This discussion is closed.
saturn
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 14 years ago
#1
which height would you prefere or like best in the opposite sex? theres not enough room to list every foot so its gonna be brief...
0
technik
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#2
Report 14 years ago
#2
shorter than me
0
Muse
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#3
Report 14 years ago
#3
Shorter than me. I'm 6'2".
0
Toy Soldier
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#4
Report 14 years ago
#4
How does this poll in any way work? You should really have had "male" options and "femal" options for a decent poll. Oh well.

I'm male, 6'2, and generally like girls to be in the 5'5 - 5'9 bracket. Though it's not exclusive.
0
Muse
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#5
Report 14 years ago
#5
If she's not 5' 9.5", i'm not interested.
0
Sparkey
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#6
Report 14 years ago
#6
Male - Taller than me, don;t care by how much as long as he's taller
0
Toy Soldier
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#7
Report 14 years ago
#7
(Original post by timeofyourlife)
If she's not 5' 9.5", i'm not interested.
Ewww, nasty. I'd much prefer 5'9.473". Anything else is just out of proportion.
0
randdom
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report 14 years ago
#8
It doesn't really bother me but my bf is 6ft 4 so I went with the talled option.
0
Makavelli_07
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#9
Report 14 years ago
#9
If i found a girl taller then me i'd be a little disturbed.

So, definately shorter then me. I'm not fussy, so pretty much any height.
0
Muse
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#10
Report 14 years ago
#10
(Original post by Toy Soldier)
Ewww, nasty. I'd much prefer 5'9.473". Anything else is just out of proportion.
.473?? controversial. i'm not sure i could cope with the stigma attached to such a socially unacceptable height.
0
Makavelli_07
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#11
Report 14 years ago
#11
(Original post by timeofyourlife)
.473?? controversial. i'm not sure i could cope with the stigma attached to such a socially unacceptable height.
Understandable. I wouldn't be able to deal with all the controversy either. :rolleyes:
0
idiopathic
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#12
Report 14 years ago
#12
(Original post by Toy Soldier)
Ewww, nasty. I'd much prefer 5'9.473". Anything else is just out of proportion.
I prefer 2pi to be honest
0
frost105
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#13
Report 14 years ago
#13
To be honest I dont usually get my measuring tape out and go 5 10 perfect I may now date you :p:
0
Toy Soldier
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#14
Report 14 years ago
#14
(Original post by timeofyourlife)
.473?? controversial. i'm not sure i could cope with the stigma attached to such a socially unacceptable height.
It's to controversy that gets me going. Why would you want a patheticly heighted girl conforming to social height acceptance? No no, .473's all the way. And it has to be a digital measurement. Shoeless, and non inclusive of big hair.
0
Muse
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#15
Report 14 years ago
#15
(Original post by Toy Soldier)
It's to controversy that gets me going. Why would you want a patheticly heighted girl conforming to social height acceptance? No no, .473's all the way. And it has to be a digital measurement. Shoeless, and non inclusive of big hair.
I prefer to stick to the traditional divisable-by-pi measurements. They tend to be the ones that last longer. Must be the years of circular abuse that drill respect into them.
0
Toy Soldier
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#16
Report 14 years ago
#16
(Original post by timeofyourlife)
I prefer to stick to the traditional divisable-by-pi measurements.
Really? I like to estimate all girls I see using a complex formula involving height, weight and certain body shapes. I use the result as a constant to compare against different personality traits. The girl must have a result of between 6.273 and 9.148 to even get a second look.
0
Muse
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#17
Report 14 years ago
#17
(Original post by Toy Soldier)
Really? I like to estimate all girls I see using a complex formula involving height, weight and certain body shapes. I use the result as a constant to compare against different personality traits. The girl must have a result of between 6.273 and 9.148 to even get a second look.
The only problem is that those numbers can become skewed after the consumption of ethanol containing beverages. I once mistook a 3.432 for a 7.345 :eek:
0
Jump
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#18
Report 14 years ago
#18
smaller than me but not a dwarf
0
dazmanultra
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#19
Report 14 years ago
#19
As a man, I'd like a girl I go out with to be slightly shorter than me... although i am a short guy @ 5'7".
0
Toy Soldier
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#20
Report 14 years ago
#20
(Original post by timeofyourlife)
3.432 for a 7.345 :eek:
Really??!? And you're still alive? Under the influence I once made a bad nipple diameter calculation and woke up next to a 6.2724 that I'd mistaken for a 6.2726 and rounded up. I had to kept away from sharp objects for a month!
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you made up your mind on your five uni choices?

Yes I know where I'm applying (56)
66.67%
No I haven't decided yet (18)
21.43%
Yes but I might change my mind (10)
11.9%

Watched Threads

View All