The Student Room Group

Can someone help me with marking? GCSE AQA English Literature

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20

would anyone be able to mark a macbeth essay for me? Here is my essay: 20.04.23.docx
(ignore the date, i accidently did 23 instead of 24)

Thanks

Reply 21

Original post by johnedwards12312
would anyone be able to mark a macbeth essay for me? Here is my essay: 20.04.23.docx
(ignore the date, i accidently did 23 instead of 24)
Thanks

Hey could you post it on this thread by copy and pasting it pls

Reply 22

sure, here is the question with pictures attached:

Screenshot 2024-04-21 085054.png
Screenshot 2024-04-21 085110.png
DONE IN EXAM CONDITIONS 46 MINUTES completed
MH - yr10
In the archetypal play ‘Macbeth’, Lady Macbeth is portrayed as a pivotal standpoint, changing from an ‘innocent flower’ to a ‘fiend-like queen’, depicting the impact of her thirst for power, eventually leading to the heinous crime of regicide. Shakespeare portrays her pivot from the typical woman to an abhorred, resented outcast and misalignment from society to portray the impact of one’s ‘vaulting ambition’ and to condemn women who step out of their role in society.

Shakespeare initially portrays Lady Macbeth as a typical woman at the start of the play, similar to any other housewife in the Jacobean era. Lady Macbeth is portrayed as Macbeth's 'dearest love’, where the term ‘dearest' serves to convey Macbeth's love and affection for her. The superlative depicts Macbeth's love for her, typical in a common Jacobean relationship. However, Shakespeare may also portray their relationship as unnatural and atypical to a common relationship at the time through Shakespeare employing Lady Macbeth as Macbeth's ‘partner in greatness'. The term partner symbolises Lady Macbeth’s equality to Macbeth in the relationship, as women were seen as below men in the Jacobean hierarchy, also known as the Great Chain of being. This deploys Lady Macbeth as straying away from her natural order, and this ultimately leads her to become a catalyst of Macbeth’s heinous crime regicide. Thus, Shakespeare may perhaps condemn women who step out of their natural role in society. Shakespeare portrays their relationship to become slightly unnatural to deploy the idea that disobeying God’s will and the Great Chain of Being can cause drastic consequences, as exemplified through Lady Macbeth and Macbeth, who traded away their ‘eternal jewel’, thus warning the audience of defying God. Shakespeare initially portrays Lady Macbeth as a typical housewife, but may perhaps portray her as slightly misaligning to a typical wife to foreshadow her resentful deed regicide.

Shakespeare uses the regicide of king Duncan as a pivot to induce Lady Macbeth’s transformation from an ‘innocent flower’ to a Machiavellian, deceitful woman. Shakespeare employs Lady Macbeth as authoritative and similar to the supernatural, as she is portrayed to welcome Duncan to ‘my battlements’. The term ‘my’ symbolises a sense of authority, overshadowing Macbeth in the relationship. This shocks a Jacobean audience, as women were rarely seen as equal to their partners, let alone hold authority above them. This portrays Lady Macbeth as a changing character, pushed by her thirst for ambition. Lady Macbeth is also seen as similar to the three witches. She uses the metaphysical aid, where she asks the ‘dire spirits’ to ‘unsex her here’ and fill her ‘from the toe to the top of direst cruelty’. Shakespeare uses the term ‘cruelty’ to indicate her embracement of her dark, evil side. This further deploys the impact one’s ‘vaulting ambition’ can have on them. The semantic field of supernatural imagery would greatly misalign with the Jacobean expectations at the time, where she was expected to do chores and housework. Furthermore, Lady Macbeth perceives Macbeth as ‘too full of the milk of human kindness’. ‘Milk’ is typically used as a symbol of kindness and fertility, particularly viewed and associated with women, and Lady Macbeth acknowledging the lack of ‘milk’ needed for regicide portrays her as embracing the inhumane and supernatural features, and subverting gender expectations. This encourages the reader to fear and resent the supernatural and Lady Macbeth’s actions, as James I expressed his dislike for the supernatural through the book ‘Demonology’. Shakespeare portrays Lady Macbeth as similar to the supernatural and portrays her as authoritative to demonstrate her pivot from good to evil as a result of her ‘vaulting ambition’.

