Can someone explain why the answer to this question is C?

Im pretty sure its due to the air resistance slowing down the ball when its fired as the velocity fired > falling velocity thus more drag acts on the ball when its going up so it comes to rest quicker - but if thats the case then if the velocity fired < falling velocity then less drag would act, so with that logic shouldnt the answer be D?

I may be completely wrong with my thinking, but any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

Im pretty sure its due to the air resistance slowing down the ball when its fired as the velocity fired > falling velocity thus more drag acts on the ball when its going up so it comes to rest quicker - but if thats the case then if the velocity fired < falling velocity then less drag would act, so with that logic shouldnt the answer be D?

I may be completely wrong with my thinking, but any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

(edited 3 months ago)

I could be completely wrong here; physics isn't my strong suit! However, I would've thought that the cannonball would take less time to go up because it has the momentum from, well, being shot out of a cannon lmao. But then when it reaches its peak height, it has 0 velocity, and then starts accelerating until it reaches its terminal velocity. I presume that the time to reach terminal velocity is longer going down than the time to reach 0 velocity going up?

You're probably right i just cant seem to wrap my head around why that happens for some reason, but thanks

Ordinarily with suvat with no air resistance, the time going up till max height equals time going down, which is why I put my originally wrong answer on the paper.

I dont really know how to implement a increasing factor of drag force alongside suvats - the drag would have to be a function of velocity^2 or smth and im not really too sure how to do that

I dont really know how to implement a increasing factor of drag force alongside suvats - the drag would have to be a function of velocity^2 or smth and im not really too sure how to do that

Original post by mosaurlodon

Ordinarily with suvat with no air resistance, the time going up till max height equals time going down, which is why I put my originally wrong answer on the paper.

I dont really know how to implement a increasing factor of drag force alongside suvats - the drag would have to be a function of velocity^2 or smth and im not really too sure how to do that

I dont really know how to implement a increasing factor of drag force alongside suvats - the drag would have to be a function of velocity^2 or smth and im not really too sure how to do that

The (negative) acceleration on the way up is < -9.8 and on the way down its > -9.8.

So the average speed will be less on the way down and hence the time will be longer to cover the same distance. You dont need an accurate model of air resistance, just that acceleration is < or > -g (and its not necessarily constant either).

(edited 3 months ago)

Ohh I think I get it, so while going up the (downwards) acceleration = weight + drag, while going down the acceleration = weight - drag

and with constant initial velocity going upwards and final velocity while coming down - (as they should be the same?)

If acceleration increases, time must decrease?

So what is the "not necessarily constant" thing you mentioned - are you talking about acceleration?

and with constant initial velocity going upwards and final velocity while coming down - (as they should be the same?)

If acceleration increases, time must decrease?

So what is the "not necessarily constant" thing you mentioned - are you talking about acceleration?

Original post by mosaurlodon

Ohh I think I get it, so while going up the (downwards) acceleration = weight + drag, while going down the acceleration = weight - drag

and with constant initial velocity going upwards and final velocity while coming down - (as they should be the same?)

If acceleration increases, time must decrease?

So what is the "not necessarily constant" thing you mentioned - are you talking about acceleration?

and with constant initial velocity going upwards and final velocity while coming down - (as they should be the same?)

If acceleration increases, time must decrease?

So what is the "not necessarily constant" thing you mentioned - are you talking about acceleration?

The "not constant" is just that suvat could give you inspiration (so talk about whether a is less than or greater than g) but its not necessarily accurate depending on how air resistance is modelled.

Tbh, questions like this are less about equations and more about choosing an extreme thought experiment. Imagine firing a guy out of a cannon with their parachute always open (up and down). Theyd rapidly decelerate on the way up and float down gradually. Problem solved.

But youre correct about

net force = gravity +/- drag

and hence reason about the acceleration (but its not really necessary if you pick a good example/experiment).

(edited 3 months ago)

Oh yeah that analogy makes things a lot easier.

Wouldve been good if I thought about that 2 weeks ago.... thanks

Wouldve been good if I thought about that 2 weeks ago.... thanks

- Studio takeover opportunity for Warwick students
- Physics projectile
- Projectile motion as level
- Warwick accom international student postgrad 2023
- Mechanics (projectile motion)
- Trump v. US: Supreme Court Issues Ruling on Presidential Immunity in Criminal Cases
- Sixth form in Bolton
- very conflicted
- Why is Rachel Zegler so hated?
- Pig work experience
- Edexcel English Language Creative Writing
- Warwick Accomodation
- Is hair removal cream for men any good? I want to get some.
- Canon slade or runshaw
- Durham English Exchange
- Who do you think is the best military commander ever?
- Advertisting your Uni Room? Click Here (Restarted Thread)
- Warwick Uni Accomodation
- Last Person to Post an Emoji Here Wins!
- GCSE predictions 2024 :)

Latest

Trending

Last reply 1 month ago

Wanting to pursue a career on Astrophysics/Astronomy but bad at maths and sciencePhysics

2

2