The Student Room Group

AQA A Level Psychology Paper 2 (7182/2) - 22nd May 2024 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 980
Original post by dowchbag
ehh. ig. its a chemical and its in the brain. but safer to put neurotransmitters.


most neurotransmitters are hormones tho??? what examples are you thinking of
Reply 981
Original post by krumel21
most neurotransmitters are hormones tho??? what examples are you thinking of

some hormones are neurotransmitters, some are not. all neurotransmitters are neurochemicals. thus safer to put a neurotransmitter.
Original post by predestination
What did people put for the benefit of the interview

I put that it builds rapport so the parent will feel more comfortable to give more detailed and valid information, and that the interviewer can ask followup questions on interesting points if it is a semistructured or non-structured interview
Original post by saskiahdltea
hm. i dont think you messed up per se, more that perhaps your answer won't be considered to be answering the question enough/fully, but the evaluation points are correct, again it will be about how you've worded it and linked it to the question. to me, this could still work as an answer

Really? 😭 omg ok thank you
Guys I wrote secondary data am I done for
Original post by Mariamsfjf
Guys I wrote secondary data am I done for

same my bro... i said it was because the researcher collected diary entries from the pariitcpants which i thought was seocndary data ffs
Reply 987
Original post by dowchbag
some hormones are neurotransmitters, some are not. all neurotransmitters are neurochemicals. thus safer to put a neurotransmitter.


ur just fear mongering lmao
Original post by dowchbag
yumyum mama is getting a B

lol :biggrin:!
Original post by Mariamsfjf
Guys I wrote secondary data am I done for

not done for, it wasn't worth many marks, but it was primary data!
Original post by ghaloasjmnasj
i'm just scared i didn't give enough for the 8 markers. people put so much evaluation points but at most i usually just put 2 plus my application was slacking a little bit, even for paper 1. and my points for the 8 marker on approaches were lacking in elaboration (well the second comparison i made i literally gave up bcos i ran out of time bcos of anxiety fml fml fml)


Well, if it makes you feel any better I did one comparison for the 8 marker in approaches 😭 I’m sure you’re fine!
Original post by gturner301
Well, if it makes you feel any better I did one comparison for the 8 marker in approaches 😭 I’m sure you’re fine!


It’s also about the quality of the evaluation, not how many points you make. If you did one really good comparison with detail, that’s better than say someone who did 2 but didn’t really elaborate on it
Original post by gturner301
It’s also about the quality of the evaluation, not how many points you make. If you did one really good comparison with detail, that’s better than say someone who did 2 but didn’t really elaborate on it

i elaborated a lot on mine so i hope so!
Reply 993
Guys, don't worry about grade boundaries. They're not going to be ridiculously different to the 2019 ones, at maximum its four or five marks. There was such a big jump from 2022 to 2023, because they were returning to precovid grade boundaries, and grade proportions. Don't worry, you'll all do well
Original post by strean
Guys, don't worry about grade boundaries. They're not going to be ridiculously different to the 2019 ones, at maximum its four or five marks. There was such a big jump from 2022 to 2023, because they were returning to precovid grade boundaries, and grade proportions. Don't worry, you'll all do well

i'm terrified idk everyone i've spoken to keeps saying that it was ridiculously easy?? even those who get lower grades?? that's why i'm so confused and scared
Reply 995
Original post by ghaloasjmnasj
i'm terrified idk everyone i've spoken to keeps saying that it was ridiculously easy?? even those who get lower grades?? that's why i'm so confused and scared

ideas of easy are subjective. i was concerned when everyone was saying it's amazing, because my idea of amazing is 90s and above, but for other people, amazing or easy might be 50 or above. its subjective.
Reply 996
Original post by anonymous.Mono
same my bro... i said it was because the researcher collected diary entries from the pariitcpants which i thought was seocndary data ffs

what‘s the whole the question?
Reply 997
Original post by strean
Guys, don't worry about grade boundaries. They're not going to be ridiculously different to the 2019 ones, at maximum its four or five marks. There was such a big jump from 2022 to 2023, because they were returning to precovid grade boundaries, and grade proportions. Don't worry, you'll all do well

so do you mean its going to be like the 2019 ones?
Reply 998
Original post by ly2021
so do you mean its going to be like the 2019 ones?

around that range.
Original post by strean
around that range.

what makes you think that?

Quick Reply