Original post
by threeportdrift
It's not really, it's mostly nonsense! A PhD and a doctorate are exactly the same thing. It is a degree because it is a programme of academic work that has to reach a preset level of assessment decided by a University in order to be given recognition - a PhD.
It differs from an undergraduate degree and a Masters degree because it has no set syllabus, it is not taught. The general requirement of a PhD is that you produce a piece of research that adds to the body of human knowledge (the exact phrase used varies, but that's the gist).
You apply for it in much the same way as a Masters degree (no UCAS), but there may be a few more steps because of the funding process.
Thereafter, PhDs vary quite a lot between Arts/Humanities and Sciences, in part because of the research methods but mainly because of the funding sources. In the sciences, because you often need access to labs and equipment, and because of the nature of the questions that need answering, the work is often done in teams. So an established academic will win some funding (from a Research Council, a charity, a company, a private donor, or some combination), and will then be able to fund a group of research students to help with the research, each student taking on some small part of the whole project as their PhD topic. Psych/neuroscience will work in this way, with the added element of likely NHS tie ins.
In the Arts, there is much less funding, although it comes form many of the same sources as science funding, and research is rarely done in any sort of team, it is an individual topic that you choose before you apply.