Shakespeare then portrays Lady Macbeth as far from God and too ‘wade[d] in blood’ Shakespeare portrays her as a person who has strayed away from God due to her abhorred action regicide. This is exemplified through Lady Macbeth saying ‘out damned spot’. This highlights and employs Lady Macbeth as being metaphorically stained with Duncan’s blood. The term ‘damned’ illustrates how Lady Macbeth is forever spiritually cursed by God as a result of her actions, encouraging the readers to stay away from regicide. The term ‘out’ can reiterate her authoritative tone, as the imperative word ‘out’ symbolises her command, and could demonstrate her authority over Macbeth, even after being terminally ill. Shakespeare denotes her as sleepwalking, metaphorically symbolising her association to the ‘wicked’ and supernatural as sleepwalking was only experienced by those who had defied god, according to the contemporary audience. However, Shakespeare may perhaps depict Lady Macbeth as regretful and remorseful for her actions. She says ‘All of the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand’. This conveys a sense of regret, and a desire to ‘sweeten’ the ‘little hand’. By saying ‘sweeten’ instead of simply asking for the metaphorical blood to go away, Shakespeare may perhaps portray Lady Macbeth as acknowledging she is forever metaphorically stained with Duncan’s blood, and the weight of her guilt. This evokes a sense of sympathy from the reader, as Lady Macbeth and Macbeth were not portrayed as evil throughout the play, however driven by their ‘vaulting ambition’, hence making the tale of Macbeth a tragedy. This portrays the devastating effects of regicide, and how it can affect a person, as exemplified through Lady Macbeth. Shakespeare employs Lady Macbeth as a character who is strayed away from God, portraying the effects of regicide.

Shakespeare portrays Lady Macbeth as a woman who was driven by her desires, misaligning from her society to change from good to evil, ultimately portraying the effects of the thirst for power and the effect of ‘vaulting ambition’. From an innocent, typical woman to a ‘fiend-like queen’, Lady Macbeth serves as a warning of the act of regicide to a Jacobean audience.

(edited 1 year ago)

Reply 23

Original post by johnedwards12312
sure, here is the question with pictures attached:
Screenshot 2024-04-21 085054.png
Screenshot 2024-04-21 085110.png
DONE IN EXAM CONDITIONS 46 MINUTES completed
MH - yr10
In the archetypal play ‘Macbeth’, Lady Macbeth is portrayed as a pivotal standpoint, changing from an ‘innocent flower’ to a ‘fiend-like queen’, depicting the impact of her thirst for power, eventually leading to the heinous crime of regicide. Shakespeare portrays her pivot from the typical woman to an abhorred, resented outcast and misalignment from society to portray the impact of one’s ‘vaulting ambition’ and to condemn women who step out of their role in society.
Shakespeare initially portrays Lady Macbeth as a typical woman at the start of the play, similar to any other housewife in the Jacobean era. Lady Macbeth is portrayed as Macbeth's 'dearest love’, where the term ‘dearest' serves to convey Macbeth's love and affection for her. The superlative depicts Macbeth's love for her, typical in a common Jacobean relationship. However, Shakespeare may also portray their relationship as unnatural and atypical to a common relationship at the time through Shakespeare employing Lady Macbeth as Macbeth's ‘partner in greatness'. The term partner symbolises Lady Macbeth’s equality to Macbeth in the relationship, as women were seen as below men in the Jacobean hierarchy, also known as the Great Chain of being. This deploys Lady Macbeth as straying away from her natural order, and this ultimately leads her to become a catalyst of Macbeth’s heinous crime regicide. Thus, Shakespeare may perhaps condemn women who step out of their natural role in society. Shakespeare portrays their relationship to become slightly unnatural to deploy the idea that disobeying God’s will and the Great Chain of Being can cause drastic consequences, as exemplified through Lady Macbeth and Macbeth, who traded away their ‘eternal jewel’, thus warning the audience of defying God. Shakespeare initially portrays Lady Macbeth as a typical housewife, but may perhaps portray her as slightly misaligning to a typical wife to foreshadow her resentful deed regicide.
Shakespeare uses the regicide of king Duncan as a pivot to induce Lady Macbeth’s transformation from an ‘innocent flower’ to a Machiavellian, deceitful woman. Shakespeare employs Lady Macbeth as authoritative and similar to the supernatural, as she is portrayed to welcome Duncan to ‘my battlements’. The term ‘my’ symbolises a sense of authority, overshadowing Macbeth in the relationship. This shocks a Jacobean audience, as women were rarely seen as equal to their partners, let alone hold authority above them. This portrays Lady Macbeth as a changing character, pushed by her thirst for ambition. Lady Macbeth is also seen as similar to the three witches. She uses the metaphysical aid, where she asks the ‘dire spirits’ to ‘unsex her here’ and fill her ‘from the toe to the top of direst cruelty’. Shakespeare uses the term ‘cruelty’ to indicate her embracement of her dark, evil side. This further deploys the impact one’s ‘vaulting ambition’ can have on them. The semantic field of supernatural imagery would greatly misalign with the Jacobean expectations at the time, where she was expected to do chores and housework. Furthermore, Lady Macbeth perceives Macbeth as ‘too full of the milk of human kindness’. ‘Milk’ is typically used as a symbol of kindness and fertility, particularly viewed and associated with women, and Lady Macbeth acknowledging the lack of ‘milk’ needed for regicide portrays her as embracing the inhumane and supernatural features, and subverting gender expectations. This encourages the reader to fear and resent the supernatural and Lady Macbeth’s actions, as James I expressed his dislike for the supernatural through the book ‘Demonology’. Shakespeare portrays Lady Macbeth as similar to the supernatural and portrays her as authoritative to demonstrate her pivot from good to evil as a result of her ‘vaulting ambition’.
Shakespeare then portrays Lady Macbeth as far from God and too ‘wade[d] in blood’ Shakespeare portrays her as a person who has strayed away from God due to her abhorred action regicide. This is exemplified through Lady Macbeth saying ‘out damned spot’. This highlights and employs Lady Macbeth as being metaphorically stained with Duncan’s blood. The term ‘damned’ illustrates how Lady Macbeth is forever spiritually cursed by God as a result of her actions, encouraging the readers to stay away from regicide. The term ‘out’ can reiterate her authoritative tone, as the imperative word ‘out’ symbolises her command, and could demonstrate her authority over Macbeth, even after being terminally ill. Shakespeare denotes her as sleepwalking, metaphorically symbolising her association to the ‘wicked’ and supernatural as sleepwalking was only experienced by those who had defied god, according to the contemporary audience. However, Shakespeare may perhaps depict Lady Macbeth as regretful and remorseful for her actions. She says ‘All of the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand’. This conveys a sense of regret, and a desire to ‘sweeten’ the ‘little hand’. By saying ‘sweeten’ instead of simply asking for the metaphorical blood to go away, Shakespeare may perhaps portray Lady Macbeth as acknowledging she is forever metaphorically stained with Duncan’s blood, and the weight of her guilt. This evokes a sense of sympathy from the reader, as Lady Macbeth and Macbeth were not portrayed as evil throughout the play, however driven by their ‘vaulting ambition’, hence making the tale of Macbeth a tragedy. This portrays the devastating effects of regicide, and how it can affect a person, as exemplified through Lady Macbeth. Shakespeare employs Lady Macbeth as a character who is strayed away from God, portraying the effects of regicide.
Shakespeare portrays Lady Macbeth as a woman who was driven by her desires, misaligning from her society to change from good to evil, ultimately portraying the effects of the thirst for power and the effect of ‘vaulting ambition’. From an innocent, typical woman to a ‘fiend-like queen’, Lady Macbeth serves as a warning of the act of regicide to a Jacobean audience.

