I agree that the whole process is horribly stressful. It's also designed to force 17/18-year olds to gamble when it comes to their future. UCAS keep looking at reforming it, but never change anything significant.
I sometimes look at the DiscoverUni data, but hate the way that they band the UCAS points, so tend to stick with the data on The Uni Guide.
Anyway, I have another set of data to throw at you. For each "subject area" (
not specific course) UCAS publish statistics which how how many applicants were accepted, by university, and show whether they applied via the "main scheme" (the usual "pick five choices" process) or not (i.e. they applied via Extra or Clearing).
You can see all these numbers
here (pick Applications and Acceptances in the bottom left to start, and then filter as you wish).
According to this, University of Birmingham accepted 560 applicants into "Law" (generally) last year, of which 45 didn't apply via the main scheme, of which 20 were domiciled in the UK.
The same numbers for University of Nottingham are 455 accepted, of which 20 were not via the main scheme, of which 5 were domiciled in the UK.
We don't know what grades these students got, only that they applied via Extra or Clearing and were accepted. This does
suggest that some applicants who just miss their offer grades might be accepted.
So it all comes down to how much of a gambler you are. Are you feeling lucky?
