Hi!
It's good to see you are asking the right questions and early before getting in. A lot of people get caught out, so I am glad for you doing your due diligence.
Please bear in mind my views are only based off of my minimal time there (<2 years) and only based off clinical biochemistry. There are many other different departments and this may give a completely different experiences! Microbiology and Haematology and Histopathology etc. seem vastly different, so there is that to bear in mind.
Biomedical scientists need HCPC registration both for private and the NHS as it is a 'protected' job title.
I don't think a medical editor needs a HCPC registration - you can see which roles need HCPC registration you can visit
https://www.hcpc-uk.org/about-us/who-we-regulate/the-professions/ I'd imagine a medical editor should be more focused on the research aspect and therefore I think they are more concerned with your understanding of research and may be advantageous if you have a postgraduate background. I would double check with the journals themselves and their career pages. Nature journal is a good one to start with, you could email them or even researchers of journal articles themselves.
What I liked:
1.) I worked in Clinical biochemistry, main lab where it is quite automated. Here we'd do a variety of tests (all mostly on one type of machine) and it would get busy during peak times. I enjoyed being busy and working with lots of people.
2.) the managers and most of the seniors were nice in my particular lab
3.) Working cross sites, for our trust we work on two different sites. It helps make the environment feel different and you get to see different people. Although this was a double-edged sword because I had a permit on one site, but not the other and it is quite hard or costly to get parking.
4.) Following patient's results and learning new stuff (conditions, tests, etc.). A lot of this you are exposed to but it's what you go look up yourself after seeing the patient has it...
5.) Working with knowledgable people who have been there decades, they know so many interesting things from a lab perspective, science perspective and life in general.
6.) Sometimes you get to work with clinical scientists and physicians, you can learn a lot from them. Involvement with them is minimal but can be quite interesting when you do. For example when dealing with abnormal samples that need special treatment, or results authorisation.
7.) I enjoyed the degree itself and glad I chose an IBMS accredited one so it wasn't 'dead weight' in BMS applications. The degree is very similar to a biochemistry course, but just with a few modules different (related to the BMS fields). It brought in the best of both worlds for me personally. The beauty of this particular degree also is that you can switch into other fields too, you don't have to only be a BMS. Whilst other courses (like a biochemistry degree) couldn't become a BMS in biochemistry. The dissertation in final year (as occurs with most life science degrees) was quite fun, but my topic was really difficult and I was under a world renowned researcher. This might be right up your alley with your interest in medical editorials.
What I didn't like:
1.) Specialist sections in Clinical biochemistry. These are more niche areas where the workload is not as much. I despise bursts of not being busy, and felt extremely ADHD so this was not for me. However the science side for this is interesting, but as a band 5 scientist you don't get too deep into that. You'd need to become more senior or need to become a clinical scientist to be fully into the science side. You are more of the 'manual operator' of the testing
2.) Salary sacrifice in the NHS. I was paid more working in private healthcare, you'll typically get paid 10% more in private.
3.) Felt more like a 'manual operator' than a scientist. Generally felt a lack of science and research (I guess it is outside the remit of the role).
4.) I could not see myself there in 10 years time. Going in I thought the management side would be more so dealing with people and an attractive future prospect, but now it seems very procedural, updating policies, reviewing Key Performance Indicators, dealing with standard operating procedures, quality management and ISO standards.
5.) Lack of patient contact. I prefer speaking to new and lots of different types of people.
6.) My studies feel incomplete and there is so much more I feel like I want to know and learn (although not really required for the role).
Mandatory checklist
1.) IBMS accredited degree (it should say this on the course website). You can't become a BMS without it which is why many are in limbo as MLA'S for years. If there is only one thing you take from this post make sure its this. MAKE SURE YOUR DEGREE IS IBMS ACCREDITED.
2.) IBMS Generic portfolio (done in the lab) composed of questions set by the lab and evidence pieces you must collect that meet criteria set. This usually takes 1 year, you typically need a trainee BMS post and need a thumbs up from the lab for them to give you this.
3.) Not all NHS trusts are allowed to train people, but usually NHS BMS job posts will say if they can train you or not visit trac.jobs for this
Not required but wouldn't hurt
1.) if you have free time whilst at uni you could obtain work as an Associate Practitioner (AP) in the lab or a MLA in specimen reception (this will help you learn the variety of tests if dealing with something like immunology or biochemistry)
2.) If an MLA try to get promoted to an AP. You will build a reputation by doing this
3.) Work experience/visit different departments some may not sound interesting on paper but might be fun in person
4.) Understand what the bulk of the work is that you are applying to, many interviewers get offended when you don't know the work from a general perspective and you will lose to candidates who do know
What I'd do if I didn't get into medicine:
I would look at the STP programme to become a clinical scientist, you need a 2.1 bachelors degree. The programme gives you a fully-funded Masters and is a 2-year training programme by the NHS where you get paid at band 6 as a trainee clinical scientist and go to uni. I believe Uni of Manchester seems to be the hub for this rn, but you get to apply to NHS trusts outside of manchester (you just travel there for uni days). It is quite competitive but the science side seems more in depth and the candidates seem very bright.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Best of luck!