Hey, you need to refer a lot more to the extract as well as add a bit more context. Your quotes are good but make sure you use the wording of the question to link back by saying how she 'CHANGES', as well as being specific with our language.(for example, you said the term 'my'.. You could say the use of a possessive pronoun 'my' tells us that Shakespeare is trying to..)

Reply 24

Original post by revision52
Hey, you need to refer a lot more to the extract as well as add a bit more context. Your quotes are good but make sure you use the wording of the question to link back by saying how she 'CHANGES', as well as being specific with our language.(for example, you said the term 'my'.. You could say the use of a possessive pronoun 'my' tells us that Shakespeare is trying to..)

Pls based on this feedback, make some tweaks and then send an improved version to me to mark but good attempt knowing you're in Year 10 and completed this in time conditions. Also i have a few questions for you:-

1.

Did you complete this in under 50 mins? If so, well done

2.

Did you have any notes next to you?

3.

Did you plan your answer before writing?

4.

Did you know you were going to answer this question, or did u plan it in class beforehand or you knew you would answer this question today, so had a look at it, and then wrote in timed condittions;

Remember, in the exam you will have 0 notes and will have to answer this in max. 50 mins referring in detail to the extract and the whole play, and you would get a brand new question which u had never seen before, so your thinking process could delay ur writing in the 50 min time slot.

P.S. my structure for a 30 marker:- P.S. use the word 'CHANGE' (wording)

Introduction - Thesis statement
Paragraph 1: extract
Paragraph 2: the whole play
Paragraph 3: extract
Paragraph 4: the whole play
Paragraph 5: pick either extract or the whole play (your choice)
Conclusion: Summary

Reply 25

Original post by revision52
Pls based on this feedback, make some tweaks and then send an improved version to me to mark but good attempt knowing you're in Year 10 and completed this in time conditions. Also i have a few questions for you:-

1.

