Physics edexcel igcse 2024

202887

How did u guys do in the non-regional paper??

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

sn0w_desert

Original post by 202887

How did u guys do in the non-regional paper??

I found it okay, not weirder than the past papers

Reply 2

sk_5557

it’s quite a nice paper

Reply 3

Raniaa123

Original post by 202887

How did u guys do in the non-regional paper??

wdym by non regional?
just the normal paper with equation list

Reply 4

nineortwelve

Original post by 202887

How did u guys do in the non-regional paper??

Tbh it wasn’t too bad, there were a couple bad questions (the 5 marker at the end made me want to weep icl) but i think overall it was fine, just glad to have the formula booklet

Reply 5

maxe12343

Original post by nineortwelve

Tbh it wasn’t too bad, there were a couple bad questions (the 5 marker at the end made me want to weep icl) but i think overall it was fine, just glad to have the formula booklet

I did area under graph instead of Suvat. Would I get any marks
Also for that energy transfers thing what were the senders with like tick box

Reply 6

Raniaa123

Original post by maxe12343

I did area under graph instead of Suvat. Would I get any marks
Also for that energy transfers thing what were the senders with like tick box

btw it wasn't area under graph. u might get marks
you had to do a= v-u/t to find the acceleration and then put the other formula and rearrange so s = v^2-u^2 divided by 2 a to get distance

Reply 7

nineortwelve

Original post by maxe12343

I did area under graph instead of Suvat. Would I get any marks
Also for that energy transfers thing what were the senders with like tick box

I didnt do so at either, I also tried to do area under graph, i literally counted the individual boxes, praying it gets a couple marks. Which energy transfer questions? I kinda forgot the options

Reply 8

Raniaa123

Original post by nineortwelve

I didnt do so at either, I also tried to do area under graph, i literally counted the individual boxes, praying it gets a couple marks. Which energy transfer questions? I kinda forgot the options

there was the energy transfer for the planets when it changes to protostar- astrophysics

Reply 9

nineortwelve

Original post by maxe12343

I did area under graph instead of Suvat. Would I get any marks
Also for that energy transfers thing what were the senders with like tick box

Oh yeah, uh im pretty sure i said chemical decreased, gravitation stayed the same, temperature increased and i don’t remember what the last one was but i think i said increased for that one too

Reply 10

Raniaa123

Original post by nineortwelve

Oh yeah, uh im pretty sure i said chemical decreased, gravitation stayed the same, temperature increased and i don’t remember what the last one was but i think i said increased for that one too

same I also idid the last one was nuclear and that also increased

Reply 11

maxe12343

Original post by Raniaa123

btw it wasn't area under graph. u might get marks
you had to do a= v-u/t to find the acceleration and then put the other formula and rearrange so s = v^2-u^2 divided by 2 a to get distance

Yes I know
Will I get any marks

Reply 12

Raniaa123

Original post by maxe12343

Yes I know
Will I get any marks

u might get 1 or 2 but not full

Reply 13

night10923481

Original post by Raniaa123

btw it wasn't area under graph. u might get marks
you had to do a= v-u/t to find the acceleration and then put the other formula and rearrange so s = v^2-u^2 divided by 2 a to get distance

That’s completely wrong, acceleration is not constant

Reply 14

maxe12343

im lsot as to why it cant be area under grpah as a estimate(ik quesuton didnt say estimate)

Reply 15

sk_5557

did area under the graph, rectangle + πr²/4 got something like 3483m?

Reply 16

maxe12343

Original post by sk_5557

did area under the graph, rectangle + πr²/4 got something like 3483m?

i got 3600 or smth

Reply 17

night10923481

Original post by nineortwelve

Oh yeah, uh im pretty sure i said chemical decreased, gravitation stayed the same, temperature increased and i don’t remember what the last one was but i think i said increased for that one too

nah it’s chemical decrease, temp increase, nuclear same and gravitational decrease

Reply 18

Hopefuluser

Original post by Raniaa123

same I also idid the last one was nuclear and that also increased

I dont think nuclear increased because it said from the point of the nebula to just before the main sequence is formed, so no nuclear fusion has occured yet as that only happens in main sequence