The Student Room Group

AQA A-level Physics Paper 2 (7408/2) - 6th June 2024 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 780

Original post
by Marn2219133
i put 0.125 will i lose a mark


In the unofficial mark scheme, it doesn't say anything about that. Ig it depends on the examiner ig

Reply 781

also can some1 explain why 121k was wrong for the bottom question on the first page

Reply 782

These people saying they found it "relatively easy" or "better than last year" are completely lying. My friend who always gets full marks or almost full marks in physics and maths Olympiads and supercurricular activities, AND always gets the highest test scores IN THE WHOLE SCHOOL said it was a terrible paper. So please stop trolling and get a life.

Reply 783

Original post
by Marn2219133
also can some1 explain why 121k was wrong for the bottom question on the first page


The crms had to double, T is proportional to (crms)² so T had to multiply by 4 so u had to convert to kelvin, multiply by 4 and subtract the original temperature to get the change in temp. This comes out to 879K i think. Perhaps you accidentally used celsius instead?

Reply 784

Original post
by B.G_
The crms had to double, T is proportional to (crms)² so T had to multiply by 4 so u had to convert to kelvin, multiply by 4 and subtract the original temperature to get the change in temp. This comes out to 879K i think. Perhaps you accidentally used celsius instead?


i see thanks

Reply 785

Also no one can be saying that people on here "didn't work hard enough" because this is TSR not the backyard dumps and everyone here goes above and beyond. You aren't fooling anyone by trolling and being idiots

Reply 786

did u lot get R/2 for one of the MCQ questions

Reply 787

Original post
by SZ.055
did u lot get R/2 for one of the MCQ questions


Yea I did

Reply 788

what was the answer for the MCQ where it asked for the definition of epsilome nought.

Reply 789

Original post
by SZ.055
what was the answer for the MCQ where it asked for the definition of epsilome nought.


It was the capacitance when 1m apart with 1m² area or smth like that. B

Reply 790

Original post
by B.G_
It was the capacitance when 1m apart with 1m² area or smth like that. B

calm. got that

Reply 791

Original post
by SZ.055
calm. got that


Yea I th8nk a few put A as well because it was like permeation in a vacuum or smth which is not the same as the permitivity of free space

Reply 792

Original post
by B.G_
Same it was equal to C2/C1,

might be the only thing I got correct aside from question 1 (first 3 parts) and the definition for electric potential

Reply 793

What eMF did u guys get for the rod? I got 1.1mV

Reply 794

Original post
by SidDaKid_1906
might be the only thing I got correct aside from question 1 (first 3 parts) and the definition for electric potential

what was the definition exactly cos I don't get how it was 3 marks

Reply 795

Original post
by Talkative Toad
This.
It’s like GCSE Maths where you can get approximately 60-70% of the questions wrong in the higher tier papers but still get a “strong pass” (Grade 5).
Passing whilst not knowing at least half of the content? That doesn’t sound right or logical to me despite the bell curve.
Top grade (Grade 7/A and above) when you only know just over half of the content (as in you get around half of the marks)? Doesn’t look good to me either, could be argued as worse.
absolutely, plus if the huge majority of students who sat the paper are capped at around the same marks, i’m guessing between 40-50 going off what everyone else here is saying, it’s going to be so difficult to distinguish what number of marks should be an A, B, C etc and the number of marks between achieving the grades will be tiny. meaning that A/A* students with mental health conditions who struggle in exam conditions (such as myself, i get bad anxiety and i find myself making more silly errors because of the stress) will be at a huge disadvantage even though they’re more than capable of achieving the higher grades. doesn’t sound particularly accessible like AQA claim to be

Reply 796

Original post
by aerazhgbrsfgb
Can't wait for the downfall of AQA. After 2023 and now this, I guarantee there'll be a massive drop in schools using them, no wonder considering the border-line bullying of the papers, intentionally making even the smartest students feel bad about themselves and ruining their uni offers. Almost every person I know who does physics and can afford it has needed a therapist. They are literally destroying generations of people, just for the fun of it. I will cry tears of joy on the day they go bankrupt from crimes like this.

+1

Reply 797

Original post
by Talkative Toad
+1


I’ve reported them to OFQUAL and I suggest others do too

Reply 798

Original post
by SZ.055
what was the definition exactly cos I don't get how it was 3 marks


I put that the charge that created the field was negative because it was negative potential

Reply 799

Original post
by its.scphie
absolutely, plus if the huge majority of students who sat the paper are capped at around the same marks, i’m guessing between 40-50 going off what everyone else here is saying, it’s going to be so difficult to distinguish what number of marks should be an A, B, C etc and the number of marks between achieving the grades will be tiny. meaning that A/A* students with mental health conditions who struggle in exam conditions (such as myself, i get bad anxiety and i find myself making more silly errors because of the stress) will be at a huge disadvantage even though they’re more than capable of achieving the higher grades. doesn’t sound particularly accessible like AQA claim to be
This is such a good point, especially about the lower differences in grade boundaries- I’m dyslexic and I can distinctly notice my reading comprehension and ability to process questions decrease when I’m stressed and panicking, so no matter how much I’d revised for the exam it felt like it was all out the window straight away anyways.
Usually I’m at the top end of my class but I think that I likely did much worse in comparison to other students this time, just because of the state I was in during this paper and the massive amount of errors that I’m sure it caused me to make- no amount out of extra time could make up for the loss of marks from how much harder it was to get through reading the questions and trying to formulate coherent worded answers whilst panicking on that test lol.
(edited 1 year ago)

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.