Did you complete this in under 50 mins? If so, well done

2.

Did you have any notes next to you?

3.

Did you plan your answer before writing?

4.

Did you know you were going to answer this question, or did u plan it in class beforehand or you knew you would answer this question today, so had a look at it, and then wrote in timed condittions;

Remember, in the exam you will have 0 notes and will have to answer this in max. 50 mins referring in detail to the extract and the whole play, and you would get a brand new question which u had never seen before, so your thinking process could delay ur writing in the 50 min time slot.
P.S. my structure for a 30 marker:- P.S. use the word 'CHANGE' (wording)
Introduction - Thesis statement
Paragraph 1: extract
Paragraph 2: the whole play
Paragraph 3: extract
Paragraph 4: the whole play
Paragraph 5: pick either extract or the whole play (your choice)
Conclusion: Summary

Hello thanks for your inquiry,

I approached this question like i would in an actual exam. I did not view the question beforehand, nor look at any notes. I planned my answer before i started writing, but that was when i was timing myself. I completed it in 46 mins.

I just want to say a huge thanks for giving me your structure. I will try my best to input it into my exam on Monday
Thanks.

PS. also, i will get back to you with an edited version
(edited 1 year ago)

Reply 26

Original post by revision52
Pls based on this feedback, make some tweaks and then send an improved version to me to mark but good attempt knowing you're in Year 10 and completed this in time conditions. Also i have a few questions for you:-

1.

Did you complete this in under 50 mins? If so, well done

2.

Did you have any notes next to you?

3.

Did you plan your answer before writing?

4.

Did you know you were going to answer this question, or did u plan it in class beforehand or you knew you would answer this question today, so had a look at it, and then wrote in timed condittions;

Remember, in the exam you will have 0 notes and will have to answer this in max. 50 mins referring in detail to the extract and the whole play, and you would get a brand new question which u had never seen before, so your thinking process could delay ur writing in the 50 min time slot.
P.S. my structure for a 30 marker:- P.S. use the word 'CHANGE' (wording)
Introduction - Thesis statement
Paragraph 1: extract
Paragraph 2: the whole play
Paragraph 3: extract
Paragraph 4: the whole play
Paragraph 5: pick either extract or the whole play (your choice)
Conclusion: Summary

Can you also mark/level/grade this power and conflict essay as I genuinely dont think I am good at poetry:

COMPARE THE WAY POETS PRESENT THE POWER OF NATURE
In both ‘Storm on the Island’ by Heaney and the ‘Prelude’ by Wordsworth, both poets present nature as an unpredictable force, much more powerful than man in all aspects of life. Both poets make clear that whilst nature can be beautiful and awe-inspiring, it can also be deadly and dangerous.

Firstly, both poets employ highly similar structures to exemplify how power nature truly can be. Both Storm on the Island and the Prelude make use of a cyclical structure. In the Prelude, this cyclical structure shows how the changes throughout the course of the poem were more internal and physiological, rather than external and physical. Furthermore, it exemplifies how the power of nature is never ending. Similarly, Storm on the Island also uses this same cyclical structure, perhaps to make clear that conflict with nature is a viscious cycle than can never be overcome, presenting nature as holding more power over humans. Both poems also seem to include examples of parallelism, however this is more so in the Prelude. In Prelude, parallelism is used to contrast the speakers feelings of pride and with his later feelings of fear and anxiety after his encounter with nature. This is very similar to Storm on the Island because parallelism is used to create a stark juxtaposition between the islanders’ earlier confidence of being “prepared” with their latter feelings of being “bombarded by empty air”. This parallelism therefore makes clear how man’s pride is insignificant ant futile in the face of the omnipotent nature. Also, the fact that both poems are a single stanza long creates a sense of breathlessness in both poems, signposting the complete power of nature and how breath-taking it is. However, Storm on the Island is actually a dramatic monologue whilst the Prelude takes the form of an epic poem. This dramatic monologue form makes the poem seem like a one way conversation between the speaker and reader, mirroring the lonely feelings of the islander’s as their island is bombarded with nature. Contrastingly, the epic poem form of the Prelude shows the events and mood change of the speaker as he journeys through the lake, making clear that whilst human power and pride is temporary, nature is forever. Prelude also uses hypotaxis throughout the poem to create a sense of largeness and smallness, showing how small and miniscule humans are in the all-powerful nature.

