for ur structure it a bit wrong
from experience i got 9/12 for a mock question but i misses a disagree paragraph which would have given me 12/12
u adda an intro
this means defining the key word in statement
then 2 agree and 2 disagree
then an evaluation paragraph
but ur essay is a level 3
hope the feedback below helps
Many Christians believe God is omnibenevolent, all loving, and Hell is a place for people to suffer, so why would a loving God send people there? (This paragraph introduces the topic well by presenting the concept of God's omnibenevolence and the existence of Hell. However, try to directly address the statement by discussing the compatibility of a loving God with the concept of Hell.)
A Christian may agree with the statement because they believe Hell doesn't really exist: it is just a way for God or the Church to incentivise us to turn to him. Because of the Bible teaching us of God's omnibenevolence and omnipresence, they may argue that Hell cannot exist because no place can exist without God, and even if he was there, we are taught that 'God is forgiving and merciful' in the Bible, so He would never send individuals there. Moreover, the Devil is believed to be a broken part of God Himself, a fallen angel, so a Christian may say that Hell is a place for the broken to be forgiven. (You provide an interesting perspective on Hell as a metaphor and the nature of God's forgiveness. To strengthen your argument, consider including specific biblical references or teachings that support this view.)
However, a Christian may argue that Hell is an incentive to turn to God, disagreeing with the statement because Hell is a way for God to reassure devoted Christians that they will be rewarded in Heaven while sinners who go against God will suffer. This is a way for God to show love to his believers. Moreover, some Christians believe that Hell is the only place where God doesn't exist, but how can this be, for we are told that "God is in every place"? The Bible teaches that God is omnipresent on Earth, but Hell transcends our understanding, so things may occur like a lack of God (in Hell). (This paragraph presents a contrasting viewpoint effectively, acknowledging the role of Hell as a deterrent and a reassurance for believers. However, ensure that you explore the implications of God's omnipresence in relation to Hell more deeply to fully address the statement.)
In conclusion, I agree with the statement because God is omnibenevolent and merciful, so he would forgive all sinners who would otherwise go to Hell, and therefore, Hell doesn't literally exist, only as a metaphor for disappointing God. (Your conclusion aligns with the statement and summarizes your position clearly. To enhance your argument, consider discussing the potential for repentance and redemption as part of God's mercy, which could further support the non-literal existence of Hell.)
Level: 3
Overall feedback: Your essay presents a thoughtful exploration of the statement, considering both sides of the argument regarding God's nature and the existence of Hell. You demonstrate a good understanding of Christian beliefs about God's attributes and the purpose of Hell. To improve, ensure that you provide specific scriptural or doctrinal evidence to support your points, and explore the nuances of God's justice in relation to His love. Additionally, aim to integrate your discussion more cohesively, ensuring that each paragraph contributes to a comprehensive evaluation of the statement.
What went well: You have successfully presented different Christian perspectives on the existence of Hell and its compatibility with a loving God. Your conclusion is clear and aligns with the statement.
Even better if: To improve, provide more specific biblical references to support your arguments, and explore the relationship between God's justice and love in more depth. Integrating your discussion throughout the essay will also strengthen your evaluation.