The Student Room Group

Eng Lit - what happens if you write a good answer about the wrong thing?

Like for example if you wrote a really good 30 mark worthy answer about how Mrs Birling is presented as selfish, but then you left the exam and found out that the question was actually about Mr Birling, what would happen? They can see clearly that you can do good analysis and write good answers, but you’ve not written about the correct thing. As much as you can write a good answer, you couldn’t read the question properly. So what marks would you get?

Reply 1

i asked my teacher this, if you answer the wrong thing ur capped at 16/30, so ig if u do a rly good mrs b essay u would get 16/30

Reply 2

Original post by KingsleyArtha1
i asked my teacher this, if you answer the wrong thing ur capped at 16/30, so ig if u do a rly good mrs b essay u would get 16/30

Sorry but actually it depends on the level of your answer....u can even get 30/30....(as i did after making a similar such blunder this year)

Reply 3

Original post by fdfsfafafdafd
Sorry but actually it depends on the level of your answer....u can even get 30/30....(as i did after making a similar such blunder this year)

Usually I do think they cap your answer (but I don't know how at what mark) but AQA decided this year (and whatever year Mrs Birling was the AIC question previously) that they would mark someone's answer who mistook Mrs Birling for Mr Birling as if it were a question on Mr Birling because on both years so many people misread the question. If you wrote an answer on Sheila rather than Mrs Birling for example, then your response doesn't answer the question head on so you'd be capped (as less of your answer is relevant to the question).

Reply 4

Original post by Super Sprinkles
Usually I do think they cap your answer (but I don't know how at what mark) but AQA decided this year (and whatever year Mrs Birling was the AIC question previously) that they would mark someone's answer who mistook Mrs Birling for Mr Birling as if it were a question on Mr Birling because on both years so many people misread the question. If you wrote an answer on Sheila rather than Mrs Birling for example, then your response doesn't answer the question head on so you'd be capped (as less of your answer is relevant to the question).

But I didn't make that mistake actually... I wrote abt social change but not abt the inspector at all...I just spoke abt the birlings....so I don't think it really matters....things happen on a case to case basis and think it is unfair to scare people into believing that their destiny is just being stuck within the tiny spectrum of marks with the cap and make them think they've lost out on a grade....believe me, it can be severely disturbing

Reply 5

Original post by sahanaseth
But I didn't make that mistake actually... I wrote abt social change but not abt the inspector at all...I just spoke abt the birlings....so I don't think it really matters....things happen on a case to case basis and think it is unfair to scare people into believing that their destiny is just being stuck within the tiny spectrum of marks with the cap and make them think they've lost out on a grade....believe me, it can be severely disturbing

Idk in the exam I was like the Inspector, the inspector, make sure you talk about the inspector! But if you include other characters that's good too - particularly if you link it back to the inspector, contrasts, parallels or whatever, it's better if there's an obvious direct link to the question as then it's less likely the examiner will think you're waffling about anything you know about the texts. My teacher taught me this from the getgo when I learned the hard way in my first year 10 mock.
Yea sorry I shouldn't have been so insensitive. I was just trying to relay that you need to link your argument to the question (as otherwise you're answering another question) but obviously your essay doesn't have to be entirely focussed on the 1 character in the question

Reply 6

Original post by Super Sprinkles
Idk in the exam I was like the Inspector, the inspector, make sure you talk about the inspector! But if you include other characters that's good too - particularly if you link it back to the inspector, contrasts, parallels or whatever, it's better if there's an obvious direct link to the question as then it's less likely the examiner will think you're waffling about anything you know about the texts. My teacher taught me this from the getgo when I learned the hard way in my first year 10 mock.
Yea sorry I shouldn't have been so insensitive. I was just trying to relay that you need to link your argument to the question (as otherwise you're answering another question) but obviously your essay doesn't have to be entirely focussed on the 1 character in the question

I very much agree and thank you for your response

actually in my exam, not once did i even take the inspectors name....oof god the anxiety that exam brought me....i can laugh about it now but then i literally begged my lit teacher to somehow convince my stupid brain that i will survive

Quick Reply