original post by Talkative Toad

Yeah maybe for Computer Science, Physics and BTEC engineering you should be expected to have A-level Maths knowledge (I didn't do A-level Maths though) but I can see how that can cause issues.

Some students take Physics to fill in the 3rd A-level, not because they want to study further.

Maybe there should be Further Computer Science, Further BTEC Engineering etc. but that's a topic for another day.

@Talkative Toad Do you wish to talk about it? I can make a thread abou it

Original post by justlearning1469

Keep the Physics A-level

Further Physics would be Physics A-level but calculus-based, and require A-level Math. Maybe concurrently taking FM but that could be a nightmare for teachers to handle.

There is already AP Physics C, Mechanics and EM, in America. We can base off that.

Some students take Physics to fill in the 3rd A-level, not because they want to study further.

Maybe there should be Further Computer Science, Further BTEC Engineering etc. but that's a topic for another day.

@Talkative Toad Do you wish to talk about it? I can make a thread abou it

Further Physics would be Physics A-level but calculus-based, and require A-level Math. Maybe concurrently taking FM but that could be a nightmare for teachers to handle.

There is already AP Physics C, Mechanics and EM, in America. We can base off that.

Some students take Physics to fill in the 3rd A-level, not because they want to study further.

Maybe there should be Further Computer Science, Further BTEC Engineering etc. but that's a topic for another day.

@Talkative Toad Do you wish to talk about it? I can make a thread abou it

I don't think that there should be Further Computer Science or Further Engineering. Maybe Further A-level physics only as not everyone who wants/needs to take physics wants to take maths.

I.e making physics more calculus based might have a negative impact on pupils who want do A-level physics but not A-level Maths

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by Talkative Toad

I don't think that there should be Further Computer Science or Further Engineering. Maybe Further A-level physics only as not everyone who wants/needs to take physics wants to take maths.

I see, but what should be in Further A-level physics?

Original post by justlearning1469

I see, but what should be in Further A-level physics?

The stuff you've mentioned i.e it's more Calculus based.

- What gcse's would i need for cs
- A level choice help. (Economics vs chemistry) for engineering
- Do I need Further Maths for Cambridge Natural Sciences (physics route)?
- a level options
- What units do I need for Edexcel IAL or IAS Further Maths
- A level subject selection
- Help choosing subjects
- Physics Optional Module
- St Andrews - 3 subjects in first/second year?
- computer science degree without maths
- What A levels will prepare me?
- Help me choose the best combo for a levels?
- Birmingham vs Bristol, Manchester, UCL, or KCL for Computer Science
- Can I do electrical engineering with only A Level Physics?
- what a-levels are needed for a computer science degree ?
- Requirements for Psychology
- Civil Engineering at Uni of Leeds, do I need Physics or not?
- A level choices - how to pick with 2 different career paths
- Do my A level options fit my future goals?
- What university has the lowest GCSE requirements for medicine?

- Breakfast items hurt/heal game!
- CTAM: Count to a million (Part 79)
- Jp Morgan work experience 2024
- Girlfriend is going Ibiza, and I'm worried!!!!!
- Career advice
- [Official thread] Durham University 2024 Applicants
- I got all 8s and 9s at GCSE AMA
- Vodafone Cyber Security Degree Apprenticeship 2024
- I got A*AA for my A-Levels - ask me anything.
- TSR opinion poll, Feb 2024: how would you vote in the general election?
- Official Uni of Bath Applicants 2024 Entry Thread
- School won’t enter student for UKMT maths challenge
- LNAT results 2024 for UCL
- Favourite anime of all time - remove 4 and add 4 from the last poster
- 2024 UK general election speculation and build-up thread
- Official: King's College London A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- Imperial CS Interview on the 28th Feb
- lnat results thread 2024
- Microsoft apprenticeship 2024
- Haven’t heard from UCL at all, should i be concerned?

- Official Northumbria University Applicant Thread for 2024
- Realistically how hard to become an accountant without a degree and just the AAT lvl?
- Finance degree apprentiship.. at salford uni
- 2024 entry A100 / A101 Medicine fastest and slowest offer senders
- Mr Bates v the post office
- UCL pharmacy 2024 entry
- Chrisiscrisis
- Sustainable Built Environment, Energy, Resources Bsc/MEng
- Sussex foundation year interview
- UCL Contextual offers
- Sutton Trust US programme
- New Thread Experience Feedback - Official Thread
- Which psychology path is best for me?
- [Official] 2024 US elections megathread
- Glasgow LNAT Score 2024
- Dwp work coach EO December campaign
- The Arsenal Thread XXVI
- 2024 UK Drama School Auditions
- ੈ✩‧₊ year 13 academic comeback
- Super-curriculars

- has anyone made a big academic comeback in a levels ? year 13
- 4 A-Levels and an EPQ
- I'm failing my a levels and don't know what to do
- Making an academic comeback
- A*A* in maths + further maths A level - ask me anything
- From B/C/D to AAA in 5 months?
- Edexcel IAL biology unit 1 Jan 2024
- Aqa a level biology student made unofficial mark scheme 2023
- Edexcel IAL Maths P1 Jan 2024
- Edexcel A Level Music Paper: Appraising (9MU0/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]

- has anyone made a big academic comeback in a levels ? year 13
- 4 A-Levels and an EPQ
- I'm failing my a levels and don't know what to do
- Making an academic comeback
- A*A* in maths + further maths A level - ask me anything
- From B/C/D to AAA in 5 months?
- Edexcel IAL biology unit 1 Jan 2024
- Aqa a level biology student made unofficial mark scheme 2023
- Edexcel IAL Maths P1 Jan 2024
- Edexcel A Level Music Paper: Appraising (9MU0/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]