The Student Room Group

Rebecca Joynes: Teacher guilty of sex with two boys

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Truly awful, hopefully she will never be around young people again and there will never be another victim.

The commentary surrounding this on social media is appalling. 'The boys were lucky', 'Wish I had that at school', etc. If the victims were girls then nobody would be supporting the teacher. Sadly some people hold very sexist beliefs and disregard predatory behaviour, paedophilia and (what is effectively) rape when the victims are men / boys.
Original post by SHallowvale
Truly awful, hopefully she will never be around young people again and there will never be another victim.

The commentary surrounding this on social media is appalling. 'The boys were lucky', 'Wish I had that at school', etc. If the victims were girls then nobody would be supporting the teacher. Sadly some people hold very sexist beliefs and disregard predatory behaviour, paedophilia and (what is effectively) rape when the victims are men / boys.

Agreed and according to the UK law the woman cannot be viewed as a rapist (read this somewhere but I have no idea whether that’s true or not).

Time to change the law.

Reply 3

Original post by Talkative Toad
Agreed and according to the UK law the woman cannot be viewed as a rapist (read this somewhere but I have no idea whether that’s true or not).
Time to change the law.

I dunno, it's generally accepted you need a penis to rape people, other acts are covered in other ways. Past that you obv get issues of 'statutory rape' due to ages etc which could be claimed here, but I don't consider someone refusing consent and someone legally not being allowed to consent who wants to as the same thing.

I feel a problem might be that we place a lot more emotive weight to the word rape than sexual assault etc even though they both address the same idea of forced contact or penetration. It's not like she's been found innocent of anything.

Obv a very complicated topic, but just my opinion.
Original post by StriderHort
I dunno, it's generally accepted you need a penis to rape people, other acts are covered in other ways. Past that you obv get issues of 'statutory rape' due to ages etc which could be claimed here, but I don't consider someone refusing consent and someone legally not being allowed to consent who wants to as the same thing.

I feel a problem might be that we place a lot more emotive weight to the word rape than sexual assault etc even though they both address the same idea of forced contact or penetration. It's not like she's been found innocent of anything.

Obv a very complicated topic, but just my opinion.


I mean I don’t even know whether this is sexual assault or not (in that the article doesn’t use the term) but it’s sickening what she’s done regardless though.

Reply 5

Serial groomer and rapist deserves a long prison sentence. Of course our justice system is a joke so she'll get 6 months suspended and back to teaching in a year.

Reply 6


What’s the world got to stoop low to have sex with students disgusting.

Reply 7

Dealing with some questions raised above, the offence of rape can only be committed by a man. The main offence in question in the case under discussion was sexual activity with a child, contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

"Statutory rape" is an American legal concept which has no precise analog in the laws of the United Kingdom.

Reply 8

Original post by Guru Jason
Serial groomer and rapist deserves a long prison sentence. Of course our justice system is a joke so she'll get 6 months suspended and back to teaching in a year.

You are mistaken. The teacher will receive an immediate custodial sentence and will not be permitted to teach again.

Reply 9

Original post by Stiffy Byng
You are mistaken. The teacher will receive an immediate custodial sentence and will not be permitted to teach again.

That's what should happen. It won't though.

Reply 10

How can she be so pathetic to be “flattered” by teenage boys??? This woman is about to be in her 30s!!!! This is sickly

Reply 11

The UK justice system is a sham and the current government has no will to improve it so I doubt she'll see the years she deserves. Although as long as she is never allowed near a minor again, there should hopefully be no more victims.

Reply 12

Original post by Guru Jason
That's what should happen. It won't though.

Pretty sure she's going to back to prison, allegations of broken justice systems and prisons are like holiday camps etc etc non withstanding.

Reply 13

If we go back to the way it was the problems will fix themselves.

Reply 14

Original post by Guru Jason
That's what should happen. It won't though.

It is precisely what will happen. The world is not as depicted in tabloids.

Reply 15

Original post by Stiffy Byng
It is precisely what will happen. The world is not as depicted in tabloids.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cv2274gdk10o

Wouldn't be so sure

Reply 16


That has nothing to do with the Joynes case. The ongoing disaster of Tory misgovernment impacts all public services, but Joynes has already been arrested, and convicted. She will be sentenced in due course. The trial judge has already made clear that an immediate custodial sentence is all but inevitable.
(edited 12 months ago)

Reply 17

Original post by Stiffy Byng
That has nothing to do with the Joyner case. The ongoing disaster of Tory misgovernment impacts all public services, but Joyner has already been arrested, and convicted. She will be sentenced in due course. The trial judge has already made clear that an immediate custodial sentence is all but inevitable.

Yeah but lack of spaces means this rapist who cannot be defined as one under uk law will have her sentenced reduced then out early for good behaviour. When I said 6 months, I genuinely think she'll be out in that time or less.

Reply 18

I will bet £100 payable to charity that you are wrong.

Reply 19


While the article you link to does highlight the abject failure of the Conservative Party regarding law and order reflects poorly on those who voted for them, pausing non-priority arrests is an entirely different circumstance to the sentencing for an already convicted sex offender.

Quick Reply