The Student Room Group

WJEC As Chemistry

Thoughts? I thought it was a good paper

Scroll to see replies

Original post by study23!
Thoughts? I thought it was a good paper

Same it went alright some of the calculations were a bit mid tho
Reply 2
Original post by 18RPritchard
Same it went alright some of the calculations were a bit mid tho

I thought the calculations were nicer than normal but they were split up weirdly, makes me think maybes some fo them were too good to be true 🀷*♀️
Original post by study23!
I thought the calculations were nicer than normal but they were split up weirdly, makes me think maybes some fo them were too good to be true 🀷*♀️
tbh i thought past paper questions were way easier
Reply 4
Original post by 18RPritchard
tbh i thought past paper questions were way easier

Maybe I misread them 😣
At least they were all like 2 marks each except the pv=nrt and energy questions.
Original post by study23!
Maybe I misread them 😣
At least they were all like 2 marks each except the pv=nrt and energy questions.

the energy was the wavelength one right ?
Original post by 18RPritchard
tbh i thought past paper questions were way easier

Facts
Reply 7
Original post by 18RPritchard
the energy was the wavelength one right ?

Yes
Reply 8
Original post by Hamzakhanivore
Facts

Now I'm worried haha πŸ˜‚ which questions did everyone find hardest?
Original post by study23!
Yes

i got that one i think, the paper was overall alright but some calcs were eh but only like 6 marks of them so it should be alright
Reply 10
Original post by 18RPritchard
i got that one i think, the paper was overall alright but some calcs were eh but only like 6 marks of them so it should be alright

Yeah. Thoughts on 6 marker? Thought it was alright
Original post by study23!
Yeah. Thoughts on 6 marker? Thought it was alright
it was good i thought could have been so much worse we were lucky compared to last years 😭
Reply 12
Original post by Imogen1039
it was good i thought could have been so much worse we were lucky compared to last years 😭

Agreed. What did you put to improve the thing to find the optimums?
Reply 13
Original post by 18RPritchard
Same it went alright some of the calculations were a bit mid tho


To calculate the wavelength did you do wavelength = hc/ E and then convert KJ into J?
Reply 14
Original post by study23!
Agreed. What did you put to improve the thing to find the optimums?


concentration?
Reply 15
Original post by study23!
I thought the calculations were nicer than normal but they were split up weirdly, makes me think maybes some fo them were too good to be true 🀷*♀️

What did you get for the two questions asking about moles in the double titration?
Reply 16
Original post by emilyhollland
What did you get for the two questions asking about moles in the double titration?
7 something x10^-4. They were very close numbers which I think is why the 1:1 ratio worked in the second last question
Reply 17
Original post by study23!
7 something x10^-4. They were very close numbers which I think is why the 1:1 ratio worked in the second last question

yes! I think I got that as well
Reply 18
Original post by emilyhollland
yes! I think I got that as well

It's always a good sign when someone else has the same thing πŸ˜‚
Original post by study23!
7 something x10^-4. They were very close numbers which I think is why the 1:1 ratio worked in the second last question
Same

Quick Reply