PhD lead supervisor won't reply?

Hard to say what the chances are. It's only been 5 working days, which isn't a long time in academia!
Anyway, I just wanted to say unfortunately I'm experiencing very poor health at the moment and my brain is too broken to deal with anything other than the very light-hearted on TSR. I wish you all the best but please don't tag me any further, or expect anymore comments from me on any threads of yours

For whatever its worth, I would second this, everything takes forever until its deadline day.
Unless Im misunderstanding or indeed you're in a very special place supervised by the elites, them shaping and refusing your study to suit their own aims is a little "on the nose"

Yes they wanted a lot of revisions so I'm assuming my proposal wasn't that good I guess

Ah to the proposal, and I know this is conflated but not to change fundamentally what you wish to study?
Supervisors do have choices, but it shouldnt completely change what you want to do but of course this has to go through ethics, have sound methodology and etc which Im sure you are very aware of being a potential PhD candidate, its disappointing I know but try to hang on.
I personally had a converse experience, I was accepted onto the doctorate programme assigned supervisors then they tried to change everything, but this was after I was enrolled so felt a bit "better" as in, Im in! But then theres a problem at every turn and one of my two supervisors is sending me information I dont agree with so it ends up being a bit like "is this my or your research", they tell you its yours and you have to be interested as its a slog. Then simultaneously change it. But they have to supervise it too so its hard to not see some things personally and such.
Nevertheless, just hang fire, its the 10th on Wedneday, distract yourself and deal with what comes. use your best anxiety management techniques

Hard to say what the chances are. It's only been 5 working days, which isn't a long time in academia!
Anyway, I just wanted to say unfortunately I'm experiencing very poor health at the moment and my brain is too broken to deal with anything other than the very light-hearted on TSR. I wish you all the best but please don't tag me any further, or expect anymore comments from me on any threads of yours

I'm hoping they don't ask to change anything because then its just annoying.
It's my research like you said no theirs so why insist so much on changing unless the proposal is very poorly written

Hmm strange how your brain is broken only on my threads but whatever

It is the Easter break when a lot of academics are going to conferences and trying to catch up on their own research. 5 days is not long.
Also, the supervisors said revise and resubmit - which you have now done. It will now go to be reviewed. I’m not sure what response you were hoping to get from the supervisor in the meantime, but she may not be able to get into personal correspondence about an application that is still pending final review.

I'm hoping they don't ask to change anything because then its just annoying.
It's my research like you said no theirs so why insist so much on changing unless the proposal is very poorly written

I was encouraged to contact them and the email said they would be happy to advise. My second supervisor said to contact her so that's why I did

news?

That's not exactly what I said, I may not have explained myself properly. I conflated some of the information and the question you were asking.
What I'm saying is unless you are training at a super elite faculty to join THEIR research and branch it for your own doctorate its unusual for them to strongarm you too far away from the research you propose/want to do. Your supervisor is the "principal investigator" its their arse.
What a supervisor can do is say they don't want to supervise you unless X Y Z. What post doctorate people are in a unique position to support you with is proposing properly. "Properly" meaning to meet requirements you may not be aware of yet and believe me there are a lot, apologies if you already know this. Using the right methods to achieve your question, narrowing down your question to something achievable - this I'm personally still up against as I'm constantly adding potential variables. It is challenging but should not reshape what you want to study so much it doesn't actually answer
Not knowing your subject matter the politics could play a part as upon completion and successful viva you are going to have your thesis in the public domain with your university named on it. I have personal thoughts on this but they're sort of moot as it is what it is.
Wait until you submit ethics!

You're a pain do you know that?
ACCEPTANCE letter

As covered in the previous thread, that's not how research proposals work for PhD's in the UK. If they are engaging with you and asking for amendments then that is generally a good sign. If your proposal was hot garbage they would either say no or would just blank you.
I agree with the above btw, 5 working days is absolutely nothing.
I appreciate this is frustrating but please keep things civil. You are getting a lot of quick, free advice from people well positioned to answer your questions. You had circa 50 replies about your proposal/appplication in one thread and 30 in another.