In both poems, both speakers seem believe they are even more powerful than nature and we are presented with hubristic speakers in both poems. In Storm on the Island, the islander’s are very confident in their abilities to protect themselves as they make very clear from the outset of the poem that “we are prepared”. The collective pronoun “we” creates a sense of collectivity, suggesting how because they are all together, they believe they can face anything that comes their way. This also creates a highly arrogant tone from the outset of the poem, highlighting the hubris of man. Furthermore, the speaker of the poem seems to exclaim how the “wizened Earth had never troubled us”. The personification of the Earth as “wizened” suggests the Earth is old and wrinkled, further reinforcing this hubris and large ego of man as they believe that they have more power over the Earth in which they inhabit. Similarly with the speaker in Prelude, he stole the boat in an act of “troubled pleasure”. This is a clear oxymoron and shows how he knew it was wrong to steal the boat, but he did it anyway. This hints at his pride as he believed he could get away with stealing without having to face any consequence. Therefore, in both poems, It is clear from the outset of both that there are two hubristic, over-confident speakers who truly believe they are more powerful and better than nature.

However, as the poems progress, it becomes ever so clear that this Is not the case. Both speakers are seen as weak in the face of nature, juxtaposing their earlier feelings. In Storm on the Island, the islander’s are soon “bombarded by empty air”. This is a paradoxical statement as it is not possible to be bombarded by something that is not physically there. However this presents nature us unpredictable and omnipotent as it is able to do as it pleases. Furthermore, the harsh verb and plosive ‘b’ sound of “bombarded” suggests that the islanders’ are fully being attacked by the wind, presenting nature as a powerful, chaotic, mercurial force. Similarly, in the Prelude, nature is presented as highly powerful as the mountain is described by the speaker as “a huge peak, black and huge”. The colour imagery “black” connotes chaos and disaster whilst the repetition of the blunt adjective “huge” emphasizes the sheer, gigantic size of the mountain. This therefore presents nature as more powerful than man in every aspect in both poems. Wordsworth himself was one of the most well-known Romantic poets of his time and he really believed in natures power, which could be the reason behind why he chose to make nature one of the main, if not, the most significant theme in his poem. In addition, the speaker of the Prelude rode with “trembling oars”. The verb “trembling” connotes a level of unpreparedness and inability to row, showing how his experience with nature scarred him, making nature seem much more powerful and mighty than any man.

Furthermore, in both poems nature is further highlighted as powerful as it is capable of instilling fear into the speakers of both poems. In Storm on the Island, the speaker makes it clear how it is “Strange,” that it is a “huge nothing that we [the islanders] fear”. The oxymoron of “huge nothing” creates a sense of both largeness and smallness, showing how nature is able to take many forms, but they are all equally as powerful. In addition, the caesura after “strange” shows how the speaker can not comprehend the reason for his fear surrounding the wind. This shows the way in which nature is able to cause so much fear without even doing much, presenting it as clearly a force that is way more powerful than man. In comparison to nature, human power is every fleeting and highly transient. Many believe that Storm on the Island is an extended metaphor for the troubles faced by Ireland, in particular Stormont in the past. There was much conflict as the Protestants and Catholics were bitterly opposed. However, it was not only religious tension which caused much conflict, but also political conflict as many wanted independence from Britain whilst others didn’t. Heaney, being Irish himself would have been well aware and even lived through these troubles, which could be why he chose to make conflict such a prominent theme within his poem. However, we are presented with this same idea of fear surrounding nature in the Prelude too because nearing the end of the poem, the speaker talks about how “no familiar shapes remained”. This makes clear the psychological torment nature faced him with is something he will never forget. This idea is further reinforced as what he saw seemed to be a “trouble to my [his] dreams”. This could be understood as a euphemism for PTSD, and this reflects the way in which he is unable to think about anything other then nature. This could have been quite similar for Wordsworth as he loved nature. He had a difficult upbringing and some difficult experiences with his father, thus making the Lake District his favourite place to go and relieve some stress. This could therefore explain why he wanted to make clear how powerful nature was as he opposed to things such as the Industrial Revolution as he was openly a Romantic poet. Interestingly however, In the Prelude, nature is not always presented as harmful. Earlier in the poem, there were “small circles glittering idly”. The sibilance used here creates a soft, light tone creating an atmosphere of tranquility. Furthermore, the light imagery creates a vivid image of beauty, reflecting how nature also has the power to be astonishingly breath-taking. This in turn makes clear that nature will only harm those who harm it. Therefore, in poems, we are again, faced with the idea that nature is capable of anything. It can be beautiful but can also cause mass destruction.

To conclude, I believe that both poets wanted to show how dangerous nature can possibly be. It is a force which holds much more power than man or anything else. Whilst it can be beautiful, if you underestimate or mistreat it, you are likely to feel its wrath, which is an idea we are presented with in both poems. Therefore, both poems include many similarities as they both highlight nature’s power over man.

Quick Reply