Scroll to see replies
Did you do the negative repricocal for the the reflected for line or just the negative gradient for the last q on fp1?
Original post by grey_boredom
Did you do the negative repricocal for the the reflected for line or just the negative gradient for the last q on fp1?
I am not sure if i am correct
Yeah i did negative reciprocal and got a nice answer but by just googling i saw that reflection is f(-x) so it prob wrong
Original post by grey_boredom
Yeah i did negative reciprocal and got a nice answer but by just googling i saw that reflection is f(-x) so it prob wrong
I got the value for p as 8 rt(3)
Original post by grey_boredom
Yeah i did negative reciprocal and got a nice answer but by just googling i saw that reflection is f(-x) so it prob wrong
Original post by RishiM1908
I got the value for p as 8 rt(3)
by using just negative gradient? cus I got p = 5
Original post by JustWade
FLip, btw for the first inequality q how many x ranges did you get, did you also get a val like root 2 by 2
yeah, like -1<x< -root(2) U root(2)/2 < x < 1
did you have to do set notation?
Original post by grey_boredom
Yeah i did negative reciprocal and got a nice answer but by just googling i saw that reflection is f(-x) so it prob wrong
actually getting my hopes up here because I got 8root3 somehow, but I wrote after the part I wrote 8root3 so do you think they’d invalidate it?
Original post by Brym07
How did everyone find Further Pure 1 and 2. I found Further Pure 1 alright, and Further Pure 2 utterly awful
More or less the same for me. FP1 was decent and FP2 was so so bad
Original post by LQMN
What were your values for a in the vector q?
Original post by LQMN
What were your values for a in the vector q?
I got -5 and -7
Original post by jayr boni
actually getting my hopes up here because I got 8root3 somehow, but I wrote after the part I wrote 8root3 so do you think they’d invalidate it?
Better hope your examiner is nice
Original post by JustWade
did you have to do set notation?
Yes i did just simplifying
Original post by Brym07
How did everyone find Further Pure 1 and 2. I found Further Pure 1 alright, and Further Pure 2 utterly awful
Original post by grey_boredom
Did you do the negative repricocal for the the reflected for line or just the negative gradient for the last q on fp1?
How were the conic section/ vector questions? For FP1
Original post by grey_boredom
Did you do the negative repricocal for the the reflected for line or just the negative gradient for the last q on fp1?
Original post by JustWade
FLip, btw for the first inequality q how many x ranges did you get, did you also get a val like root 2 by 2
I got 1,-1, and plus/minus root 2 over 2
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- A-level Exam Discussions 2024
- gyg - beating laziness as a y12 student
- Edexcel A-Level Maths & Further Maths Grade Boundaries 2024
- Edexcel A-level further mathematics grade boundaries 2024
- 2024 17th May Further Maths AS Level Paper 2
- A level further maths modules (edexcel)
- I need help for picking A-levels
- Further math modules
- Year 11 GCSE and Year 13 A-Level Request Your Exam Timetable Thread
- A Level subject combination
- Further Maths or Physics A Level
- DIfference between 9709 and 9709/22
- Is it possible to get into LSE BSc finance without FM
- GCSE Exam Discussions 2023
- IAL Further Maths
- Go ahead in time as far as possible
- Year 12 forum 2024-2025
- A Level Further Maths Options
- Architecture courses
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 month ago
Eduqas A-level Media Studies Component 1 (A680U10-1) - 20th May 2024 [Exam Chat]A-levels
36
71
Last reply 3 months ago
EDEXCEL Religious Studies Paper 2- Religion and Ethics [9RS0] - Monday 17th June 2024A-levels
19
42
Last reply 3 months ago
Edexcel A level chemistry paper 1 (9CH01/01)— Mon 10 June 2024A-levels
71
125
Last reply 3 months ago
AQA A-level Physical Education Paper 1 (7582/1) - 24th May 2024 [Exam Chat]A-levels
21
34
